On 12/06/2024 11:33, Thew, Alan via Exim-users wrote:
listserv_pipe:
driver = pipe
command = /X/bin/lsv_amin -t $local_part
[
driver = accept
condition = ${if match{$local_part}{-dmarc-}{yes}{no}}
retry_use_local_part
transport = listserv_pipe
no_verify
]
Read up on
On 08/06/2024 09:25, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE here.
...
./hintsdb.h:429:14: error: no member named 'len' in 'struct TDB_DATA'
OK, TDB hasn't been tested recently (nobody has volunteered to run
a buildfarm animal...). Nice to hear that someone is running
On 07/06/2024 22:51, Frank Elsner via Exim-users wrote:
dns.c: In function ‘dns_lookup’:
dns.c:1143:9: error: ‘event_action’ undeclared (first use in this function);
did you mean ‘queue_action’?
1143 | s = event_action;
OK, that's a bug. You're building with DISABLE_EVENTS defined.
On 07/06/2024 21:53, Frank Elsner via Exim-users wrote:
My Fedora has libdb-5.3.28-61, according to "ldd exim"
I'm pretty sure that this is Berkeley DB version 5
cc -O -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libdb -o
exim_dbmbuild exim_dbmbuild.o \
-lcrypt -lm -lgdbm
On 07/06/2024 17:33, Frank Elsner via Exim-users wrote:
Did it, same result. Btw, tar file unpacked into new directory, no old files in.
What release of Exim did you last build with?
db_env_create is called when compiled for Berkeley DB 4.1 or later.
What version do you have?
What is the full
On 07/06/2024 16:52, Frank Elsner via Exim-users wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: exim_dbmbuild.o: in function `main':
exim_dbmbuild.c:(.text+0x386): undefined reference to `db_env_create'
/usr/bin/ld: exim_dbmbuild.c:(.text+0x3da): undefined reference to `db_create'
Best immediate guess: you need to do a
Show us your relevant transport, given that's the bit raising your problem.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
##
On 18/05/2024 19:49, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote:
So it's not possible to run arbitrary shell commands by tainting a
variable with `rm -fr /` unless, in this instance,
spfquery.mail-spf-perl performed the operation itself as a result of
the argument?
The docs say (in the
On 17/05/2024 17:45, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote:
I have a run expansion using a tainted variable:
condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \
--ip $sender_host_address \
--scope mfrom \
--identity $sender_address} \
On 17/05/2024 16:03, Ruben Jenster via Exim-users wrote:
I like to ensure that outgoing messages are correctly signed with DKIM.
But unfortunately I can not see any errors in the exim logfiles when signing is
not successful.
Does anyone know how to log DKIM signing errors for outgoing
On 17/05/2024 20:15, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
It doesn't look like the address_data way of getting the forwading
address will work for full sieve / exim filters, does it?
If
- the redirect router that runs the filter has not disabled itself
for verify (cf. the no_verify option)
- the
On 17/05/2024 19:53, Jim Pazarena via Exim-users wrote:
Is there any ftp location where a pre-release or a testing version of exim is
available to fetch and try ?
The sources are at git://git.exim.org/exim.git
You get to build it yourself; but it's available all the time.
During the run-up
On 17/05/2024 19:22, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
But what do you mean by "properly"? How does a router do verification
"improperly"?
A router depends on all the options set for it. Typically, a router
will only depend on things that are already available at ACL time
(for example, the
On 17/05/2024 17:31, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
I think you are mistaken or misunderstood me
Yup - I didn't read the code hard enough.
Thanks for the correction!
So (for the OP) - if the libc crypt() support blowfish,
then a "crypteq" comparison provides access from Exim.
--
On 17/05/2024 10:41, Gandalf Corvotempesta via Exim-users wrote:
That's the standard workflow .. mysql tries to look for my.cnf in the
/etc, then in /etc/mysql/my.cnf (and it finds there),
then in other location (not found, as expected)
But /etc/mysql/my.cnf exists and there are some includes
On 16/05/2024 22:32, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
But my question is about verification, and in
particular about the situation where a RCPT stage ACL will have verify
= recipient. The filter can't be evaluated at that stage.
Verification consists of running the routing process; the same router
On 16/05/2024 22:02, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
But what about forwarding resulting from rules in user .forward files
in either exim filter or sieve format?
