ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 21:03:49 -0400:
not Hochspier in the Pfalzerwald?
No.
wobo
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 03:09, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 21:03:49 -0400:
not Hochspier in the Pfalzerwald?
No.
wobo
Thank God I knew a Wolfgang there, about the same time frame (late
60s early 70s), I wouldn't want _my_ past to effect the present... G
ed tharp schrieb am 22 Sep 2003 07:17:11 -0400:
Thank God I knew a Wolfgang there, about the same time frame (late
60s early 70s), I wouldn't want _my_ past to effect the present... G
That bad? I still have a loose contact to one of the US guys from that
times, he's living in Dayton, Ohio.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:36:47 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
one be relevant here? It
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 4:25 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:36:47 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEti
quette
Would a link to one of the many
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 8:37 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
Give it
today to get some opinions, then I'll go with the majority.
A link to the RFC is good.
--
Richard Urwin
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as
this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more
thorough authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Not to be a spoil sport but isn't this a bit much? 6 or 7
points and requests from
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such
as this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a
more thorough authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Not to be a spoil sport but
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855
I personally also prefer the informal.
But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the
bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We could
expand the The 'rules' of internet usage... line to emphasize
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 01:37 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 4:25 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:36:47 -0700
James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
Anne Wilson schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:04:03 +0100:
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the
bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We could
expand the The 'rules' of internet usage... line to
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51 -0600:
Sorry for top-posting:
Nice text and covering nearly all aspects for a list noob.
Just a short hint at a missing word:
6.) Forget anything you may have been accustomed to in Windows. In
Windows if you clicked on an MP3 file for example,
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such
as this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a
more thorough authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Not to be a spoil sport but isn't this a bit much?
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 6:25 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Anne Wilson schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:04:03 +0100:
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the
bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We could
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 5:48 pm, Charlie M. wrote:
This is something that I add to all systems that I help new
converts with. snip
I'll try to compare this with the existing script and see what we have
missed. Give me a few hours, then check and comment as necessary
Anne
--
Registered Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51 -0600:
Sorry for top-posting:
Since it's going to happen again wobo it's OK. g
Nice text and covering nearly all aspects for a list noob.
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 11:55 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 5:48 pm, Charlie M. wrote:
This is something that I add to all systems that I help new
converts with. snip
I'll try to compare this with the existing script and see what we
On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 5:48 pm, Charlie M. wrote:
This is something that I add to all systems that I help new
converts with.
OK - We had covered quite a few of the points, but I've put on a
slightly shortened version of the section on asking for help -
shorter because your version has a
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 11:23, Charlie M. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51 -0600:
Sorry for top-posting:
Since it's going to happen again wobo it's OK. g
Nice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie, Hi WoBo,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, Charlie M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher was something else:
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 03:02 pm, Dick Gevers wrote:
Hi Charlie, Hi WoBo,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, Charlie M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher was something else:
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 02:28 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 11:23, Charlie M. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003
Dick Gevers schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:02:59 +:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, Charlie M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher
was something else:
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Charlie M. schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:48:51
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 18:20, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Dick Gevers schrieb am Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:02:59 +:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:23:36 -0600, Charlie M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher
was something else:
September 21, 2003 11:30 am, Wolfgang
Hallo WoBo,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:20:24 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about Re: [expert] hijacking: was Gopher was something else:
Damn! You caught me! I thought i could gather some DAU[1] points.
[1] German: Duemmster Anzunehmender User = Dumbest Credible User,
derived from
ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 18:30:48 -0400:
don't tell me them crazy Germans or American Military are letting WoBo
near Nuke Power OMG...g
Not the Germans, but the American Military actually did! I spent some
time being liason officer to a USAF group due to the fact that Germans
are
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 20:21, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
ed tharp schrieb am 21 Sep 2003 18:30:48 -0400:
don't tell me them crazy Germans or American Military are letting WoBo
near Nuke Power OMG...g
Not the Germans, but the American Military actually did! I spent some
time being
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:06, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Fri Sep 19, 2003 at 11:20:30AM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
tiquette
Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
Left to me, I think, and
On Sat Sep 20, 2003 at 12:28:16AM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
Anne looks good. Vincent, Who would be the one who could possibly make
a link from the sympa signup page to this page. Won't do us any good if
no one reads it. Better yet, would be if it could get put into the
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:26:24 +0100
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
tiquette
Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
Left to me, I think,
On Saturday 20 Sep 2003 8:51 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this one
be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Plain Text
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
Done,
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough
authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Plain Text
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough
authority.
HTML
http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
Plain Text
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
Done, thanks
What? No You gotta start Wiki-ing
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 13:32, Eric Huff wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such as this
one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a more thorough
authority.
HTML
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:49, Eric Huff wrote:
Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to reply to the
hijack problem. If you get started on the etiquette page, I'll put
that on if you like.
That would be great! Your responses on hijacking have been more
complete than
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:29, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:49, Eric Huff wrote:
Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to reply to the
hijack problem. If you get started on the etiquette page, I'll put
that on if you like.
That would be great!
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 10:50 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:29, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 20:49, Eric Huff wrote:
Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to
reply to the hijack problem. If you get started on the
etiquette page,
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
tiquette
Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
Left to me, I think, and I'll do it today. I haven't checked the
page yet, but if it's not there I'll
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 05:26, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 19 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
tiquette
Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
Left to me, I think, and I'll do it today. I
On Fri Sep 19, 2003 at 11:20:30AM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListE
tiquette
Also was the info on Hijacking left out intentionally?
Left to me, I think, and I'll do it today. I haven't checked the
page yet,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Eric Huff wrote:
Is there any way to get this sort of thing in the welcome letters? I
have to admit, i didn't know about hijacking til the 1st time i turned
threading on and saw my own hijack
Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well. :)
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 00:07, Bill Mullen wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Eric Huff wrote:
Is there any way to get this sort of thing in the welcome letters? I
have to admit, i didn't know about hijacking til the 1st time i turned
threading on and saw my own hijack
Excellent idea.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 03:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
Bill Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well.
:)
*That* drives me even more nuts than hijacking, and waay more nuts
than html, since I never even notice html unless I actually look at
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:29:05 -0700
Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Ok, Haywire is list nazi on newbie this week, i'll pipe in here.
I am *always* list Nazi, I just miss some sometimes ;-)
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
Is there any way to get this sort of thing in the welcome letters?
I have to admit, i didn't know about hijacking til the 1st time i
turned threading on and saw my own hijack
Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well.
:)
I had planned to put a list
On Thursday 18 Sep 2003 3:42 pm, Eric Huff wrote:
I had planned to put a list etiquette page on the twiki, but only
got as far as a place holder. Soon, one of us will get it there,
but it would still need visibility on welcome page for the absolute
newbies to see it.
Eric, I still have a
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 04:30, HaywireMac wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 03:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
Bill Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Excellent idea. Maybe something about unsetting 'Reply-To:', as well.
:)
*That* drives me even more nuts than hijacking, and waay more nuts
than html,
Eric, I still have a text file that I used when asked to reply to the
hijack problem. If you get started on the etiquette page, I'll put
that on if you like.
That would be great! Your responses on hijacking have been more
complete than mine...
Here is the etiquette page:
Ok, Haywire is list nazi on newbie this week, i'll pipe in here.
I have seen 3 hijacked threads today.
Please, when you want to start a new thread in a mailing list, click
new.
If you click reply and then change the subject, the email shows up in
the middle of the thread.
Is there any way to
49 matches
Mail list logo
