On 2024-06-05 12:47 am, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Tuesday 2024-06-04 23:41:05 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Similar to select filter for video - it can only pass through or drop frames
---
libavfilter/trim.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavfilter/trim.c b
Similar to select filter for video - it can only pass through or drop frames
---
libavfilter/trim.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavfilter/trim.c b/libavfilter/trim.c
index 4c1a2b4f48..4afc4c74bb 100644
--- a/libavfilter/trim.c
+++ b/libavfilter/trim.c
@@ -364,6 +364,7 @@
On 2024-05-31 09:07 pm, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 8:32 AM Gyan Doshi wrote:
Decoding is no longer possible as the decoder wrapper was removed
in 60ccb3fe78
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
Decoding is no longer possible as the decoder wrapper was removed
in 60ccb3fe78
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 96b181fd21..6c5b8aab9a 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ External library support:
On 2024-05-01 12:18 pm, Yannis Gerlach wrote:
The speed option allows to have a constant (per frame) change of hue.
This allows for an easy way of creating an color changing effect
without relying on somewhat complicated expressions.
Signed-off-by: Yannis Gerlach
---
On 2024-04-24 04:21 pm, Niklas Haas wrote:
As discussed in my previous series for fixing scale2ref[1], this filter
is fundamentally broken, and the only real fix would be to switch to
activate(), or ideally FFFrameSync.
[1] https://ffmpeg.org//pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2024-March/323382.html
On 2024-04-17 05:25 pm, James Almer wrote:
On 4/17/2024 8:31 AM, Gyan Doshi wrote:
sum_delta_pts is unused since 3b358f151d
---
libavformat/ivfenc.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/ivfenc.c b/libavformat/ivfenc.c
index 09782eecd6
sum_delta_pts is unused since 3b358f151d
---
libavformat/ivfenc.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/ivfenc.c b/libavformat/ivfenc.c
index 09782eecd6..9feaea3516 100644
--- a/libavformat/ivfenc.c
+++ b/libavformat/ivfenc.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
On 2024-04-10 02:57 pm, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Tuesday 2024-04-09 10:36:05 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
[...]
I am pointing that for the burden, I am not offering to do the same for
free for the people who are so short-sighted they feel entitled to block
software-defined radio,
Ping x2.
On 2024-04-02 10:55 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Ping.
As the TC rules matter has been concluded, this should go ahead.
Regards,
Gyan
On 2024-02-17 05:15 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Issue:
Patch: avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding
URL:
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch
On 2024-04-05 10:20 pm, Dennis Mungai wrote:
Does this imply that down the line, with this and additional patchsets,
that FFmpeg can handle tasks such as stream copy and filtering in the same
invocation?
What do you mean? If you map a stream twice, you already can do that now.
Regards,
Ping.
As the TC rules matter has been concluded, this should go ahead.
Regards,
Gyan
On 2024-02-17 05:15 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Issue:
Patch: avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding
URL:
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20240127103854.9971-1-ffm...@gyani.pro/
The issue
On 2024-04-01 04:46 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Hi all,
the vote has now ended with 23 votes cast, results are available at
https://vote.ffmpeg.org/cgi-bin/civs/results.pl?id=E_a6be1eb156d0e589
The winning option is 'Anton', i.e. my proposal. Voting data as reported
by CIVS is attached to this
On 2024-03-29 02:05 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
---
libavformat/movenc.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/movenc.c b/libavformat/movenc.c
index b97c479cc4..30cfbf6e74 100644
--- a/libavformat/movenc.c
+++ b/libavformat/movenc.c
@@
On 2024-03-25 03:11 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-03-22 14:05:05)
Please do post the final text and options a day in advance.
I have now created the poll, but not started it yet (the text and
options can still be edited). It looks like this:
The description, my option
On 2024-03-22 06:22 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Michael,
following up on the previous discussion in this thread - if you,
personally, would like to vote for a different option than those
suggested so far, please propose one.
