On Monday, July 16, 2012 04:40:58, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 07:14:34, Michael J. Tubby B.Sc G8TIC wrote:
Kevin,
Rather than re-write the Reply-To: header why not just strip it off? The
Reply-To header is used in preference to the From: for
Chris Knadle wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 07:14:34, Michael J. Tubby B.Sc G8TIC wrote:
Kevin,
Rather than re-write the Reply-To: header why not just strip it off? The
Reply-To header is used in preference to the From: for the return
address, if it exists - but there's no requirement for
Kevin,
Rather than re-write the Reply-To: header why not just strip it off? The
Reply-To header is used in preference to the From: for the return
address, if it exists - but there's no requirement for it - AFAIK.
Manipulating headers:
http://wiki.exim.org/FAQ/Headers
Mike
On 14/07/2012
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 07:14:34, Michael J. Tubby B.Sc G8TIC wrote:
Kevin,
Rather than re-write the Reply-To: header why not just strip it off? The
Reply-To header is used in preference to the From: for the return
address, if it exists - but there's no requirement for it - AFAIK.
It may
Looking into rewritting the Reply-To header...
Some info first:
We have a gateway server which does all the Internet mail transfers both in
and out. It has a number of domains it provides mail services for.
On some of the domains, the email is forwarded to specific user accounts to
an Inside