It will be a redirect router acessing those files or filters.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
On 16/05/2024 21:28, Gandalf Corvotempesta via Exim-users wrote:
# strace exim -be 2>&1 | grep my.cnf
${lookup mysql{SELECT password AS password}}
access("/etc/my.cnf", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
access("/etc/mysql/my.cnf", R_OK) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD,
On 16/05/2024 21:12, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Not read because that file is included from my.cnf and my.cnf is read.
If my.cnf is beaing read, but does not contain the actual conn spec
you want used, then there's something wrong with your "include" setup.
That configuration can't get read
On 16/05/2024 18:03, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
On 2024-05-16 Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
[...]
Anyway, would be great, if exim can use system's crypto library,
to support all system's password hash formats.
crypteq should already do that.
Unfortunately it does not. There is
On 16/05/2024 15:41, Gandalf Corvotempesta via Exim-users wrote:
hide mysql_servers = 10.23.105.2[exim]/mail/username/dsHg*Qw!eNt6n%nH
# cat /etc/mysql/mariadb.conf.d/99-exim.cnf
[exim]
ssl-mode=REQUIRED
Run a test using "exim -be" of a mysql expansion, under strace.
Is that file
On 16/05/2024 11:11, Gandalf Corvotempesta via Exim-users wrote:
another question: a new mysql server i've created has SSL required for
all connections.
How can I setup exim to use an SSL connection to mysql server ?
Use a Mysql option file giving the required connection specifications.
See
On 15/05/2024 19:32, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
Would it work to specify add_header in an auxiliary ACL actuated
through an expansion in the transport?
Without checking, I'm quite dubious this would work (or continue
to work in the face of future code-changes.
Currently I'd call that
On 14/05/2024 23:09, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
Is there documentation for the "experimental ARC" code in exim?
In the experimental-spec.txt file there is documentation
for the facility. There isn't anything for the code, beyond
the actual source.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription
On 14/05/2024 18:12, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
Clearly this solution is only valid if the add_header action is
"lazily evaluated" i.e. delayed until actual delivery.
Not so. Look at the documentation on verifies and $address_data.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration
On 14/05/2024 09:25, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
Since a mail can be forwarded several times before reaching its final
destination, it looks logical to put X-Forwarded header(s) at each hop [where
it was forwarded].
One might think so... but they don't actually say so. They do suggest ARC,
On 13/05/2024 17:32, francois via Exim-users wrote:
during a change of server, I have just made a double migration of version of
debian and thus of version of exim.
debian 11 => debian 12
Exim version 4.94.2 => Exim version 4.96
But since then, there's been no dkim signature, and gmail in
On 13/05/2024 17:02, Anton via Exim-users wrote:
Accordingly to the Googles' recent changes
https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126?visit_id=638483404863497961-2571982079
https://support.google.com/a/answer/175365?hl=en_topic=1354753
messages forwarded to Gmail should contain X-Forwarded-For:
You should check with the packagers as to what their intent is. Running Exim
non-suid
is definitely more tricky; it traditionally needs privilege for some operations
(including opening the SMTP socket for listen, and for delivery into user's
mailboxes).
There is a docs chapter that discusses
Something is nonstandard about your installation or system.
Has it ever worked? What changed?
Or is this a new setup?
If so you might want to start from scratch.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
On 08/05/2024 09:44, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
Rumour is that Exim 4.99 will be replaced Exim 5
Not in my opinion.
Please do not assume that 4.99 will be the last of the 4. series.
The next number after "99" is "100".
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration
On 30/04/2024 22:40, Zacchaeus Scheffer via Exim-users wrote:
2024-04-30 14:11:13.110 [11791] 1s1rwf-00034B-0B [...]
Try a manual delivery of the spooled message, with debug enabled :-
# exim -d+all -M 1s1rwf-00034B-0B 2>&1 | tee debuglog
and inspect the detailed debug output. Find the
On 02/05/2024 11:30, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
Are you sure with bounces? AFAIK SPF doesn't care about
From: header at all, and in case of empty envelope sender
it uses EHLO name.
You're right; I misremembered. "postmaster@".
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration
On 02/05/2024 10:19, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 02/05/2024 03:38, Thomas Krichel via Exim-users wrote:
I have been wondering if there an exim filter or configuration
snippet that could, say for a set email-to addressre...@repec.org,
first spam filter, if not spam, take
On 02/05/2024 03:38, Thomas Krichel via Exim-users wrote:
I have been wondering if there an exim filter or configuration
snippet that could, say for a set email-to addressre...@repec.org,
first spam filter, if not spam, take the from: field, make this the
reply-to, replace the
On 01/05/2024 22:42, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
What is external forwarding?