I am not going to add a large number of options that nobody actually
-devel/2024-February/321564.html
On 2024-03-03 12:52 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
---
doc/community.texi | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/community.texi b/doc/community.texi
index 90d2b6f366..8d5722bd7f 100644
--- a/doc/community.texi
+++ b/doc
On 2024-03-18 04:11 pm, Liu Steven wrote:
On Mar 18, 2024, at 18:11, Gyan Doshi wrote:
---
tests/fate/lavf-container.mak | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/fate/lavf-container.mak b/tests/fate/lavf-container.mak
index b18ed2362b..7a925117c3 100644
---
tests/fate/lavf-container.mak | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/fate/lavf-container.mak b/tests/fate/lavf-container.mak
index b18ed2362b..7a925117c3 100644
--- a/tests/fate/lavf-container.mak
+++ b/tests/fate/lavf-container.mak
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
On 2024-03-16 02:02 pm, Marton Balint wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Gyan Doshi wrote:
8559cce3c3 made the bitstream check generic using a LUT.
However, one of the comparisons which involves a bitwise AND
and equality check is faulty due to operator precedence.
First reported and analysed
8559cce3c3 made the bitstream check generic using a LUT.
However, one of the comparisons which involves a bitwise AND
and equality check is faulty due to operator precedence.
First reported and analysed at
https://github.com/streamlink/streamlink/issues/5876
Fixes #10908
---
On 2024-03-14 03:46 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-03-13 08:49:52)
Are there any limitations to loopback decoding e.g. would a vpx w/alpha
encode be decoded back to a alpha pix fmt?
I don't know how vpx alpha works, was it a separate stream in the
demuxer or something
On 2024-03-13 05:54 pm, Niklas Haas wrote:
From: Niklas Haas
This filter's existing design has a number of issues:
- There is no guarantee whatsoever about the order in which frames are
pushed onto the main and ref link, due to this being entirely
dependent on the order in which
On 2024-03-13 05:54 pm, Niklas Haas wrote:
From: Niklas Haas
Analogous to the "scale" filter, which this is practically identical
with.
---
libavfilter/avfilter.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/avfilter.c b/libavfilter/avfilter.c
index
On 2024-03-13 12:57 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
ffmpeg | branch: master | Anton Khirnov | Mon Feb 19
10:27:44 2024 +0100| [a9193f7b7d65aafa326e25571c6672636a8ee3d2] | committer: Anton
Khirnov
fftools/ffmpeg: add loopback decoding
...
+E.g. the following example:
+
+@example
+ffmpeg -i
On 2024-03-12 09:15 pm, Lynne wrote:
Mar 12, 2024, 05:16 by ffm...@gyani.pro:
Fixes #10900
---
configure | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 05f8283af9..e0b5bcf589 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -3076,6 +3076,7 @@
On 2024-03-12 04:25 pm, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
---
doc/metadata.texi | 1 +
doc/muxers.texi | 16
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/metadata.texi b/doc/metadata.texi
index be91059a98..e081da7735 100644
--- a/doc/metadata.texi
+++ b/doc/metadata.texi
Fixes #10900
---
configure | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 05f8283af9..e0b5bcf589 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -3076,6 +3076,7 @@ nvdec_deps="ffnvcodec"
vaapi_x11_deps="xlib_x11"
videotoolbox_hwaccel_deps="videotoolbox pthreads"
On 2024-03-06 11:02 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-03-01 07:41 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
At present, consume_update evaluates timeline state on all links for
a multi-input filter. This can lead to the filter being incorrectly
en/dis-abled when evaluation on a frame on a secondary link leads
On 2024-03-01 07:41 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
At present, consume_update evaluates timeline state on all links for
a multi-input filter. This can lead to the filter being incorrectly
en/dis-abled when evaluation on a frame on a secondary link leads to
a different result than the frame
On 2024-03-03 07:04 am, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 11:07:40AM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-03-01 11:03 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
* Any member of the TC who had a strong opinion on the question raised
before it was raised should recuse themselves
---
doc/community.texi | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/community.texi b/doc/community.texi
index 90d2b6f366..8d5722bd7f 100644
--- a/doc/community.texi
+++ b/doc/community.texi
@@ -82,7 +82,20 @@ The TC has 2 modes of operation: a RFC one
On 2024-03-01 11:03 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
* Any member of the TC who had a strong opinion on the question raised
before it was raised should recuse themselves.
