[EPEL-devel] Re: Report on various meetings at FOSDEM.

2016-02-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 19 February 2016 at 08:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:42:12 -0700 > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> >> One of the requests was to have snapshots of the guidelines that we >> worked each channel against so that it was clearer what 5 wanted

[EPEL-devel] Re: Report on various meetings at FOSDEM.

2016-02-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:42:12 -0700 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > One of the requests was to have snapshots of the guidelines that we > worked each channel against so that it was clearer what 5 wanted > versus 6 wanted. Sure, we have it divided into 5 and 6 here (I assume we

[EPEL-devel] Re: Report on various meetings at FOSDEM.

2016-02-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 18 February 2016 at 12:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:42:18 -0700 > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> >> Apologies and So Forth >> >> >> >> First, I would like to apologize for the delay in

[EPEL-devel] Re: Report on various meetings at FOSDEM.

2016-02-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:42:18 -0700 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Apologies and So Forth > > > > First, I would like to apologize for the delay in getting this post > done. I really didn't realize the amount of energy the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Report on various meetings at FOSDEM.

2016-02-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 16 February 2016 at 21:51, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes: > > SJS> * The packaging guidelines for each EPEL version are not > SJS> clear. This is mainly due to the fact that they are usually based > SJS> off of