[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

Am 24.05.22 um 19:53 schrieb Maxwell G via epel-devel: On Monday, May 23, 2022 11:18:38 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote: I've been coming to the thinking that naming the SRPMS python3X-%{srcname}-epel is a better choice. This makes modifying original Fedora specs simpler. I think that makes

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 12:53:36 PM CDT Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > I think it's better to add `Requires: > python%{python3_pkgversion}-rpm-macros`. > To be fair, they both do effectively the same thing: set %__python3 to the > correct value. In any case, I submitted >

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On 25. 05. 22 2:52, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 6:56:41 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote: Sure, except I know nothing about how docs.fp.o works ;) The source code for the EPEL docs page is here[1]. Honestly, I'm not super familiar with it either :). [1]:

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 6:56:41 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote: > Sure, except I know nothing about how docs.fp.o works ;) The source code for the EPEL docs page is here[1]. Honestly, I'm not super familiar with it either :). [1]: https://pagure.io/epel/tree/main > It looks like it's hard-coded

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On 25. 05. 22 1:56, Orion Poplawski wrote: == Issues == * How to handle %{py3_dist} macro? I believe `%{py3_dist}` works properly if you add `%global python3_pkgversion 3X`. It looks like it's hard-coded to python3dist, so I think it has to change to %{py38_dist}. That could (should?)

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On 5/24/22 11:53, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: On Monday, May 23, 2022 11:18:38 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote: I've been coming to the thinking that naming the SRPMS python3X-%{srcname}-epel is a better choice. This makes modifying original Fedora specs simpler. I think that makes sense,

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Monday, May 23, 2022 11:18:38 PM CDT Orion Poplawski wrote: > I've been coming to the thinking that naming the SRPMS > python3X-%{srcname}-epel is a better choice. This makes modifying > original Fedora specs simpler. I think that makes sense, especially considering that these packages will

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On 5/17/22 12:05, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: Am 17.05.22 um 18:08 schrieb Maxwell G: On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:58:33 AM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: https://paste.centos.org/view/06187bdb adapts

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1:05:20 PM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > PS: Is it only my impression or do others feel also the same. Starting > with EL8 the expenses just for the platform (distribution) gets more and > more attention in our daily work. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

Am 17.05.22 um 18:08 schrieb Maxwell G: On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:58:33 AM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: https://paste.centos.org/view/06187bdb adapts https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-passlib/blob/main/f/python-passlib.spec to build it locally (for the sake of progress I

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:58:33 AM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > https://paste.centos.org/view/06187bdb > > adapts > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-passlib/blob/main/f/python-passlib.spec > > to build it locally (for the sake of progress I disabled the tests/nose >

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On 17. 05. 22 16:58, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: Am 17.05.22 um 14:57 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 07:02, Josh Boyer > wrote:     On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:42 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel     mailto:epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>>

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

Am 17.05.22 um 14:57 schrieb Stephen Smoogen: On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 07:02, Josh Boyer > wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:42 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel mailto:epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > with the

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Monday, May 16, 2022 2:41:57 PM CDT Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > with the "upcoming" ansible-core migration, I wonder if its possible to > provide a python-passlib package (or stream) for the python38 > environment (ansible-core dependency). Yes, it's possible. You can create a

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 07:02, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:42 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > with the "upcoming" ansible-core migration, I wonder if its possible to > > provide a python-passlib package (or stream) for the python38 > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-passlib for python38 module

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:42 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > > Hi all, > > with the "upcoming" ansible-core migration, I wonder if its possible to > provide a python-passlib package (or stream) for the python38 > environment (ansible-core dependency). > > The current status: > > # rpm -q