[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: generating openssl3 packages from openssl spec

2021-11-18 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:21:35PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:50:44PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 15:48 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > > > > This shows the minimum changes needed to: > > > - have openssl3-libs

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: generating openssl3 packages from openssl spec

2021-11-10 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> Troy Dawson writes: > If I remember right, the spec file name needs to be in the format > .spec Thus, the spec file needs to be > openssl3.spec, and thus you aren't really renaming it. :) Yes, assuming that EPEL doesn't deviate:

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: generating openssl3 packages from openssl spec

2021-11-10 Thread Troy Dawson
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:38 AM Michel Alexandre Salim < mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 19:40 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Per

[EPEL-devel] Re: RFC: generating openssl3 packages from openssl spec

2021-11-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi all, > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007031 -- openssl 3.x > won't be added to RHEL 8, while updated packages are starting to need > it. > > It thus seems to be a good candidate for EPEL; the question is -