Sound like something scary.
My *guess* is:
You mailed person A. A has their mails configured, at the MX for A,
to be forwarded to B. You don't have control over that configuration;
it is entirely A's choice.
On 01/05/2024 17:52, halbtaxabo-jnq--- via Exim-users wrote:
DKIM_DOMAIN = ${lookup{$domain:$h_from:}lsearch{/etc/exim4/dkim/domainslist}}
This doesn't work.
Without knowing where you have used this macro, no: we can't tell you
what you've done wrong.
The canonical documentation for Exim is
On 29/04/2024 07:36, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
please, can you explain me why the $ are escaped?
So that they are not taken as expansion-markers on that line,
in turn so that they are available for the line right after.
You could play with "exim -d" and see what happens in detail
if you
On 28/04/2024 22:32, Mark Hills via Exim-users wrote:
"verify = certificate" no longer passes after some system upgrade.
Some? What, precisely?
My systems running OpenSMTPD submit mail to an Exim smarthost.
Authentication used "verify = certificate", then checks for known
certificate
On 28/04/2024 06:05, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
The router fails all bounces where
inbound_srs{} fails, not only the ones that "look SRS'd".
It assumes that you really are SRS'ing all outbounds, therefore
any bounce not SRS (in addition to those with bad SRS) is
de-facto not valid.
On 24/04/2024 12:13, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:57 PM Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <
exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote:
On 24/04/2024 11:39, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
LMTP error after RCPT TO:
domain.name/johndoe/Maildir
On 24/04/2024 11:39, Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users wrote:
LMTP error after RCPT TO:
First decide what recipient should have been used for the LMTP,
then work backwards to have the router that calls that transport
produce it. I'd expect to see something looking rather more
like
On 23/04/2024 18:09, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
On 2024-04-23 Mark Hills via Exim-users wrote:
How do I access the equivalent of "Envelope-to" header in transport
variables?
I'm trying to call dovecot-lda in a manner that enables its "envelope"
rule.
Iirc think the easiest way
On 18/04/2024 13:06, Sebastian Arcus via Exim-users wrote:
So [217.175.192.143] is the MX Exim contacted for the sender verification, and
[45.86.117.1] is the IP the initial incoming connection came from?
Yes.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
On 18/04/2024 11:18, Sebastian Arcus via Exim-users wrote:
I was recently digging around the Exim logs searching for a particular
connection attempt. I stumbled over the line below which I can't quite make
sense of:
2024-04-14 10:38:27 [217.175.192.143] SSL verify error (during S-verify for
On 11/04/2024 18:54, Raphael Haas via Exim-users wrote:
Any hints and explanations would be highly welcome.
Can you get a run of the delivery of such a vacation-message-triggering
original with debug enabled?
The wrappers for the DB access functions have debug tracing, and the
"open" should
On 09/04/2024 20:08, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
At what point in the "life of the message" is the check for a
message-id header made, and at what point is one generated if missing?
While Exim is receiving the message off the wire (or stdin), after getting
all the headers and before starting
On 07/04/2024 14:18, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote:
(when the segfault happens)
gdb -c /.../exim.core /usr/local/sbin/exim
"bt" is the command to give to the gdb prompt for a stacktrace.
Gdb might offer to install all sorts of debug support packages for you
before it gives a command-prompt;
On 07/04/2024 04:32, Jim Pazarena via Exim-users wrote:
4.97.1
on FreeBSD 14.0p5
It is unclear to me how to find a newer version such as a testing version?
Is there a 4.97.2 forthcoming any time soon ? even a beta ?
I can't speak to FreeBSD release schedules, but
- can you set up for a core
On 04/04/2024 01:46, Daniel Golle wrote:
I've noticed that the %Y format warning issue discussed here has not
really been resolved and I was wondering what is the recommended way to
go about it.
