On Tuesday 28 May 2002 14:45, you wrote:
DrJung,
Does this mean I can now teach him that it's slash not forward slash?
*grin*
Nope...
... it's slash*dot* G
--
john in sydney
=
Mandrake Linux 8.2
Kernel version: 2.4.17-5mdk
Uptime: 2 days 7
In a make file that I have, I have the line...
include ..\..\examples\common.make
I then get the error makefile:18: ..\..\examples\common.make: No such
file or directory
Does linux not like this syntax (..\..\)for moving backwards through
directories?
Want to buy your Pack or Services
Kevin Fonner wrote:
Does linux not like this syntax (..\..\)for moving backwards through
directories?
No, those are back-slashes. Linux uses forward-slashes '/'
ie : ../../../ will work to bring you up 3 levels ..
-
Kevin O'Connor
People will be free to devote themselves to activities
On Mon, 27 May 2002 14:18:11 -0400
Kevin Fonner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a make file that I have, I have the line...
include ..\..\examples\common.make
I then get the error makefile:18: ..\..\examples\common.make: No such
file or directory
Does linux not like this syntax
oops!
It's funny how the simplest things stump you at times!
KevinO wrote:
Kevin Fonner wrote:
Does linux not like this syntax (..\..\)for moving backwards through
directories?
No, those are back-slashes. Linux uses forward-slashes '/'
ie : ../../../ will work to bring you up 3
James wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but ..\..\ is windows and ../../ is
Unix.
James
It is exceedingly difficult to correct you when you are right. It would
appear that the original poster for this thread is a windows' user
making the switch to Linux. Hooray for him!
drjung
On Mon, 27 May 2002 20:00:03 -0500
J. Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but ..\..\ is windows and ../../ is
Unix.
James
It is exceedingly difficult to correct you when you are right. It
would appear that the original poster
