Re: Exchange 2000 DR

That's a great question. I don't know the answer, though. It'd be nice to hear what happens - please report back when you complete your testing! - Original Message - From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:21 PM

Re: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000

The move mailbox method would be my recommendation. No extended downtime, no risk to the current environment. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000

Re: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Gosh, Greg, it's so nice to know that we can rely on you to stir up this conversation every six months or so so that the new folks will get to know a little history of the list. Anyway, this whole diatribe was started because Ed admitted that he's a vendor whore. What I'm not understanding is

Re: Backup rituals

That's what transaction logs are for. If you lost the edb, you can still recover to the latest mail with the logs. if you lose the logs, you have the current copy of the priv. - Original Message - From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Exchange client or mapi

I sent the Exchange 4 client offline. - Original Message - From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:28 PM Subject: RE: Exchange client or mapi Tried profman2. doesn't create a profile. I do NOT want outlook.

Re: Degrag (ESEUTIL) and retention time

I believe that is how it works. - Original Message - From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:18 PM Subject: Degrag (ESEUTIL) and retention time Hi My customer ex 55 has reached the 16 Gb Limit If now

Re: Backup rituals

Full backups daily. Anything else is a PITA to restore. If you don't have the tape (or the time) to do this, a full on a weekly basis and a daily incremental is the least sucky alternative. Missy - Original Message - From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

Re: Backup rituals

Full backups daily. Anything else is a PITA to restore. If you don't have the tape (or the time) to do this, a full on a weekly basis and a daily differential is the least sucky alternative. Make sure you have the disk space available to support a week's worth of transaction log files. Missy

Re: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit

yes - Original Message - From: Guy Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:13 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 IS has reached the 16GB limit http://support.microsoft.com/?id=185457 I want to do an eseutil to defragment the IS,

Re: Calculate size of priv1.stm - and make it smaller

What size disks are you using? Sounds like they must be pretty small. The only way to make these files smaller is to take them offline and run eseutil on them - there should be 1221 events in your application event logs that will tell you how much white space you can reclaim by running the

Re: Finding full mailboxes.

Full? Do you mean near their limit? I'd imagine that Message Stats from Quest could help you do this quite nicely. - Original Message - From: Patrick Scribner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:31 AM Subject: Finding full

Re: OE Marking POP Messages Read

This is by design. I don't believe that there's a fix. Have you tried IMAP instead of POP? That should resolve this issue, kinda - any messages that aren't marked as read in the IMAP client should remain marked as unread. Missy - Original Message - From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: need Exchange client

I sent him a copy offline. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:55 PM Subject: RE: need Exchange client You still need it? I can send it to tomorrow when I get to work let me know offline.

Re: Permission Issue?

My understanding is that an open session remains open and that disabling the account will not impact that session. - Original Message - From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 9:11 AM Subject: Permission Issue? Windows

Re: Permission Issue?

his workstation though. Scott...the only thing I can think of, is that you have changed the default refresh value for the DC's from 15 minutes to over an hour. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions

Re: DNS DHCP Question

Search TechNet for hijack dhcp and you should find some interesting stuff. BTW, The Key School is an excellent school. Good gig - and I'd maim to be able to have that commute (assuming you live near/in Annapolis!) Missy - Original Message - From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars

problem with other users' calendars Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars No, these are all set to GMT which is correct. Subject: Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0400 X-Message-Number

Re: Second Storage Group

Yup. While you might consider a separate array for the second SG for better performance, it will run without having one. missy - Original Message - From: Pham, Tuan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: Second Storage

Re: Time sync problem with other users' calendars

Daylight savings time settings on the machines. - Original Message - From: Tim Gowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:44 AM Subject: Time sync problem with other users' calendars When one of our PAs puts an appointment into

Re: OWA permissions

Do users have log on locally permissions on the OWA server? If not, they need them. Missy - Original Message - From: Johnny Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:59 AM Subject: OWA permissions Hi all, I just reinstalled

Re: OWA permissions

That was the problem. Thanks guys! Johnny PS. Wow, Missy you are still on this list? What's it been 3 years? :) -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA permissions Do users have log on locally