Disabling all format security warnings doesn't really seem to be the
best idea,
You could
- ignore
On 21/03/2024 17:59, Glenn Gregorec via Exim-users wrote:
lookup yielded:
{BLF-CRYPT}$2a$05$xqWtKL1l.e3B98ISN0xbyOSROOIcMgAn6hIBZ7J9tHp/Wu28jvJfy::
So the "local_users" option setting is telling Exim to try to match the
local_part of the recipient to a local-part list which looks like
On 21/03/2024 14:33, Marco van Tol via Exim-users wrote:
I have tried to find a routers config that will do this:
- try to deliver an address over smtp
- if the returned error is permanent, try the next router
I looked at the options for the smtp transport, the generic routing options and
On 21/03/2024 07:23, Glenn Gregorec via Exim-users wrote:
vacationUser:
driver = redirect
domains =
${lookup{${lc:${domain}}}lsearch,ret=key{/usr/local/etc/exim/vacation-domains}}
local_parts =
On 20/03/2024 13:36, Marco van Tol via Exim-users wrote:
Is there an easy way to decide per recipient which router will be used, based
on the results of a callout/verify?
That's not the simplest way of doing what you want.
Or is there a different way to establish the same result?
Just
On 20/03/2024 22:09, Jerry Stuckle via Exim-users wrote:
However, it does handle emails differently depending on if you're using POP3 or
IMAP. The former places emails for a user in /var/mail while the latter places
emails in the user's home directory. And there are other differences in how
On 17/03/2024 10:53, Hardy via Exim-users wrote:
II do not find a hint to SEEN in the local/EDITME nor in
https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-building_and_installing_exim.html
No configuration needed for the compile; only current source.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On 14/03/2024 11:03, mhbeyle--- via Exim-users wrote:
Is there any documented change in the exim or gnutls versions that causes this
change in the logs?
I can't speak for GnuTLS, but it is not unlikely that its behaviour
changed between those versions.
For Exim, we do not bother documenting
On 13/03/2024 19:23, mhbeyle--- via Exim-users wrote:
I have several servers configured with exim4
That name is the Debian binary for Exim. Nobody else calls it that.
Version 3 of Exim went obsolete TWENTY YEARS ago.
- Sending to gmail: H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [142.250.27.26] TLS
On 10/03/2024 11:29, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
from log one can see that from_domain & dkim_domain has value before
rewrite (received message has rewritten values).
That matches my code-diving. You can't use (transport) header manipulation
results in the transport's dkim-control options
On 10/03/2024 08:51, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
@Jeremy:
Was that aimed at me? There is no "@" in my name.
Why aren't the extended restrictions for the "$run{}" attack the new defaults?
Because nobody thinks it useful enough?
(I suspect it was one of the attacks that led to the
On 09/03/2024 09:08, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
Dňa 9. marca 2024 7:15:17 UTC používateľ Andreas Metzler via Exim-users
napísal:
The DKIM section of "DKIM, SPF, SRS and DMARC" starts with
| Exim’s DKIM implementation allows for
|
| 1. Signing outgoing messages: This function is
On 08/03/2024 19:55, mhbeyle--- via Exim-users wrote:
when using transport_filter, Does the rest of the message remain unchanged?,
Does the DKIM-Signature remain valid even if the message ID has changed?
DKIM signing is done after a transport filter.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription
Tell your user they should use a proper mailing-list manager,
and follow best practices for bulk mail.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an
Trying to evade policy restrictions set by external sites is probably
a losing game, and liable to annoy them.
Perhaps, if your problem is a mix of bulk and not-bulk usage
(and it's the bulk ones resulting in these blocks) you could
pre-emptively use separate outbound IPs for the two classes?
I
On 04/03/2024 14:09, Fabien LUCE via Exim-users wrote:
Maybe in a more self explanatory way, each time the router is reached, it
launches the script that returns the .forward file to it.
A redirect router, using a "data" option, which has as its value
a "${run ...}" expansion, that calls the
On 02/03/2024 12:07, Dominic Preston via Exim-users wrote:
I've confirmed I can get a DNSSEC validated record for do.havedane.net
via dig, so why does Exim suggest otherwise?
Have you tried using Exim's debug facilities?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires
On 2/27/24 12:36, graeme vetterlein via Exim-users wrote:
Bit of a side note, but I tried many different ways (for about a day) to turn
on debugging , never really got anything useful. I'm using Debian (bullseye)
Perhaps you should ask on a Deb-specific forum.
+ in /etc/default/exim (set
On 25/02/2024 19:20, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
begin authenticators
PLAIN:
Strictly per the documentation this is a syntax error;
a macro definition lacking an '='.
It'll work with the current sourcecode.
Don't expect that to be always true in the future.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On 24/02/2024 15:53, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
Do you need the confog file and if so,
how to get rid of comments?
My rates for consultancy engagments are...
probably more than you want to pay.
You've been doing this for long enough
to know where the docs are.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
On 24/02/2024 15:02, Laura Williamson via Exim-users wrote:
Config question
I want to enable DKIM check for some local users/domains but not all, not
really sure how to do this
If you can identify the messages in ACL *before* the data time
- eg. in RCPT ACL - then the mast simple way is an
On 24/02/2024 02:12, graeme vetterlein via Exim-users wrote:
550 From header must end with @mydomain.com
Oh, I forgot to say: Look into "submission mode" and getting
plain account names qualified.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
On 24/02/2024 02:12, graeme vetterlein via Exim-users wrote:
The phrase "From header" is suitably vague, do they mean the "MAIL FROM"
envelope header
or the From header in the mail body headers ?
I'd guess the latter. I usually phrase it as "From: hders"
to try to make the point,
On 23/02/2024 20:38, The Doctor via Exim-users wrote:
/var/log/exim/mainlog:2024-02-23 12:29:53.262 [2255]
1rdbF2-0Zs-3yMA ** info@domain F=
P= R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=inbound.server
[inbound.server.ip]:25 I=[outbound.server]:52978
X=TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256 CV=no DN="":
On 22/02/2024 23:11, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Jim Pazarena via Exim-users wrote:
I really assumed that the response would have been "run a memtest on your
chassis".
On 22/02/2024 15:11, Jim Pazarena via Exim-users wrote:
is there anything on exim that
On 22/02/2024 15:11, Jim Pazarena via Exim-users wrote:
is there anything on exim that could -possibly- be triggering this ? SSL ?
(this is on FreeBSD 14.0)
Since you didn't say what version and patch level, that's a bit hard to answer.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration
On 16/02/2024 20:30, Johnnie W Adams via Exim-users wrote:
EPEL's exim 4.96|7 is not staying enabled through a reboot on my RHEL
7 servers.
Has anyone else seen this? Have you found a way to cope with it? It's
very strange. I'm a big fan of systemd and not used to it acting up.
On 10/02/2024 16:24, graeme vetterlein via Exim-users wrote:
mail_spool:
debug_print = "T: appendfile for $local_part@$domain"
driver = appendfile
file = /var/mail/$local_part_data
delivery_date_add
envelope_to_add
return_path_add
group = mail
mode = 0660
On 10/02/2024 05:58, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
I'm going to be replacing our mail nodes over the next few weeks and
I've been sequencing events in the move. It would be very handy if it were
possible to tell one of my nodes to keep accepting mail but to stop trying
to deliver
On 2/9/24 16:15, Larry Rosenman via Exim-users wrote:
On 02/09/2024 9:51 am, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 2/9/24 15:24, Larry Rosenman via Exim-users wrote:
I still get the no
A-R header message. THe header DOES show, however.
Those two items don't seem to match up!
The only way
On 2/9/24 15:24, Larry Rosenman via Exim-users wrote:
I still get the no
A-R header message. THe header DOES show, however.
Those two items don't seem to match up!
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
On 2/9/24 14:09, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
Should I add an Authentication-Results header for mail coming in via 587?
NO.
Or am I misusing/abusing ARC?
That.
ARC is for forwarding systems.
Probably per the real intent of ARC, yes.
But it's technically possible to regard what an
On 2/8/24 08:14, Sachin Bhardwaj via Exim-users wrote:
I want to try email threading in exim, can you please suggest how it can be
done or is there any documentation where I can read about that.
his is not the MTA's job; it is an MUA function.
Typically it reles on appropriate additions to a
On 2/6/24 08:55, Mateusz Krawczyk via Exim-users wrote:
10:50:46 275444 flushing headers buffer
10:50:46 275444 writing data block fd=8 size=8189 timeout=300
10:50:46 275444 tls_write(0xfcf658, 8189)
10:50:46 275444 SSL_write(0x119ac20, 0xfcf658, 8189)
10:50:46 275444 outbytes=8189 error=0
On 2/5/24 15:01, graeme vetterlein via Exim-users wrote:
But it occurs to me I'm rather "living on the edge" here I have multiple
cronjobs an I guess with a single edit I could end up with multiple writers. So I guess I
need to ensure maildrop and exim4 share a single view of locking .
