On 21/03/2024 10:40, Marton Balint wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Tobias Rapp wrote:
On 19/03/2024 20:14, Marton Balint wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:57:29PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote:
- Only parse the defined masks in
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Tobias Rapp wrote:
On 19/03/2024 20:14, Marton Balint wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:57:29PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote:
- Only parse the defined masks in dwChannelMask, unless
strict_std_compliance
is less
On 19/03/2024 20:14, Marton Balint wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:57:29PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote:
- Only parse the defined masks in dwChannelMask, unless
strict_std_compliance
is less than normal. This matches with the behaviour of
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:57:29PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote:
- Only parse the defined masks in dwChannelMask, unless strict_std_compliance
is less than normal. This matches with the behaviour of the wav muxer.
- Ignore additional bits in
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:57:29PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote:
> - Only parse the defined masks in dwChannelMask, unless strict_std_compliance
> is less than normal. This matches with the behaviour of the wav muxer.
> - Ignore additional bits in dwChannelMasks as the MS documentation suggests
>
- Only parse the defined masks in dwChannelMask, unless strict_std_compliance
is less than normal. This matches with the behaviour of the wav muxer.
- Ignore additional bits in dwChannelMasks as the MS documentation suggests [1]
- Assume UNKNOWN channels for missing bits as the MS documentation
