On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:39:50AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> please delete:
>
> comment 14 in ticket 2104
> comment 6 in ticket 2776
> user "bunnybellid"
deleted
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
No great genius has ever existed without
Perhaps the regex search is performed on the rendered text as opposed to
the source text? Taking the spam comment on #2104 as an example, the
spammer appears to be using the `[ ]` or
`[[|]]` markup, therefore `http` does not appear in
the rendered text.
But on the other hand, the regex
On 03/12/2023 08:49, Michael Koch wrote:
Does anybody know why the last regex seach pattern in the list doesn't
work?
I thought it should match if any of the keywords is followed by "http"
in the same line, with any number of any characters before, between
and after the keywords.
Are you talking based on the source of the email message?
I don't have the messages as email. I see only the comments in the trac
timeline:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/timeline
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Hello,
野宮です．
In the Message;
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] trac spam
Message-ID :
Date & Time: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:57:40 +0100
[MK] == Michael Koch has written:
MN>> I haven't seen the original email so I don't know, but I think it
MN>> might be a character
I haven't seen the original email so I don't know, but I think it
might be a character code issue.
Example:
Comment 14 in ticket 2104 contains "Great" and "amazing" and "http" in
the same line.
But the regex filter didn't match.
Michael
___
Hello,
In the Message;
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] trac spam
Message-ID :
Date & Time: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 09:49:55 +0100
[MH] == Michael Koch has written:
MH> Am 03.12.2023 um 09:39 schrieb Michael Koch:
MH> > please delete:
MH> >
MH> > comment 14 in tic
Am 03.12.2023 um 09:39 schrieb Michael Koch:
please delete:
comment 14 in ticket 2104
comment 6 in ticket 2776
user "bunnybellid"
I have updated the regex search patterns.
Does anybody know why the last regex seach pattern in the list doesn't work?
I thought it should match if any of the
please delete:
comment 14 in ticket 2104
comment 6 in ticket 2776
user "bunnybellid"
I have updated the regex search patterns.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:06:10AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-10-27 19:53:08)
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Is it possible to make the "Bad Content" page invisible? It would be
> > > better
> > > if the spammer can't
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Please delete:
> Comment 14 in ticket 2104
> Comment 2 in ticket 5154
> User "ballid"
>
> The duplicated search patterns in regex filter did work as expected (-20
> points), but the spammer got +20 points from captcha.
>
> I've
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:03:38AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Please delete also user "bunnylid". He did not yet write anything, but he
> did register with the same IP adress as the other spammer, only a few
> minutes earlier.
done
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-10-27 19:53:08)
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Is it possible to make the "Bad Content" page invisible? It would be better
> > if the spammer can't see the filtering rules.
>
> everything is possible but its not a standard
Please delete also user "bunnylid". He did not yet write anything, but
he did register with the same IP adress as the other spammer, only a few
minutes earlier.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Please delete:
Comment 14 in ticket 2104
Comment 2 in ticket 5154
User "ballid"
The duplicated search patterns in regex filter did work as expected (-20
points), but the spammer got +20 points from captcha.
I've updated the search patterns.
Michael
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Is it possible to make the "Bad Content" page invisible? It would be better
> if the spammer can't see the filtering rules.
everything is possible but its not a standard feature of trac that
i know of.
you would have to change trac,
Is it possible to make the "Bad Content" page invisible? It would be
better if the spammer can't see the filtering rules.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 04:37:00PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> please delete:
> comment 12 in ticket 1920
> user ""willow"
done
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
No human being will ever know the Truth, for even if they happen to say it
by
please delete:
comment 12 in ticket 1920
user ""willow"
I have updated the regex filter so that it should match all combinations
of two keywords, in both orders.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:24:14PM +, Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel
wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 20, 2023, at 10:53 AM, Michael Koch
> > wrote:
> >
> >> should i add /pipermail/ffmpeg-trac to robots.txt ?
> > is there anyone who googles in these ffmpeg trac archives ?
> >
> > I don't.
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2023, at 10:53 AM, Michael Koch
> wrote:
>
>> should i add /pipermail/ffmpeg-trac to robots.txt ?
> is there anyone who googles in these ffmpeg trac archives ?
>
> I don't.
