Re: End of Saga WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!

2009-02-10 Thread Charles Crayne
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:10:04 -0500 Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org wrote: It's 500+MB of updates. With rolling updates it's possible to scale that down, I think. Your post makes it seem like Fedora does not do any rolling updates. I haven't been keeping an exact count, but since F10's

Re: End of Saga WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!

2009-02-09 Thread Charles Crayne
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:04:16 -0800 (PST) Leslie Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.com wrote: With internet access the way it is, why not just do rolling updates? Sounds good, until the day when yum identifies 473 dependencies for the package you want to install. -- Chuck

Re: WHY I WANT TO STOP USING FEDORA!!!

2009-02-07 Thread Charles Crayne
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 23:12:12 -0500 Mike Chalmers mikechalmer...@gmail.com wrote: There must be someway to fix a situation, that needs to be fixed though. I just don't understand why they do not provide updates which I could imagine they could do instead of releasing a completely knew OS???

Re: Default route not set on boot up

2009-01-01 Thread Charles Crayne
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:01:15 -0500 Andrew Robinson awrobinson...@nc.rr.com wrote: The NETMASK in the ifcfg-wlan0 file is good. I noticed and fixed that problem during the installation. There is no NETMASK statement in the /etc/sysconfig/network file. Any other ideas? In my case, there were

Re: attansic tech Lan on board hardware

2008-12-30 Thread Charles Crayne
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:44:44 -0500 Robert Karge rkargeconsult...@gmail.com wrote: It's really a nice system however I can't get this LAN setup to function. At a guess, you have been bitten by the bug in the network configuration tool which incorrectly sets your network mask to be the same as

Re: dmraid mkinitrd under F10 x86_64 (No Puppies Harmed)

2008-12-16 Thread Charles Crayne
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:25:59 -0500 Raymond C. Rodgers sinful...@gmail.com wrote: The goal is to get dmraid activated automatically on boot like it once was, and not need to manually activate it and mount the nvidia_gdedfbbjp5 partition. With the info you provided, I think that I now

Re: dmraid mkinitrd under F10 x86_64 (No Puppies Harmed)

2008-12-15 Thread Charles Crayne
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:05:17 -0500 Raymond C. Rodgers sinful...@gmail.com wrote: No other suggestions? Although I have used software raid for several years now, I am not an expert in the subject. In particular, I have never needed to use mkinitrd, because I do not boot from the raid device. Nor

Re: dmraid mkinitrd under F10 x86_64 (No Puppies Harmed)

2008-12-15 Thread Charles Crayne
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:09:44 -0500 Raymond C. Rodgers sinful...@gmail.com wrote: From what I've seen, this can be done through initrd/mkinitrd some how, Apparently, I don't understand what you are trying to do. I am running software raid on three i386 machines and one x86_64 machine, and I

Re: Today's F10 update finishes with error

2008-12-09 Thread Charles Crayne
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:25:01 -0500 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As reported elsewhere, there's a problem with a set of packages that went into updates. Another set of updates is coming that will fix the problem, as well as a lot of discussion about how to make sure this doesn't

Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] Re: Fedora-livecd-list Digest, Vol 27, Issue 15

2007-07-16 Thread Charles Crayne
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:00:44 -0400 Elias Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hopefully that will help you accomplish what you need. Thank you. It is a step in the right direction, but what I really need to do is to work around the fact that my download quota is only about 400MB per day. The Fedora