In particular, must recuse themselves any member of the TC who:
- participated in the discussion (on the ML, on IRC or
At present, consume_update evaluates timeline state on all links for
a multi-input filter. This can lead to the filter being incorrectly
en/dis-abled when evaluation on a frame on a secondary link leads to
a different result than the frame on the current main link next in
line for processing.
---
Unbreaks movenc compilation in minimal configuration.
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 197f762b58..2d0e6a444a 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -3554,7 +3554,7 @@ mlp_demuxer_select="mlp_parser"
On 2024-02-23 01:26 pm, Nicolas George wrote:
Anton Khirnov (12024-02-22):
In my updated proposal, based on comments by Niklas and Rémi, I'm
leaving it up to the TC member in question, based on the assumption that
TC members are honest.
A "stronger" version could conceivably leave it to CC
On 2024-02-20 04:39 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
As for determining conflict of interest in case of dishonest TC
members, I don't think there is a general solution for it.
This is not about dishonesty. Imagine a TC member genuinely does not
self-assess or agree to a conflict of interest, does
On 2024-02-20 02:20 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
So IMO the only case that needs to be excluded is 6) - an actual
conflict of interest. I therefore propose the following wording changes:
--- a/doc/community.texi
+++ b/doc/community.texi
-If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that
On 2024-02-19 08:00 pm, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:11 AM Gyan Doshi wrote:
The TC is invoked when there's an intractable dispute. So the dispute
precedes the TC activity hence the parties to the dispute are the main
opposing participants at the venue of the dispute
On 2024-02-19 03:16 am, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:02 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-02-18 11:33 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-18 05:06:30)
b) what "maximalist" interpretation?
A non-maximalist interpretation would be that a TC memb
On 2024-02-18 11:33 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-18 05:06:30)
b) what "maximalist" interpretation?
A non-maximalist interpretation would be that a TC member is only
excluded from voting when they authored the patch that is being
disputed.
If the promulga
On 2024-02-18 01:25 am, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 13:37:38)
On 2024-02-17 05:52 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 12:46:27)
As a TC member who is part of the disagreement, I believe your
participation is recused.
No, I do not think &qu
On 2024-02-17 07:12 pm, Niklas Haas wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:45:57 +0530 Gyan Doshi wrote:
Whilst s302m multiple substreams I haven't seen, Dolby E streams internally
contain multiple programs, often 5.1 and a 2.0 downmix.
That is downstream of the Dolby-E decoder and user will have
On 2024-02-17 05:31 pm, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024, 11:46 Gyan Doshi, wrote:
Issue:
Patch: avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding
URL:
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20240127103854.9971-1-ffm...@gyani.pro/
The issue needing resolution is whether
On 2024-02-17 05:52 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 12:46:27)
As a TC member who is part of the disagreement, I believe your
participation is recused.
No, I do not think "TC members who commented on a patch lose their right
to vote" is a reasonable inte
On 2024-02-16 02:33 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-15 17:47:49)
This patch facilitates a certain productive use of ffmpeg with respect
to processing of live inputs that wasn't possible earlier,
and which currently is being used successfully by multiple people over
Issue:
Patch: avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding
URL:
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20240127103854.9971-1-ffm...@gyani.pro/
The issue needing resolution is whether the patch should be added to the
existing s302m decoder or should that decoder
be removed and all old
On 2024-02-16 07:25 pm, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
On 2024-02-15 04:17 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the delay, I've been busy fixing things for the release
Quoting Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel (2024-01-29 05:00:33)
On 2024-01-28 04:24 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote
On 2024-02-16 01:56 am, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 16:48, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-02-15 09:40 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-15 13:31:59)
On 2024-02-15 04:17 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the delay, I've been busy fixing things
On 2024-02-15 09:40 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-15 13:31:59)
On 2024-02-15 04:17 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the delay, I've been busy fixing things for the release
Quoting Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel (2024-01-29 05:00:33)
On 2024-01-28 04:24 pm, Anton
On 2024-02-15 04:17 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the delay, I've been busy fixing things for the release
Quoting Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel (2024-01-29 05:00:33)
On 2024-01-28 04:24 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
a) it would mean essentially inlining this decoder in the demuxer.