I'd imagine anyone wanting to search would search trac itself rather than the
mailing list archive. If
strings that are certain spam, you can just add that twice for double the
points lost
done.
should i add /pipermail/ffmpeg-trac to robots.txt ?
is there anyone who googles in these ffmpeg trac archives ?
I don't.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 09:05:07PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > IIRC each regex give -10 so multiple matches give more.
>
> So far, the search strings contain only combinations of keywords, for example
> "concretevictoria".
> False positives are almost impossible.
strings that are certain
IIRC each regex give -10 so multiple matches give more.
Let's assume we have a long keyword like "concretevictoria". Nobody uses
this keyword in a normal text. A false positive is almost impossible.
I could search for "concretevictoria", "concretevictori." and
"concretevictor.." and get
On 19 Oct 2023, at 21:05, Michael Koch wrote:
>> IIRC each regex give -10 so multiple matches give more.
>
> So far, the search strings contain only combinations of keywords, for example
> "concretevictoria".
> False positives are almost impossible.
>
> I could add shorter keywords, for
IIRC each regex give -10 so multiple matches give more.
So far, the search strings contain only combinations of keywords, for example
"concretevictoria".
False positives are almost impossible.
I could add shorter keywords, for example "concrete" and "victoria".
Then we would get multiple
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 07:49:10PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > You would have to read the trac source probably and maybe do local tests
> tracing through the code what happens
> but a non spammer posting spam
> setting up trac locally is easy, it comes with its own deamon you dont
> even
You would have to read the trac source probably and maybe do local tests
tracing through the code what happens
but a non spammer posting spam
setting up trac locally is easy, it comes with its own deamon you dont
even need a webserver
That sounds too complicated for me.
What about my other
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 07:28:33PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> please delete:
> comment 14 in ticket 2104
> comment 6 in ticket 2776
> user "bristleback"
done
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Democracy is the form of government in which you
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 07:05:28PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> > Iam not aware of any delay, did you see a delay ?
>
> I did change the search string (2nd from end of list) and 19 minutes later I
> made a test posting in ticket 2776.
> I have no idea why the pattern wasn't found.
You would
Iam not aware of any delay, did you see a delay ?
I did change the search string (2nd from end of list) and 19 minutes later I
made a test posting in ticket 2776.
I have no idea why the pattern wasn't found.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 04:21:44PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> When I edit the BadContent list, do the new search strings immediately
> become effective, or must I wait some time?
Iam not aware of any delay, did you see a delay ?
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
When I edit the BadContent list, do the new search strings immediately
become effective, or must I wait some time?
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit
I've just tested the regex filter with a posting in ticket 2776. This
test was not successful.
I thought that the second entry from the end of the list should have
matched:
(?i)regards.{0,5}http
In words: Switch to case insensitive, search for "regards" followed by 0
to 5 of any characters,
Please have a look at the Spam Filtering / Monitoring page.
One of the spammer's postings was rejected, because it contained a
blacklisted pattern in Regex filter and got -10 points.
But 20 seconds later the same posting was accepted, because the spammer
was successfully verified by Captcha and
please delete:
comment 14 in ticket 2104
comment 6 in ticket 2776
user "bristleback"
Thanks,
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
I just updated the dead link, also added the link to Wikipedia, added
some keywords for our favourite spammer, and added short descriptions
what (?i) and .? means.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:14 AM Michael Koch
wrote:
>
> Is it ok if I remove the dead link to Python syntax, and replace it by
> this link to Wikipedia?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression
>
A more accurate page would probably to just point to the correct
python regex docs, eg:
Is it ok if I remove the dead link to Python syntax, and replace it by
this link to Wikipedia?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:39 AM Michael Koch
wrote:
>
> (?i)customer.?support
> (?i)customer.?care
> (?i)customer.?service
>
> What's the meaning of (?i) and .?
> I can't find that in Python syntax description.
>
This is regular expression syntax, not python syntax. There are some
nice online
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:00:39AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> I'm not sure if I understood that right. If I add a keyword to the list on
> this page
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/BadContent
> then any posting which contains this keyword will get a negative score?
> And if the score exceeds a
(?i)customer.?support
(?i)customer.?care
(?i)customer.?service
What's the meaning of (?i) and .?
I can't find that in Python syntax description.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
I'm not sure if I understood that right. If I add a keyword to the list
on this page
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/BadContent
then any posting which contains this keyword will get a negative score?
