On Monday, 31 October 2022 14:03:21 CET Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Neal Gompa (2022-10-30 22:04:42)
>
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 4:10 PM Michael Niedermayer
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael
Quoting Neal Gompa (2022-10-30 22:04:42)
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 4:10 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > According to our
>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 4:10 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > According to our
> > > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 4:16 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > According to our
> > > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams
> > >
> > >
On 29.10.2022 20:29, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
Hi
According to our
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams
Noone and nothing is using 5.0
should i make another release of 5.0 ?
should i move 5.0 to olddownloads ?
does anyone use it ? plan
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 2:23 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> According to our
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams
>
> Noone and nothing is using 5.0
> should i make another release of 5.0 ?
> should i move 5.0 to olddownloads ?
>
> does anyone use it ? plan to use it or know of
+1 for moving it to the old downloads
Best regards, Reto
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject
On 28.10.2022 20:23, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
According to our
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams
Noone and nothing is using 5.0
should i make another release of 5.0 ?
should i move 5.0 to olddownloads ?
does anyone use it ? plan to use it or know of someone using it ?
thx
I see
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 09:44:58PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 20:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 8:40 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
>
> On Mon, Apr 2
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > Do people prefer that 5.0
On 4/25/2022 2:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
My understanding of the consensus
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
>> > Or something else ?
>>
>> My
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> > Or something else ?
>
> My understanding of the consensus was;
> - 5.0 in Dec/Jan
> - 5.1 in Jul with
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> Or something else ?
My understanding of the consensus was;
- 5.0 in Dec/Jan
- 5.1 in Jul with API additions, but no ABI/behavior breakage
- 6.0 in Dec 22 with ABI/API/behavior
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul
> B Mahol
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 10:01 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
>
> On Mon, Apr 25,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:48 AM Soft Works wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> > Michael Niedermayer
> > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 6:36 PM
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > de...@ffmpeg.
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Michael Niedermayer
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 6:36 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS
>
> Hi all
>
> 2022年4月24日 00:36，Michael Niedermayer 写道：
>
> Hi all
>
> Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> Or something else ?
I think 5.0 or 5.1 is ok.
Because LTS is just for stable, I am looking at maillist,
There have lots of patch will change lots of code every version,
So
On 2022-04-23 10:06 pm, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
A LTS release should be prospectively designated.
That way, devs can prioritze their efforts and enterprise users can plan
a roadmap for deployment.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:15 PM James Almer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/23/2022 3:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:40 PM James Almer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
On 4/23/2022 3:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:40 PM James Almer wrote:
On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
Thanks
5.0 lacks the new channel layout API, and making that
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:40 PM James Almer wrote:
>
> On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
> > Or something else ?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> 5.0 lacks the new channel layout API, and making that an LTS will give
>
On 4/23/2022 1:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
Thanks
5.0 lacks the new channel layout API, and making that an LTS will give
projects less incentive to migrate, so IMO, 5.1 (or a newer one) should
be the
Hi all
Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ?
Or something else ?
Thanks
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Nations do behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.
-- Abba Eban
signature.asc
Description: PGP
26 matches
Mail list logo