Re: Exchange Disaster Recovery Story - Comments Appreciated

Also, a simple thing to do is to take offline backups of the IS (priv and pub) and the transaction log files so that you can easily restore them (without losing any data), should the database move fail. Missy - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

Re: OWA Error

Think smtp address instead of UPN and it isn't. - Original Message - From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:40 AM Subject: RE: OWA Error Hi, I've tried that as well and still no go. Isn't UPN just for 2000? Cheers,

Re: Store.exe pegging the processor

I would not do a defrag without a backup. Restart the store, take a full backup, and wait to see what happens. What's your online maintenance schedule look like? - Original Message - From: Joe Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22,

Re: Routine Maintenance

Well, internet.com bought them, then they RIF'ed Stephen Wynkoop (the swynk in swynk), and then they pretty much botched the list entirely. I think it's still running only because they've forgotten about its existence! - Original Message - From: Shotton Jolyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: OWA Error

5.5. I know what you're saying but can this be setup for 5.5? I hadn't read anything that said it could... Thanks -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Error Think smtp address

Re: Routine Maintenance - OT swynk history

. Where do people go now instead? I particularly used to use swynk for their SMS coverage and I may soon be getting back into this area. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 July 2003 17:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routine Maintenance

Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al)

Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASPNoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al)

would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy

Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)

points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re

Re: Routine Maintenance

Why bother with them? - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:35 PM Subject: RE: Routine Maintenance You should do offline backups too though. It's just when to do them. They take a long time.

Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}

LOL. I think it's hysterical. - Original Message - From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM Subject: FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!} I know we discussed this at length before - I

Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}

It's been a while since I've seen a good mail loop. :) - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 9:07 PM Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!} No need to 'bump' someone

Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach the server from the desktop? - Original Message - From: Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:40 AM Subject: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Just started this

Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k There's nothing obvious in the event log. I've also turning on a dianostic logging to maximum. Yes I can rpcping the server. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

exception 0x6ba. The server is unavailable. - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Anything in the event logs? Can you use rpcping to reach

Re: Store.exe memory leak

The store is designed to use DBA, which will consume all of the memory available. What's in your event logs when the IMS shuts down? - Original Message - From: Mark Pouncey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 2:32 PM Subject: Store.exe

Re: MS Purchase

2000? hmmm... - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:59 PM Subject: Re: MS Purchase Exchange 2000 RTM. - Original Message - From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

Re: OWA config (revisited)

Users should be able to connect from any site. This assumes a normal configuration. Missy - Original Message - From: Chakravarty, Sakti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:24 PM Subject: OWA config (revisited) Hi all, I know this

Re: Exchange Rules

How could you not know this? I think there are some details missing. Simple answer: Open the profile you used and see what's there. - Original Message - From: Scott Manner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:46 AM Subject:

Re: Exchange Rules

an issue with the rule working thx -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Rules How could you not know this? I think there are some details missing. Simple answer: Open

Re: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item

This is by design. LOL. - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:15 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 administrator display cannot display item We just remove an old exchange 5.5 box and when we

Re: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant.

Use cleansweep from the Back Office Resource Kit (I forget which one...) - Original Message - From: Miller, LT Johnny -wcso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:32 PM Subject: Now I get this error. Inbox Assistant. Now I get this

Re: SMTP connector issue

What's the encoding look like on the client? That's a WAG, BTW. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 3:40 PM Subject: SMTP connector issue Exchange 2k SP3 Finally, I got an event on this.

Re: Exchange2000 to a new server

Don't bother keeping the same server name. Really. Trust me. Check out the Exchange FAQs at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm for more info. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL

Re: Sloooooow roaming profile logins W2K/E2k/OL2003

The best workaround is to remove as much stuff as possible from the profile. But that also means that you won't have all the stuff your users want. Seriously, there's no good workaround. Missy Koslosky Exchange MVP - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

Re: Trans logs

Are you sure you're doing a NORMAL or FULL backup, instead of a COPY? And you're checking the dates on the logs, right? - Original Message - From: Ashraph, Elizabeth A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:15 AM Subject: RE: Trans

Re: Directory Export - SMTP address

The simplest way to do this, IIRC, is to add email addresses as a column when you're viewing the Recipients container (or the GAL) from Admin. You can do a File | Save Window Contents As... (or something like that - I don't have Admin here) and dump that to a csv. Missy - Original Message