Why
On 2024-01-27 04:08 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E decoding.
Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs.
Plan to push in 3 days, barring objections.
Regards,
Gyan
---
configure | 1 +
doc
On 2024-02-02 03:34 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-01-29 10:30 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Existing use of strtoll can lead to ERANGE errors leading to incorrect
storage of UMID.
Plan to push tomorrow.
Pushed as 7375a6ca7b4a4b223a71f85a772c64a34e60eabe
Regards,
Gyan
On 2024-01-29 10:30 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Existing use of strtoll can lead to ERANGE errors leading to incorrect
storage of UMID.
Plan to push tomorrow.
Regards,
Gyan
---
libavformat/wavenc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/wavenc.c b
On 2024-01-31 09:49 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2024-01-26 07:39 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
The video param change check will print loglines below debug level
for each frame which is different from the inlink parameters. This
can spam the console. It is now printed at warning level once for
each
On 2024-01-26 07:39 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
The video param change check will print loglines below debug level
for each frame which is different from the inlink parameters. This
can spam the console. It is now printed at warning level once for
each param change else it is kept at debug level
On 2024-01-29 02:57 pm, Nicolas Gaullier wrote:
On 2024-01-28 04:24 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-01-26 05:23:50)
On 2024-01-25 06:47 pm, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
On 2024-01-25 10:29 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
Set up framework for non-PCM
Existing use of strtoll can lead to ERANGE errors leading to incorrect
storage of UMID.
---
libavformat/wavenc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/wavenc.c b/libavformat/wavenc.c
index 82acb9ef0f..a41f40b449 100644
--- a/libavformat/wavenc.c
+++
On 2024-01-28 04:24 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-01-26 05:23:50)
On 2024-01-25 06:47 pm, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
On 2024-01-25 10:29 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E
Three tests, one each for
1) 16-bit Dolby-E words in 20-bits AES3 words
2) 20-bit Dolby-E words in 20-bits AES3 words
3) 20-bit Dolby-E words in 24-bits AES3 words
---
tests/fate/acodec.mak | 15 ++
tests/ref/acodec/s302m-20-dolbye-16 | 221
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E decoding.
Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs.
---
configure | 1 +
doc/decoders.texi | 40 +++
libavcodec/s302m.c | 596 +
3 files
The video param change check will print loglines below debug level
for each frame which is different from the inlink parameters. This
can spam the console. It is now printed at warning level once for
each param change else it is kept at debug level.
Partially addresses #10823
---
On 2024-01-25 06:47 pm, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
On 2024-01-25 10:29 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E decoding.
Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs.
---
configure
On 2024-01-25 10:29 am, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Gyan Doshi:
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E decoding.
Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs.
---
configure | 1 +
doc/decoders.texi | 40 +++
libavcodec
On 2024-01-23 03:58 pm, Nicolas Gaullier wrote:
+#define IS_NONPCMSYNC_16(state) ((state & 0x00) ==
NONPCMSYNC_16MARKER)
Is this single 32 bits marker enough to avoid a fake detection ?
It will have to do. The modal number of payload packets expected in a
single s302m
On 2024-01-23 01:26 pm, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 06:50, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E decoding.
Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs.
Does this handle a Dolby E packet spanning
Three tests, one each for
1) 16-bit Dolby-E words in 20-bits AES3 words
2) 20-bit Dolby-E words in 20-bits AES3 words
3) 20-bit Dolby-E words in 24-bits AES3 words
---
tests/fate/acodec.mak | 15 ++
tests/ref/acodec/s302m-20-dolbye-16 | 221
Set up framework for non-PCM decoding in-place and
add support for Dolby-E decoding.
