[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:41:54 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 January 2016 at 13:48, Toshio Kuratomi > wrote: > > Despite the confusion, my feeling is that we want the newer > > versions. People who want to run python3 are willing to live more > > on the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

On 01/06/2016 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:41:54 +1000 > Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> On 6 January 2016 at 13:48, Toshio Kuratomi >> wrote: >>> Despite the confusion, my feeling is that we want the newer >>> versions. People who want

[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 01/06/2016 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Also, now that 35 is out, do we want to switch epel7 to python35 before > > we go building out things much more? > > > > kevin > > Actually, I think it would be nice to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

> -Original Message- > From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 05:42 > To: Fedora Python SIG > Cc: EPEL Development List > Subject: Re: [EPEL-devel] Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7? > > On 6 January 2016 a

[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi writes: TK> We would have been in a lot better place today if we had separate TK> packaging of python2 and python3 packages in Fedora so that they TK> were never in sync there but that's not something we can probably TK> change now Nothing

[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:07:22PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > So, I've started packaging up a bunch of python3 only packages for EPEL7 for > packages that were already in RHEL7. I've started by packaging the latest > version of the modules: > > python34-py.noarch 1.4.30-2.el7