And if the score exceeds a threshold, then the posting will be rejected?
Is this only for changes
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:52:42AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> The last username was "sharselune".
she has been terminated
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in
ancient
Hi
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:52:42AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> The last username was "sharselune".
> Can't we also delete the spam from the archive?
> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2023-September/067004.html
> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2023-September/067006.html
>
The last username was "sharselune".
Can't we also delete the spam from the archive?
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2023-September/067004.html
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2023-September/067006.html
http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2023-September/067058.html
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 05:28:29PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 4:33 PM Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 02:30:20PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:46 PM Michael Koch <
> > astroelectro...@t-online.de>
> > > wrote:
> >
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 4:33 PM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 02:30:20PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:46 PM Michael Koch <
> astroelectro...@t-online.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ticket / Comment
> > > 1920 / 12
> > >
> > Remove that nick once and
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 02:30:20PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:46 PM Michael Koch
> wrote:
>
> > Ticket / Comment
> > 1920 / 12
> >
> Remove that nick once and for all.
No user with the nick "that" has been found
sorry
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 01:46:45PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Ticket / Comment
> 1920 / 12
The ticket comment 12 on ticket #1920 has been deleted.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Rewriting code that is poorly written but fully understood is
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 1:46 PM Michael Koch
wrote:
> Ticket / Comment
> 1920 / 12
>
Remove that nick once and for all.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To
Ticket / Comment
1920 / 12
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 07:44:03AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Ticket / Comment
> 2104 / 14
> 2776 / 6
> 3720 / 9
The ticket comment 14 on ticket #2104 has been deleted.
The ticket comment 6 on ticket #2776 has been deleted.
The ticket comment 9 on ticket #3720 has been deleted.
[...]
--
Ticket / Comment
2104 / 14
2776 / 6
3720 / 9
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 07:03:33AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > I guess deleting users requires full admin rights, so i guess, just make a
> > list
> of users which are in need of a deletion and post that and i or less likely
> some other admin will disable/delete them.
>
> Please delete user
I guess deleting users requires full admin rights, so i guess, just make a list
of users which are in need of a deletion and post that and i or less likely
some other admin will disable/delete them.
Please delete user "selune" in ticket 2104
You and everyone else in the spam fighter group
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:11:56AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:20:58PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > I see the "Delete selected as Spam" button, but no "Remove registered user"
> > button.
>
> I guess deleting users requires full admin rights, so i guess, just
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:20:58PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> I see the "Delete selected as Spam" button, but no "Remove registered user"
> button.
I guess deleting users requires full admin rights, so i guess, just make a list
of users which are in need of a deletion and post that and i or
I see the "Delete selected as Spam" button, but no "Remove registered
user" button.
Michael
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 11:20:23AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> new spammer in ticket 2104
i added you to the spam fighters group
that gives you the following powers:
SPAM_CHECKREPORTS SPAM_MONITOR SPAM_REPORT SPAM_TRAIN SPAM_USER
TICKET_EDIT_COMMENT WIKI_ADMIN
permissions sadly are not
new spammer in ticket 2104
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 06:20:07AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> new spammer in ticket 2776
spammer killed and also everything else he did
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Does the universe only have a finite lifespan? No, its going to go on
new spammer in ticket 2776
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 02:39:54PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> please remove the spammers from tickets 1920, 2104, 2776, 3720, 4748 and
> 5154.
removed what i found, not sure had the feeling someone else was also already
deleting them
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint:
please remove the spammers from tickets 1920, 2104, 2776, 3720, 4748 and
5154.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 08:02:42AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> please have a look at ticket 2104
cleaned up
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing something just because
microsoft did it is even
please have a look at ticket 2104
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Am 24.04.23 um 22:23 schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
Hi all
thilo pointed me to some spam on trac today, investigating i found a spammer
with 4 accounts who spammed ~6 tickets
thanks to the last update the permission for the admin page to delete users
seems to got a new name which slightly slowed
Hi all
thilo pointed me to some spam on trac today, investigating i found a spammer
with 4 accounts who spammed ~6 tickets
thanks to the last update the permission for the admin page to delete users
seems to got a new name which slightly slowed me down.
I think i deleted all that spam.
If you
69 matches
Mail list logo
