I realize exa is still in the EPEL9 repos, was wondering if there is an
intention to move to its replacement eza as was done in F39 and F40?
Ian
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel
On 2/9/23 07:38, Richard Shaw wrote:
I know upgrades are not supported but its for a small home server that
really only does two things:
For a home server you can use RHEL, the real deal, why mess with
downstream rebuilds?
Just a thought.
Ian
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ
may have dated back to May for all I know.
I became aware of the QT conflict when I used the command line to do
updates from a virtual console, but the issue could have been there from
any time in the past.
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
e. I can understand that RHEL 9 changes may have
introduced "difficulties" but some response, any response, would be nice.
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedorap
