On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
(That said, the original request for a port reference document seems
extremely reasonable. The fact that one will not be made available is,
well, bizarre.)
The usual explanation is that Exchange requires so many ports
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo tlemmik...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you mind sharing your opinion on the KEMP product.
There's a guy who hangs out in a blue van at the corner of 5th and
Main who sells some good stuff. Real mellow buzz.
Oh, wait, you said *K*emp.
-- Ben
---
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Alexander Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote:
Moving forward, as RIM has announced full EAS support, is it worthwhile
continuing with BES server licenses if your device management needs are very
low?
From what I'm told:
Classic BB and new BB are two completely
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com wrote:
I have a friend (non-I.T.) who's trying to integrate Moodle (some edu
webapp, php, but supported on Windows) with their exchange environment. It
must rely on this feature...
If the part-after-the-plus-sign follows a
MIME is 20 years old this year. The first RFC entitled
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions was released in June 1992.
Although earlier RFC's giving some of the pieces appeared at least as
early as Jan 1985, and the seminal work was done circa 1989, RFC-1341
was the first official document to
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:45 PM, James Kerr cluster...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow the A record for our mail server got deleted over the weekend at our
web host. Not sure how that happened when only two of us here have access
and I didn't delete it and the other guy says he didn't. I opened a
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Oliver Marshall
oliver.marsh...@g2support.com wrote:
We get alerts from one of our servers about one specific user who has over
500 folders (objects of type Folder) in her mailbox. We’ve had her tidy up
her, rather anal, filing system and remove a load of folders
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Graeme Carstairs loonyto...@gmail.com wrote:
... Adaptec 21960i ...
I don't believe that's a RAID card. In other words, it's an
ordinary SCSI host adapter. Assuming you have the model number
correct, the disks are prolly NT software RAID. You should thus be
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Steve Hanna sha...@fleet.ca wrote:
+1 Arguably he played a much more important role in the advancement
of technology than that of Mr. Jobs ...
Indeed. (Co)creator of both C and Unix. To put that in perspective:
* C/C++ remains one of the most common, if not
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
20gb of email in six months, and it includes full router configs with
passwords, too.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/doppelganger-domains/
Those aren't subdomains.
But yes. Heck, it doesn't even need to be a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
This highlights many reasons why I hardly use facebook anymore.
The block/ignore feature is essential.
(Assuming you find *some* of the people you know on Facebook worthwhile.)
-- Ben
---
To manage
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Thanks to one and all for the birthday greetings.
Happy Birthday!
If there's any one person on this list who deserves our
appreciation, it's you. The amount of knowledge you have and share
about Exchange, and
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Evan Brastow
ebras...@automatedemblem.com wrote:
It would take her more time to send an email.
Consider that that might be a good thing.
-- Ben
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Google, that's a feature. Their take is they didn't
want b.scott@ and bscott@ being two different recipients -- too easily
confused or used in a social engineering attack.
I think its a smart
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Chris cmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Another one missed by none other than Google for their Gmail service is the
. . To Gmail, c.mu...@gmail.com is the same as cmu...@gmail.com is the
same as cmun...@gmail.com.
Didn't know how many of you knew that or not.
According
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, justino garcia jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote:
Beside backupexec, any other 30 user mailbox backup soultion for exchange
2010.
I saw acronis for exchange is that any good?
My budget is 600 max on the software.
Approximately eight years ago, I used what is now
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:11 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
Is rejecting (of any sort like this) considered bad practice,
and if so, can anyone point out any online guidelines for this?
Rejecting during the SMTP transaction does not harm other operators,
and clues in senders on
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Steve Hart sh...@wrightbg.com wrote:
Out of curiosity do most of you still block .scr files?
We block executables by content, regardless of file name.
Since a Windows screensaver is just an executable with a funny name,
they get caught as such. Fonts
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Charles Whitby
charles.whi...@gmail.com wrote:
how are you doing recently?
Good, thanks. How are you?
-- Ben
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.com wrote:
Just need to explain to the users that it will allow for oops, hit the
wrong key but is not intended to be just another folder to keep forever.
In my as yet relatively brief career, I've encountered several
people who
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
I made enemies on the Exchange team complaining quite
vocally about the removal of LCR and SCR.
Hey, good for you for speaking up.
-- Ben
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:54 AM, King's Kid kingskid1002...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll see if I can find those KB articles. When I try to backup the entire C
drive I get error messages. Perhaps I'll try selecting everything one at a
time.
How are you doing your backup?
You can't just use a
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Jim Holmgren jholmg...@xlhealth.com wrote:
Their DBA suggested using ESEUTIL for the copy.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/granth/archive/2010/05/10/how-to-copy-very-large-files-across-a-slow-or-unreliable-network.aspx
Interesting.
Sounds like ROBOCOPY needs
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Unfortunately, TNEF is a proprietary Microsoft format, and is the
antithesis of interoperability.
TNEF is fully documented, and has been for a number of years.
Funny how both statements are true.
It's all
signatureleader-- /leaderbr /nameBen/namebr //signature
/font
/post
Ben Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
wrote:
XML is darned wordy.
post
salutationwordHi/word,/salutation
bodyparagraphsentencewordWhat/wordwordmakes/wordwordyou
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Cameron cameron.orl...@gmail.com wrote:
Was it just me that didn't know that the new MS Office documents (.xlsx,
.docx, etc) were compressed files?
Probably not just you. :)
The OpenOffice/Open Document Format (ODF) formats are the same thing, BTW.
On
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
XML is darned wordy.
post
salutationwordHi/word,/salutation
bodyparagraphsentencewordWhat/wordwordmakes/wordwordyou/wordwordsay/wordwordthat?/word/sentence/paragraph/body
signatureleader-- /leadernameBen/name
/post
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Steve Szabo steve...@gmail.com wrote:
What if he is just some wanna be who knows a bunch about how spammers work,
but does not do it himself?
I rather suspect that's the case; he's either a troll or a stupid
spammer. (The later is not at all rare.)
-- Ben
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
No, not yet. I just got Chapter 7 for review on Sunday. I think that's the
last chapter.
Ah, so you're holding up the works, eh Michael?
SURE...blame it on me!
Isn't that what IT is for? ;-)
-- Ben
---
To
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a strange situation where I have a single message which I have been
able to copy from one exchange 2003 mailbox to another but it will not be
copied into a PST file.
Shot in the dark: I've seen various extremely
Anyone else getting watch spam via this list (Sunbelt's
exchangelist)? The Received: headers suggest it did indeed come
from lyris.sunbelt-software.com [64.128.133.151].
-- Ben
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
They should have included the hotfixes in the service pack
and installed them automagically where needed.
They aren't Exchange hotfixes.
This is an advantage single-source software has: Because such
software all
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.com wrote:
When I change a name in AD, how long until it propagates to Exchange?
Or do I have to change it somewhere in ESM?
What name did you change? Display name? User account name?
First/last detail names? Exchange mail
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.comwrote:
Our Marketing manager got married, I changed her last name in AD, both in
the properties and the display name.
Okay, so we're talking just the various human-friendly names, and not
any account/alias/address names.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.com wrote:
I did the offline address book update, how do I do the RUS?
In ESM, right below Offline Address Book. Right click the
services in the list on right.
-- Ben
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com wrote:
I have several resource calendars on my Exchange 2003 SP3 server.
Us too.
Recently one of the calendars started bouncing meeting requests
with a 5.7.1 for anyone without full control of the mailbox.
Ideally, post a
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com wrote:
Would definitely be interested in some details as far as client size,
feature usage (shared calendars, contacts, etc...), and the technical
level of the users.
I would too. I'm far from Exchange's biggest fan, but
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Paul Hutchings
paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote:
Mail returns only the primary email address and Proxyaddresses returns all
the email addresses and types (so X400 as well).
I have a Perl script I use to export email addresses from AD on our
*nix mail gateway.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
When waiting is fulfilled.
The Force (of the NDA) is strong in this one... ;-)
-- Ben
Two whole customers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size
-- Ben
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Steve Hart sh...@wrightbg.com wrote:
I'm checking permissions on each of registry keys specified in KN
260378, trying to determine why my uninstall is failing.
Get a hold of Process Monitor from Microsoft Sysinternals, and
filter on ACCESS DENIED and see what
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Steve Hart sh...@wrightbg.com wrote:
Thanks Ben, I’ve been struggling with this off and on for months and this
finally did the trick.
Sweet. Glad to be of help!
-- Ben
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
The SPF records only need to specify the interface establishing the SMTP
session correct?
SPF is most commonly used to say, Mail from my domain can only
originate from these IP addresses. So what matters is how other
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
I know we often see addresses entered incorrectly so there's a
good chance we're continually pounding invalid addresses ...
Some of those addresses will be valid -- for other people.
The ideal thing to do is have
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
So my spf should be as simple as:
v=spf1 a:host.domain.com ~all
It could be, assuming host.domain.com has A record(s) for all your
possible source IP address(es).
-- Ben
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
It was just brought to my attention that we have an online service that
generates messages to our employees, with the sender address appeaing to
come from our domain.
That will be something you have to account for.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:30 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
And naturally, it’s the Florida Auditor General’s office that’s rejecting
it—so
it’s kind of important to get it fixed.
Have you tried contacting the destination and asking them why they
are rejecting
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:04 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Yeah, I've talked to their admin. He's sort of like me--Jack of all trades,
master
of none. Doesn't seem to know much more about SPF than I do, so he's not
able to determine specifically why they're
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Steve Hart sh...@wrightbg.com wrote:
The path listed in that error shows as a folder in regedit with dozens of
subfolders and keys. Is there a way to pin down the culprit?
In REGEDIT, registry keys are displayed as folders. So
key==folder. The things that
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you need a separate SPF record for each sending domain even if they're
hosted within the same messaging environment?
SPF records let a domain specify policies on who is permitted to use
that domain to send mail.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Steve Hart sh...@wrightbg.com wrote:
In regedit, there's no properties selection displayed. In regedt32, I can
get to permissions from the security menu.
Oh. I forgot that Win 2000 has the brain damaged registry editor
twins. Sorry. Yah.
There a lot of
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Leedy, Andy ale...@butlerschein.com wrote:
http://oldcomputers.net/kim1.html
When I was a wee lad I got a Microcomputer Trainer Kit from Rat
Shack as a gift. It was kinda like that, only it used cardboard and
wires and clips instead of a PCB, and it had no I/O
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:36 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Yes FrontBridge and BPOS are different support #’s, but when C-level’s have
a bad taste that’s all they need.
Companies live and die by their reputation with customers. Large
companies with multiple product lines don't
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Maglinger, Paul pmaglin...@scvl.com wrote:
A place I worked had an electronic adding machine. ... something
like 8 PC boards, and each board must have had 100 transistors.
At $WORK, we have a measurement system (test equipment) known as an
HP 8510. It's around
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@smithcons.com forwarded:
... Each workload page (which have replaced the previous heavily text-based
pages) ...
... please send me any feedback!
Please consider passing along the message that the elimination of
text content in favor
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:25 AM, John Bowles john.bow...@wlkmmas.org wrote:
Michael is an outstanding resource to this list as well as others. Great
job Michael!
I'll second (third?) that. While MBS and I don't always agree about
Microsoft's design decisions and company politics, his
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:00 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
We have an ex employee that is sending messages to
essentially the whole company.
...
Does anyone have any info, Legal or other, that we can use to put a halt to
this?
I think everybody else's advise to contact corporate
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
I wasn't aware we were legally obligated to accept email from ex-employees.
You're not. But by the same token, the guy's ISP is not legally
obligated to give a crap about you. Your lawyers may know of
something they are
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:04 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
... sending 150 people a message containing unproven allegations
meant to destabilize and dismay current staff won't be allowed.
What you write sounds completely reasonable to me. That doesn't
matter one iota.
I repeat:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Now I'm standing there, I've got the running lawnmower in my right hand and
the 1.7 giga-volt fence wire in the other hand.
Doc BrownOne point seven jigga volts!?!?!?!/Doc Brown
A friend of mine one pissed on an
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Travis Robinson
travis.robin...@octanner.com wrote:
I have a user that used to receive NDRs with the original email attached.
I believe that bounce/NDR/DSN/whatever is being generated and sent
by the other end. The other end prolly changed their config.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Stephan Barr
stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com wrote:
WIndows 2003 AD functional level, Exchange 2003 fully patched. The company
has AD/VPN endpoint sites in 3 locations around the country. For DNS
purposes, routing, RDNS, OWA and such wIll the Exchange server need
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:32 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
... each user can have more than one connection to mailbox so
at 3 connections each they would exceed the default of 16 ...
I know Outlook Express used to do this. It would open a new IMAP
connection for practically
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
Exchange, since at least 5.5, has had the option of using different DNS
servers
for outgoing resolution; somewhat necessitating it having a different
resolver.
I don't know anything about what the DNS resolver
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.com wrote:
Yeah right, like anyone on this list can ignore anything.
Come on, we are geeks and this is our social life. J
Hey, I resemble that remark!
-- Ben
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Andy Shook andy.sh...@peak10.com wrote:
What do you call a fly without wings?
A ‘walk’.
Q: What do you call a deer with no eyes?
A: No eye-deer. [say it out loud]
Q: What do you call a deer with no eyes and no legs?
A: Still no eye-deer.
-- Ben
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done that as well - but it was done before the user had a chance to get
Outlook running.
Right.
Just to be clear: I suggested it as an alternate solution, not to
prove it's okay to delete EXTEND.DAT
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Liby Philip Mathew
lmat...@path-solutions.com wrote:
Liby Philip Mathew would like to recall the message, Please
help E2K7 Autodiscovery OAB.
Ben Scott would like to win the lottery.
It looks like neither of us are going to get what we want
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.com wrote:
I trust everyone is remembering to vote every day J
I am!!!1onewon
;-)
BTW: The voting form allows addresses @hood.com, so you can vote as
many times as you like. But I have dibs on
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:17 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
Wondering what an 'MX' SPF directive might be??
All the A records for all the MX records for domain are tested in
order of MX priority. If the client IP is found among them, this
mechanism matches.
(from
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:50 AM, David W. McSpadden dav...@imcu.com wrote:
I have been given the green light to research bringing all mail in house
onto the Exchange 2003 server.
And there was much rejoicing!
I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain. I have an ASA firewall and
an
The nerve of users, expecting to use the email server to store email.
Next they'll be putting files on the file server, or using the print
server to print.
-- Ben
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.com wrote:
Well, what I never understood was that they kept telling us there is a
hole in the ozone and that was bad, but if our big laser printer were putting
out ozone that was also bad.
Water is sometimes good for you
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Robinson, Chuck chuck.robin...@emc.com wrote:
And if we don't cut some of the big trees, little baby trees and bushes won't
have a chance to sprout and grow to become adolescent trees, and then
mommy and daddy big trees.
That's okay, the trees are all kept
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, phones take 20Kbps/line when in use...
A standard DS0 channel is *exactly* 64,000 bits per second.
VoIP varies by codec and config, but 40 to 50 Kbit/sec is usually
what I see quoted.
-- Ben
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
Sorry, just hatin on the V, they sent us Curves for a project that requires
GPS, assuring us that that was what everyone else used with this program and
once we tried testing the app and it bombed they fessed up and said the
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Matt Moore mattmoore...@hotmail.com wrote:
It may be the hardware limitations of a CDMA system but you just
never know.
It's not the fault of CDMA. Sprint uses CDMA and they don't play
VZW's games. My favorite part is that Sprint has roaming agreements
with
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Bill Lambert blamb...@concuity.com wrote:
... was wondering if anyone knows if/when Sterling will be out?
About three months before it's ready. ;-)
(Stolen from someone on this list.)
-- Ben
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, tbarnh...@rcrh.org wrote:
I thought we were still months out on these. Is this correct that this is
the RTM?
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=exchange+2010+rtm
-- Ben
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Barsodi.John john.bars...@igt.com wrote:
We use TFS for the coding of our actual products for our engineering
groups.