Re: automating the change of delivery outlook

Do you mean change the delivery point in Outlook from a PST to the mailbox itself? If so, no, I do not know of a way to change this programmatically. Would be nice, though. Missy - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway

I've never seen a reason to set these to anything but the defaults. Missy - Original Message - From: Tim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:28 PM Subject: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway A survey: How many

Re: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange

Yup. That or Outlook rules are about your only choices, Samir. Missy - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:13 PM Subject: RE: Alternative to UNIX procmail in Exchange write your own

Re: No originator messages

And the yellow bar worries you? Exchange can handle a huge queue quite nicely. Ignore the queues unless nothing (and I do mean nothing) is moving. Missy - Original Message - From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 22,

Re: DL Question

It is silently dropped. - Original Message - From: Morgan, Joshua [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:20 PM Subject: DL Question What happens to an E-mail that is sent to a DL that has no members? TIA, Joshua Joshua

Re: Joining Site

MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions

Re: Joining Site

What permissions do you have? You need at least view only on the site configuration containers on the 5.5 side. Missy - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:11 PM Subject: Joining Site

Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users

There's no allowed number of connections, per se, but IIS starts crapping out after about 200 concurrent OWA sessions. I don't have a specific reference for this, but I did some extensive testing on this a couple years ago, and this was what we found. Missy - Original Message - From:

Re: OWA and Apache

You cannot. Missy - Original Message - From: Weatherly, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:03 PM Subject: OWA and Apache Ok sorry if this is an ignorant question but, Situation: 1 public IP 1 Windows 2000 server in DMZ

Re: Weird bounced message

Use the track message tool in Admin (if 5.5) or the Message Tracking Center in ESM (if E2K). Missy - Original Message - From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: RE: Weird bounced message I

Re: Public Folder

Use Deleted Items retention to restore it. Make sure that the DumpsterAlwaysOn registry key (search TechNet for info) has been applied to her workstation so you can restore it from there - and show her how to recover it so you needn't visit next time she screws up. Missy - Original Message

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8

Re: Multiple updaters for a DL

- From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:54 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL It is indeed a migration issue. It's dealt with by going through the 5.5 directory and identifying mailboxes that are owned

Re: Exchange 2000 Features

You cannot. - Original Message - From: CHRIS H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:32 AM Subject: Exchange 2000 Features Does anyone know if in Exchange 2000 you can turn on/off OOO replies/autoresponders to the internet on

Re: Exch2000 OWA new mail notification

There's no way to do this without rewriting code. Good request, though. Have you tried sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Missy - Original Message - From: Chris Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: Exch2000

Re: Meeting requests, 2 Exchange 5.5 Organizations

I promise that posting the same question using two different accounts will not make the answer to your question show up twice as fast. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:02 AM Subject: Meeting

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? Missy - Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA Missy, when you say doesn't do it nicely, does that imply that it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? - Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: There aren't any real best practices

Re: sp3 revisited

Just one. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:30 PM Subject: RE: sp3 revisited Actually, Exchange 4.0 had some early service packs that were not. :) -Original Message- From:

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

of money they are asking for it. Cheers, Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems

Re: recommendation please

Google. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation please Can you tell me where to get more information on minesweeper. -Original Message- From: Leo

Re: Exchange 2000 HA

of money they are asking for it. Cheers, Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: I mean that you need to take into account the way Exchange works with its transaction logs - how they're cached and then written. Doing this simultaneously with geographically dispersed systems

Re: filtering e-mail

Before? It's posted daily. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: filtering e-mail Exchange5.5 WinNT4 sp6 Inoculate IT I know this have been posted before but can someone

Re: Exchange Delete

The white space will be available after an online defrag is run, it simply won't show up as space on the disk itself. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM Subject: RE: Exchange

Re: filtering e-mail

for this answer. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: filtering e-mail Before? It's posted daily. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions

Re: Public Folders

You need to lock down top-level PF creation. Q256131 - Original Message - From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: Public Folders Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had

Re: Recovering Deleted Public Folder

Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled. There's a Q article on how to do this for a PF. Missy - Original Message - From: Aamir Hanif [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: Recovering Deleted

Re: backup failure

you are backing up mailboxes, not the information stores. Check your documentation, or see the FAQ. - Original Message - From: paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:19 AM Subject: backup failure Hi, My backup have failed

Re: MS Exchange 5.5

What is the domain name that's having issues? That's the simplest way to get this sorted out! - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:56 PM Subject: MS Exchange 5.5 I'm having problems with my

Re: Modifying Users

I'd export the directory, gather the names of users that have HR in the appropriate field, and import those names appropriately to remove them from the DL's. - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002

Fw: Stores

Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores. - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 PM Subject: RE: Stores Correct -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On

Re: Exchange 2k SMTP

There's a basic article on telnet use in TechNet. Have you looked there? - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP nslookup set q=mx amfes.com finds mx records and ip address How do I

Re: Stores

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: Stores Standard does not allow for multiple private information stores. - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday

Re: Exchange 2k SMTP

What do you see in the smtp logs? - Original Message - From: Daniel L. Miller To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:17 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2k SMTP The problem is that it's not just this address. I'm sending to my own amfes.com address because it's easy to test

Re: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

Standard will do it, but if you have a lot of RAM in the box, Advanced Server plays more nicely with E2K (both standard enterprise). - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 6:24 PM Subject: FW:

Re: IMC issues

Ignore them. They'll eventually time out and disappear from the queues - they're NDR messages. If you cannot cannot cannot make yourself ignore them, whack 'em. Missy - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Unsolicited Email

a... Deckler's back. It's been a long time... - Original Message - From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:49 AM Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.

Re: Storage Groups and Databases

I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG. Your server's going to be hurting no matter what, but the KISS principle comes into play here. Missy - Original Message - From: Bob Chyka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002

Re: The infamous Invalid data in message

What's your number? - Original Message - From: Stevens, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:45 PM Subject: The infamous Invalid data in message This subject has reared it's ugly head once again. There is very little

Re: The infamous Invalid data in message

data in message missy..what number do you speak of? -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The infamous Invalid data in message What's your number? - Original Message - From

Re: Stop System attendant

net stop msexchangesa - Original Message - From: Albert Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:35 PM Subject: Stop System attendant Hi there. I'm running Exchange 2000 and I have a question. For maintenance purpose, I need

Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information

Exmerge. - Original Message - From: Tiresias [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:46 PM Subject: Need to scan a backup for specific information What's the best way to scan a restored backup for specific text (that might be present

Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information

Or not. Dain bread here. - Original Message - From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:58 PM Subject: Re: Need to scan a backup for specific information Exmerge. - Original Message - From: Tiresias [EMAIL

Re: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari

groupshield sucks. sybari doesn't. simple. - Original Message - From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:06 PM Subject: Groupshield 5.0 vs. Sybari I see one big differnce in the apps on paper. Sybari utilizies 4

Re: Turf directory

IIRC, you need to manually create it. M - Original Message - From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 5:20 PM Subject: RE: Turf directory That makes a lot of sense. Thanks. However, I have noticed that despite setting the

Re: Turf directory

Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Turf directory IIRC, you need to manually create it. M - Original Message - From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Unlimited Quotas

For 25 users? How much disk space do you have? 9 GB? Really... if there's no absolute need for quotas, bag the idea. Missy - Original Message - From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:18 AM Subject: Unlimited

Re: Change site and organization names in exch 5.5

Silly thought: Why not just change the display names for the ORG and SITE instead of jumping though hoops? Missy - Original Message - From: Kulwinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:13 AM Subject: RE: Change site and

Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees

Per 1, I'm completely acronym impaired. And that was what, four years ago? Talk about dead dogs. Just call me short and mousey, why don'tcha? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:23 AM

Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees

They go into the air. Boom. Gone. :) - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Now to get that Woodruff guy really pissed

Re: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees

it to illustrate a point. I think the fact that you're acronym impaired, yet otherwise so knowledgeable about Exchange (and many, many other things) was quite illustrative. Re: Short and mousey.. that was what, 3 years ago? Talk about intensely funny. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky

Re: Email Problems

Will Robinson, silly. - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:58 AM Subject: RE: Email Problems Danger will roger! -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

  1   2   3   4   >