On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 06:48:21PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems.
> > At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we
> > switched to 'add a 0 to
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems.
> At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we
> switched to 'add a 0 to release so the rhel package always gets
> installed in favor of it'.
It
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:35:27PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just filed https://pagure.io/epel/issue/152 to ask if we should
> revisit the policy for
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packaging/#limited_arch_packages
>
> This policy seems very similar
