Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2009, 04:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 07/16/2009 03:52 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
On a different note, is gnomebaker preferred over Xfburn? The latter
seems smaller, certainly.
But Xfburn drags in a whole lot of Xfce dependencies: Thunar,
xfce4-panel, xfconf,
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 2:29 PM
On 07/15/2009 11:55 PM, Globe Trotter wrote:
device-mapper: remove ioctl failed: Device or resource busy
Command failed
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/imgcreate/errors.py:45: DeprecationWarning:
BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6
return unicode(self.message)
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com
Cc: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date
of the burger-man while Fedora boots?
T
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com
Cc: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance
On 07/16/2009 03:29 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
OK, rebooting did clear out stuff and I was able to get it to install and
work. I modified the .ks file (and this is attached).
This may be because of what I brought in (xfburn instead of gnomebaker,
claws-mail instead of sylpheed, fetchmail and
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: sunda...@fedoraproject.org, fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 5:59 PM
OK, rebooting did clear out stuff and
I was able to get
On 07/16/2009 03:52 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
Thanks very much! Btw, is there any issue with using the F bubble, since this
is not a real F spin, instead of the burger man?
For private use, it doesn't matter. For redistribution, you shouldn't
use the primary Fedora trademarks including the
OK, thanks. Btw, I have an old program (of my own) which uses libssl.so.7.
Where do I find this?
T
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Community assistance
On 07/16/2009 04:13 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
OK, thanks. Btw, I have an old program (of my own) which uses libssl.so.7.
Where do I find this?
That is part of an older version of openssl. If you try to install it,
it would conflict with the newer version. It is possible to take the
srpm and
On 07/12/2009 02:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
Well, one does:
febootstrap fedora-10 ./f10
Then, I am guessing,
febootstrap-to-initramfs ./f10 initrd.img
And this is where I come to a full stop.then what?
I understand this is a different option: not clear what to
do
On 12/07/09 05:56, Globe Trotter wrote:
OK, So i did the following:
snip
Just occured to me, the livecd list, may be able to help a little more
for you: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
Regards,
Frank
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
On 07/11/2009 04:29 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
Then you should forget other users testing and evaluating it and gauging
response
Thank you for your opinion but I have enough feedback necessary. We have
enough stats indicating that a large majority of users to continue to
use 32-bit systems and
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com
Cc: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date
On 07/11/2009 09:40 PM, Globe Trotter wrote:
So, your response to Christoph when you appropriated his hard work, reducing
him to a byline, was just something made up to extricate yourself from an
indefensible situation?
What is so indefensible about saying that I don't have a 64-bit
On 07/11/2009 11:01 PM, Globe Trotter wrote:
No question, but the line you took out from my response says that there is no
way you can measure interest in 64-bit or other LXDE since there is no way
this can be gauged since it is not provided.
Yes, but my point is that since 32-bit downloads
What is so indefensible about saying that I don't have a
64-bit system
to create a 64-bit variant for you nor do I have the time
to test more
variants? As far as I can see, you want a 64-bit
variant and you seem
upset that I didn't volunteer my time to create that for
you.
Actually, I
Yes, but the step-by-step instructions are far from
clear. Also, I would perhaps add some of my own rpms that i
believe should be in...
What is not clear?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD
If you have specific questions, feel free to ask.
1. I guess I
On 07/11/2009 11:54 PM, Globe Trotter wrote:
What is not clear?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD
If you have specific questions, feel free to ask.
1. I guess I need F11 running to use your ks?
Yes. That would be the easiest way to do it.
2. Do I also need
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:24:39 -0700,
Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com wrote:
2. Do I also need all those rpms in the ks installed?
When building a livecd (or livedvd) image you don't need to have every
package that will end up in the image installed on the system doing the
build. The
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 2:29 PM
On 07/12/2009 12:36 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
So, is it possible to run F10 and create a F11 LiveCD? If so, how?
It should be possible using febootstrap.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/febootstrap/
I haven't tried that.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com
Cc: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date
On 07/12/2009 02:10 AM, Globe Trotter wrote:
Where does one put in the ks file?
Not sure I understand the question. You can use any path.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com
Cc: encouragement and advice for using
Fedora.Community assistance fedora-list@redhat.com
OK, So i did the following:
$ febootstrap --groupinstall=LXDE fedora-11 ./f11
and got the following:
...
zlib.x86_64 0:1.2.3-22.fc11
Failed:
filesystem.x86_64 0:2.4.21-1.fc11
On 10/07/09 06:48, Globe Trotter wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know where I could download a 64-bit LXDE spin/remix for Fedora?
Sort of like the one created by Rahul for 386-based processors?
Many thanks,
T
No, it's just not ready for a solo career as yet.
Best bet, would be to install
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 3:10 AM
On 10/07/09 06:48, Globe Trotter
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know where I could
On 10/07/09 16:34, Globe Trotter wrote:
Thanks! I do not understand why the 64-bit version was not released (along
with the 32-bit version),
especially since one of the goals was to gauge interest and gather
feedback.
Not for me to speculate on that.
Check with:
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 11:41 AM
On 10/07/09 16:34, Globe Trotter
wrote:
Thanks! I do not understand why the 64
On 07/10/2009 10:01 PM, Globe Trotter wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Not for me to speculate on that.
Neither for me. It just does not make sense at all
It does for me. I choose to build it only for x86_32 since that's what I
had quick access
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Friday, July 10, 2009, 2:23 PM
On 07
Hi,
Does anyone know where I could download a 64-bit LXDE spin/remix for Fedora?
Sort of like the one created by Rahul for 386-based processors?
Many thanks,
T
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
33 matches
Mail list logo