If you've got an existing revision control system, I'd suggest going
with that.
I’ll look into those, just trying to find something simple.
I know this thread is kind of old, but today's Dilbert speaks to one
of the potential problems with IT outsourcing:
http://www.dilbert.com/2009-10-30/
HHOS.
-- Ben
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL, very funny. Oh, and an 91 on the test for me!!
Hey, good for you! You're edjumacated now. ;-)
-- Ben
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Bob Fronk b...@btrfronk.com wrote:
Example: Important email in inbox. User accidentally selects the email and
Shift-Delete. Now email is not in Deleted items and requires IT assistance
for recover.
It hurts when I stick a fork in my eye.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote:
... not to mention acts of God like a fiber cut on I-95 ...
I don't mind God so much. I'm worried about acts of backhoe. ;-)
-- Ben
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Don Guyer don.gu...@prufoxroach.com wrote:
MX Logic. Now, they do have their good and
bad moments, but nothing like we experienced
with Postini.
We're actually unhappy with MX Logic because of the opposite
problem: *Everything* gets silently discarded, almost
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Matthew Bullock mbull...@root9.com wrote:
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/11/16/431521.aspx
ActiveX is a plague on humanity.
-- Ben
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Wulff Jr, Ronald J.
rwu...@reedsmith.com wrote:
We experienced an issue that caused significant delays to inbound mail
delivery for users on System 7.
System 7? Google's running Postini on a classic Macintosh? ;-)
-- Ben
The obvious stuff will doubtless be covered. Here's an interesting
angle that may not be:
Nortel Networks (formerly Northern Telecom, also notable for owning
the trademark on NT, much to Microsoft's dismay) used to be one of
the biggest telephone equipment manufacturers in the world. Their
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Don Andrews don.andr...@safeway.com wrote:
What if anything are you folks using to remote control your Blackberry
devices? (ala Dameware etc.)
Are you looking to take control of a BlackBerry device *from* another host?
Or are you looking to *use* the
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
But as stated he’s correct…. Xmodem to a BBS was not the interweb
maxwell_smartWould you believe XMODEM to a VAX with a frame relay
IP link?/maxwell_smart
-- Ben
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Sobey, Richard A r.so...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Because downloading software illegally is usually more
frowned upon than simply using a piece of hardware outside
of its artificially created limits.
I can't resist pointing out that the limits on pay software are
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
But playing language lawyer to try and dodge
ownership of what you say -- that is bogus.
I really dont know how I could have written a more neutral
statement about it originally or in my reply to you.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
Their advertising is cute,
however it is more like a smear campaign then actually promoting their
product.
Yah, and I've discovered that after drinking beer, I'm not
surrounded by hot women and fast cars, either! What
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do this if you Jailbreak.
Most people probably don't want to pin their business communications
on something that involves possible license violations and may
suddenly be made to stop working at any
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Shields, Anthony
ashie...@epsteinatlanta.org wrote:
Anyone know why we receive a bunch of emails like this from time to time? I
assume it’s a coding issue, but that doesn’t satisfy users who want to know
more.
You'll need to post a complete, verbatim copy of
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Chris Drobny
cdro...@lmsintellibound.com wrote:
Had one setting that was a “little” unsecure ...
Is that like being a little bit pregnant?
-- Ben
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't recall for the life of me which
kill command to use to get that thing going again.
From ye old command line:
TASKLIST /SVC
to get the services running in a process. Find the PID of the service. Then
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
I didnt say to pin it on anything. I said it can be done; which is true.
That's disingenuous. The whole conversation is about using the
iPhone in a business environment.
We discuss firmware hacks and
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see what was disingenuous about my reply to Bob.
Not your reply to Bob, you reply to me. Which I read along the
lines of, Oh, I didn't mean you should actually *do* what I was
talking about, I was
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Doug Rooney d...@sonomatilemakers.com wrote:
I am attempting to migrate my Exchange 2003 to a new server ...
Same software on both old and new servers? If so, make sure both
have the same Service Pack, updates, hotfixes, etc.
What version and Service Pack
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