On 1/29/24 03:41, Jerry Stuckle via Exim-users wrote:
I tried running exim with -bd -d+all. I started it
good
then ran it with the option -d+all -bP +local_domains
that bit is pointless
and redirected stderr to files for both.
And sent it a mail?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On 1/28/24 05:22, Jerry Stuckle via Exim-users wrote:
Is this too early for Exim to connect to the database?
Yes. Options are evaluated when needed; this one will probobly
only be needed when an inbound mail arrives.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
On 1/25/24 07:36, Niels Kobschätzki via Exim-users wrote:
I want to move my file lookups to database lookups (mariadb).
[...] I have a problem with (n)wildlsearch. Because I just don't
know how I could replace them.
For example a sender-lookup for:
^.*@(.*\.)?domain\.tld$
In postgres one wa
On 1/24/24 12:07, Mateusz Krawczyk via Exim-users wrote:
OS: CloudLinux 7
One of our user attempted to send a message using MS Outlook 2007
(Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0) to a large number of recipients (~700).
However, some kind of unintended loop occurred, resulting in the delivery
of the
On 1/20/24 23:39, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
2024-01-21 00:36:09 1rRKsd-0006BkG-0P8F bad internal_store_malloc request
(2147483632 bytes) from function_store_get 66
As you can clearly see, it wants to allocate 2 GB, for a 5-20 MB Email.
Open a bug against pcre2.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 1/15/24 22:41, Ken via Exim-users wrote:
The file begins:
fromlong-messy-str...@us-west-2.amazonses.com Thu Jan 1 00:00:01 1970
followed by message headers and the message body, ending with three
consecutive newlines.
Exim with a "-t" option will swallow that file on stdin, taking the
On 1/14/24 22:18, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
That would be great, once it will be included in main, for real
quarantine, where releasing message can be (near to) daily task.
To be fair, I only leant in that direction so that additionally
delivering as a notification to the admon/reviewer
On 1/14/24 20:01, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
If it will happen more often, one can store them bsmtp form
directly (but i never tried)... IIRC, the message has then extra
Received: header, but i it is no problem here...
Longterm, I'd think something like using the experimental
queuefile
On 1/14/24 18:30, Ken via Exim-users wrote:
Once in a while a legitimate sender manages to send an important message that
really, really looks like spam, so it gets saved (for a little while) in
/var/spool/sa-exim/SApermreject/new. I can adjust the filters so that sender's
messages will pass
On 1/13/24 19:46, Larry Rosenman via Exim-users wrote:
What am I missing here?
You have three lookups; we need to know which. My money's on the
one with the "sg" just from the complexity that adds...
a) run it with debug. We want to see the expansions getting done
bit-by-bit.
b) look into
On 1/12/24 08:14, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
[~]# mailq
9h 2.2K 1rO3sE-005JbF-1D-H <> *** frozen ***
xxx...@.de
They need to pick up commit 1d19531abc45 at the very least:
Date: Sun Nov 19 11:31:45 2023 +
Support old-format message_id spoolfiles for mailq / -bp.
On 1/5/24 21:02, Randy Bush via Exim-users wrote:
should psg.com have recognized that it was already properly DKIMmed and
not added the second?
AFAICS RFC 6376 places no restriction on a second signature,
even if it is done by the same organisation. The section
on verification mentions
On 1/4/24 05:35, itz--- via Exim-users wrote:
Consider a case like this:
some_transport:
transport_filter = /usr/local/bin/frobnicate_thing ${thing}
What happens when ${thing} expands to the empty string? Is it passed
as an empty argument to the program, does the program just not get
On 1/2/24 16:52, list2--- via Exim-users wrote:
4.95 and newer versions are compiling just fine and running smoothly, but there
is no delivery taking place mostly because of permission on mail folder issue.
Main log show arrival but panic log is another thing.
"2024-01-02 03:36:46
On 12/30/23 12:50, Jürgen Edner via Exim-users wrote:
13668 juer...@domain.de in "*@+local_domains :
lsearch*@;/var/mail2print/senderaddresses"? yes (matched "*@+local_domains")
Oh, so you're not actually using a lookup.
Could you?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration
On 12/29/23 10:18, Jürgen Edner via Exim-users wrote:
print_route:
driver = manualroute
local_part_prefix = print/
route_list = domain.de
senders= *@+local_domains : lsearch*@;/var/mail2print/senderaddresses
transport = print_transport
print_transport:
driver = pipe
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
