the why is, just how private is it? is it connected to a lan? the internet?
what kinda server? why? to be secure thats why, to prevent screwing with
files you should not screw with.
On Thursday 06 June 2002 09:08 am, you wrote:
Well, yes, you'll have that. But why not use the machine? If
Well, yes, you'll have that. But why not use the machine? If the intent of
security tools is to keep the 'BAD GUYS tm' out, why are the 'GOOD GUYS tm'
unable to use the system as well?
Of Course I can login as a lesser user. However, I prefer root access, and if
I have to su - on my private
On Thursday 06 Jun 2002 2:08 pm, Albert E. Whale wrote:
Well, yes, you'll have that. But why not use the machine? If the intent
of security tools is to keep the 'BAD GUYS tm' out, why are the 'GOOD GUYS
tm' unable to use the system as well?
Of Course I can login as a lesser user. However,
Tom Badran wrote:
On Thursday 06 Jun 2002 2:08 pm, Albert E. Whale wrote:
Well, yes, you'll have that. But why not use the machine? If the intent
of security tools is to keep the 'BAD GUYS tm' out, why are the 'GOOD GUYS
tm' unable to use the system as well?
Of Course I can login as
Hmm, maybe I cannot type, but I could not login to the screensaver (user
Root) after the Slideshow utility took over for KDE. Any suggestions?
--
Albert E. Whale - CISSP
http://www.abs-comptech.com
--
ABS Computer Technology,
I realize I'm talking to a Senior Security Consultant, but my first
thought is don't login into X as root. Maybe it won't happen then.
Damon
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 10:01, Albert E. Whale wrote:
Hmm, maybe I cannot type, but I could not login to the screensaver (user
Root) after the Slideshow