Useful for direct transcoding of non-PCM audio in live inputs.
---
configure | 1 +
doc/decoders.texi | 40 +++
libavcodec/s302m.c | 609 +
3 files
On 2024-01-08 08:23 am, Zhao Zhili wrote:
On Jan 7, 2024, at 20:05, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Sunday 2024-01-07 13:10:44 +0800, Zhao Zhili wrote:
[...]
I'm not blocking the patch, however, I'm not sure whether the gain
outweighs the effort for such large code changes. It's very
On 2024-01-03 03:46 pm, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Am 03.01.24 um 11:10 schrieb Gyan Doshi:
On 2024-01-03 02:28 pm, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Am 01.12.23 um 12:37 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:24 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2023-09-25 11:35 pm
On 2024-01-03 02:28 pm, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Am 01.12.23 um 12:37 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:24 PM Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2023-09-25 11:35 pm, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 9/11/23, Harshit Karwal wrote:
1. Replaced ring buffer ADT with AVAudioFifo from
On 2024-01-01 09:33 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2023-12-31 01:03 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
The function lf_db_new was deprecated in lensfun 09dcd3e7ad in 2017
in favour of lf_db_create. The AVfilter was adjusted in 8b78eb312d
but the configure check wasn't changed.
lensfun removed lf_db_new
On 2023-12-31 01:03 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
The function lf_db_new was deprecated in lensfun 09dcd3e7ad in 2017
in favour of lf_db_create. The AVfilter was adjusted in 8b78eb312d
but the configure check wasn't changed.
lensfun removed lf_db_new declaration in lf 35c0017593 so configure
fails
The function lf_db_new was deprecated in lensfun 09dcd3e7ad in 2017
in favour of lf_db_create. The AVfilter was adjusted in 8b78eb312d
but the configure check wasn't changed.
lensfun removed lf_db_new declaration in lf 35c0017593 so configure
fails to find lensfun.
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file
On 2023-12-26 09:25 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Plan to push in 48h, barring objections.
Pushed as c1340f3439ef4eba34e8e51e1f7c0bf789e3256a
Regards,
Gyan
On 2023-12-21 03:31 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
2c2a167ca7 forced WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE for all LPCM streams with greater
than 16 bits per sample
Plan to push in 48h, barring objections.
On 2023-12-21 03:31 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
2c2a167ca7 forced WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE for all LPCM streams with greater
than 16 bits per sample. However, WAVEFORMATEX allows IEEE Float samples
or any depth where raw depth == coded depth, see Remarks section
2c2a167ca7 forced WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE for all LPCM streams with greater
than 16 bits per sample. However, WAVEFORMATEX allows IEEE Float samples
or any depth where raw depth == coded depth, see Remarks section at
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/mmreg/ns-mmreg-waveformatex
and
2c2a167ca7 forced WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE for all LPCM streams with greater
than 16 bits per sample. However, WAVEFORMATEX allows IEEE Float samples
or any depth where raw depth == coded depth, see Remarks section at
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/mmreg/ns-mmreg-waveformatex
and
On 2023-12-18 09:31 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2023-12-16 03:44 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using hard compensation
On 2023-12-16 03:44 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using hard compensation)
then upon first encountering a delay where a soft
/src/consulting
@@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ E.g.:
-
-
Steven Liu
@@ -121,6 +119,8 @@ E.g.:
+
+
Gyan Doshi
--
2.39.1
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https
On 2023-12-15 11:46 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:30:46PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using hard compensation)
then upon first encountering a delay where a soft compensation is
required, swr_set_compensation
On 2023-12-15 12:43 am, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 04:50:08PM +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using hard compensation)
then upon first encountering a delay where a soft compensation is
