On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone please send me a link for an rpm for exim with DKIM
support? I have been unable to find one for RHEL3
ATRPMs ...something like that was said.
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 09:21 +0300, Odhiambo ワシントン wrote:
ATRPMs ...something like that was said.
There is no package in ATRPMs for RHEL3.
I guess the OP could download the SRPM for RHEL4 or RHEL5 and compile a
version locally.
Graeme
--
## List details at
[snipped growing list of subscribers getting copies...]
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 07:52 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
nope. still fails on a number of systems.
Damn.
i am assuming there is a freebsd problem under this and filed pr/134011.
Useful, thanks.
but exim_tidydb is the only code which
On 30 Apr 2009, at 09:35, Graeme Fowler wrote:
Perhaps it's the only binary you've got which accesses the DB files in
the way which tickles them?
Have you tried blowing away all the db files (they are just hints) in
case there is an incompatible format change within the db library (not
an
Odhiambo wrote:
Tom Kistner posted here recently that he's working on that and when he's
done, we'll probably have Exim-4.70 or whatever version number it is given.
Great news!
I just want to say what new releases it is not only improvements but
indication what project is still alive. It is
Hi,
No I have made no changes to exim but FreeBSD has been patched using the
new binary update tool. Though I do not recall having applied any
updates during the last week or two.
So far a I have applied the latest patches to FreeBSD bringing it to
7.1-p4, rebooted and dumped the exim db
Ive been using this
denymessage = inconsistent or no DNS reverse entry for
$sender_host_address
!sender_domains =
/usr/local/etc/exim/whitelisted-domains
!authenticated = *
condition = ${if eq{$host_lookup_failed}{1} {1}{0}}
which I picked up off the list and its
On 30/04/2009, Terry ( 1stKMH ) te...@firstkmh.co.uk wrote:
Ive been using this
denymessage = inconsistent or no DNS reverse entry for
$sender_host_address
!sender_domains =
/usr/local/etc/exim/whitelisted-domains
!authenticated = *
condition = ${if
2009/4/30 Terry ( 1stKMH ) te...@firstkmh.co.uk:
Ive been using this
deny message = inconsistent or no DNS reverse entry for
$sender_host_address
!sender_domains =
/usr/local/etc/exim/whitelisted-domains
!authenticated = *
condition = ${if
Hi, I'm the one who posted the rdns acl some time ago.
What I did to avoid false positives is to extract from this list in
here (http://phpweby.com/software/ip2country) the countries I receive
most of the legit mail, reducing it to /24 or larger nets.
After that you some thousands of entries that
I wonder if this might be possible with Exim?
When we send out a newsletter to our subscribers, it tends to slow down our
regular email from clients on our domain. I have other stand alone servers I
could use as MTAs to share the burden when there's a spike in demand. Due to
the constraints of
Chump Chumpster wrote:
I wonder if this might be possible with Exim?
When we send out a newsletter to our subscribers, it tends to slow down our
regular email from clients on our domain. I have other stand alone servers I
could use as MTAs to share the burden when there's a spike in demand.
Thank Mike. This looks like just what I need to do!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Mike Cardwell
exim-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
Chump Chumpster wrote:
I wonder if this might be possible with Exim?
When we send out a newsletter to our subscribers, it tends to slow down
our
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:33:16PM +0100, Terry ( 1stKMH ) wrote:
Hi, I'm the one who posted the rdns acl some time ago.
What I did to avoid false positives is to extract from this list in
here (http://phpweby.com/software/ip2country) the countries I receive
most of the legit mail, reducing it
Gokul chandrasekharan wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the response. Accounts are hosted in a shared Linux server having
cpanel and Exim MTA. I want to transfer the mail alone for few user accounts
to a new linux server which has exim installed. However it does not have
cpanel or any control panel.
So is the general consensus that this is NOT an exim issue?? The alpine
people aren't very responsive..
In any case, I'm curious to know why it would say it was rejecting the
off-site recipient... in general exim terms. That is, under what
circumstances would this error show up in the exim logs
When I want to toggle b/w logging and no logger I simply comment out
the logfile command in my .forward
Can you tell me if exim has a problem with doing this and still
leaving logwrites uncommented?
Because my ISP tells me they see the following in their log
elast...@kermit.lizardhill.com
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Because my ISP tells me they see the following in their log
elast...@kermit.lizardhill.com voro...@elastica.com R=userforward
defer (-17): error in filter file: attempt to obey logwrite
command without a previous logfile
Looks like you have
Renee wrote:
So is the general consensus that this is NOT an exim issue?? The alpine
people aren't very responsive..
In any case, I'm curious to know why it would say it was rejecting the
off-site recipient... in general exim terms. That is, under what
circumstances would this error show
Robert Nicholson wrote:
When I want to toggle b/w logging and no logger I simply comment out
the logfile command in my .forward
Can you tell me if exim has a problem with doing this and still
leaving logwrites uncommented?
No need to wait for 'you' ('us') *Exim* has just told you so.
20 matches
Mail list logo