required, swr_set_compensation
On 2023-12-14 04:56 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Gyan Doshi (2023-12-14 12:22:51)
On 2023-12-14 02:48 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 07:41:18AM +, Anton Khirnov wrote:
ffmpeg | branch: master | Anton Khirnov | Tue Jul 18
16:37:52 2023 +0200
On 2023-12-14 02:48 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 07:41:18AM +, Anton Khirnov wrote:
ffmpeg | branch: master | Anton Khirnov | Tue Jul 18
16:37:52 2023 +0200| [d119ae2fd82a494d9430ff4d4fc262961a68c598] | committer: Anton
Khirnov
fftools/ffmpeg: convert to a threaded
During a resampling operation where
1) user has specified first_pts
2) SWR_FLAG_RESAMPLE is not set initially (directly or otherwise)
3) first_pts has been fulfilled (always using hard compensation)
then upon first encountering a delay where a soft compensation is
required, swr_set_compensation
On 2023-12-11 09:13 am, Marth64 wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marth64
---
doc/ffmpeg.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg.texi b/doc/ffmpeg.texi
index 6bcedd76d5..36fdaef879 100644
--- a/doc/ffmpeg.texi
+++ b/doc/ffmpeg.texi
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ of
On 2023-12-10 06:03 am, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Friday 2023-12-08 13:05:43 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
As per the doc, prev_selected_n should be NAN at the start.
However, this was never set.
---
libavfilter/f_select.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavfilter
As per the doc, prev_selected_n should be NAN at the start.
However, this was never set.
---
libavfilter/f_select.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavfilter/f_select.c b/libavfilter/f_select.c
index 47e36f0014..109dae403a 100644
--- a/libavfilter/f_select.c
+++
On 2023-09-25 11:35 pm, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 9/11/23, Harshit Karwal wrote:
1. Replaced ring buffer ADT with AVAudioFifo from libavutil/audio_fifo.h
2. Fixed potential freeing of uninitialised pointers in uninit
3. Minor changes like removing unused headers
Will apply with more fixes
On 2023-11-30 03:25 am, James Almer wrote:
On 11/28/2023 1:00 AM, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2023-11-28 12:13 am, James Almer wrote:
Packets will be passed to the bsf immediately after being generated
by a
demuxer, and no further data will be read from the input until all
packets
have been
On 2023-11-28 12:13 am, James Almer wrote:
Packets will be passed to the bsf immediately after being generated by a
demuxer, and no further data will be read from the input until all packets
have been returned by the bsf.
Do you plan to add a lib/cli option for user-specified insertions?
On 2023-11-27 11:38 pm, Kyle Swanson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 1:29 AM Gyan Doshi wrote:
Will push soon.
This filter can take any number of models now, each defining their own
pooling methods. Looking at the docs now, I can see that it's not
clear how to do this, I'll need to send
Will push soon.
On 2023-11-26 04:08 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
3d29724c00 removed the doc entry for the option pool while adding
a parser function for it at the same time!
The option remains available and undeprecated.
---
doc/filters.texi | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git
3d29724c00 removed the doc entry for the option pool while adding
a parser function for it at the same time!
The option remains available and undeprecated.
---
doc/filters.texi | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
index
On 2023-11-24 11:13 am, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
From: Haihao Xiang
Signed-off-by: Haihao Xiang
---
doc/ffmpeg.texi | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg.texi b/doc/ffmpeg.texi
index 68363ae045..5296b75a4e 100644
--- a/doc/ffmpeg.texi
+++
On 2023-11-19 05:19 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
---
doc/filters.texi | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
index 38615e4f18..bd4e4ca8f7 100644
--- a/doc/filters.texi
+++ b/doc/filters.texi
@@ -28163,7 +28163,12 @@ Only
On 2023-11-12 08:27 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
On 2023-11-08 10:25 am, Gyan Doshi wrote:
Setting of external param 'force_key_frames' was added in 7bcc1b4eb8.
It is available since v1.1.0 but ffmpeg allows linking against v0.9.0.
Plan to push tomorrow, barring objections.
Pushed
1 - 100 of 1194 matches
Mail list logo
