If you want to turn on your SCSI device after your computer is already
booted, No problem. Just right click on MY
COMPUTER, left click on properties,select DEVICE Manager tab and left click
on REFRESH and then OK. This is for a windows machine. I don't know what you
need to do for an Apple
I dont think that will work, as many SCSI devices have to be seen by the
SCSI BIOS on boot up.
--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Using the Coolscan III for scanning negatives I sometimes notice scratches
after the scan. Sometimes when I scan negatives with 4 pictures, the next to
the last one gets scratched in longitudinal direction. I thought that these
scratches are caused by extremely bent negatives. Unfortunately the
Anyone else find there Coolscan IV noisey?
--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
Arthur Entlich wrote
As some may know, almost all viewfinders, except one Contax and a couple
of older Nikons (F2, I think) and maybe one other camera which give 100%
view of what ends up on the film) The vast majority of camera view
finders show only
In 01c0ecc2$a1908ef0$6401a8c0@jamesg, James Grove wrote:
I dont think that will work, as many SCSI devices have to be seen by the
SCSI BIOS on boot up.
It certainly does *not* work on my Windows 98 machine - the SCSI devices
all have to be on at boot-up.
Brian Rumary, England
Brian wrote:
Eastman did _not_ evade Talbot's patents, as they had expired by the time
he got into the photo business. At that time British patents lasted 16 years
and I believe that Talbot invented his Calotype paper negative process about
1849.
1849 sounds about right to me (possibly
You appear to have deduced the cause of the scratches that appear
using the feeder. The film strip holder is much better in every
aspect except convenience:)) The feeder also doesn't get the film
flat enough! In other words, it's 'one-hour' quality, don't use it
unless you're just doing quick
Moreno Polloni wrote:
As some may know, almost all viewfinders, except one Contax and a couple
of older Nikons (F2, I think) and maybe one other camera which give 100%
view of what ends up on the film) The vast majority of camera view
finders show only 92-96% of the image which is recorded
That's incredible. I thought only HP was asleep at the switch
on this, with their HP Photosmart and S-20, both of which will destroy
your sixth frame if you use a full 6 frame film strip. HP finally made
the software limit intake to 4 or 5 neg strips to resolve the problem.
Art
Walter
Any find there CoolScan IV a bit noisey?
--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
Hot Swappable means only one thing: It can be plugged/un-plugged
while the computer (and the cable connection) is in operation and
active. Firewire (1394) and USB have that property. SCSI does not,
although you can optain special connectors that allow
hot-swappability at those connections,
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
At 23:40 02-06-01 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
As some may know, almost all viewfinders, except one Contax and a
couple of older Nikons (F2, I think) and maybe one other camera which
give 100% view of what ends up on the film) The vast
That works on mine.
Geoff
- Original Message -
From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ? ( SCSI vs USB )
I dont think that will work, as many SCSI devices have to be seen by
Hi, Jerry--
You wrote:
The Acer appears to be very large and the slide holder can be difficult to
load with plastic springs that are fragile.
That is a very fixable problem, accomplished with an X-Acto tool or even a
sturdy pocket-knife. My post on that should be available in the archives, or
I
24.1 x 36.0 mm as I measured it. Extra 0,5 mm will be useful - it is
rather
difficult to position the film precisely
From the LS4000 pdf file:
Scanning area (max.) 25.1 x 38mm (3,946 x 5,959 pixels)
Effective area SA-21: 23.3 x 36.0mm (3,654 x 5,646)
(size/pixels) MA-20(S): 25.1 x 36.8mm*
In 382693518.991527991110.JavaMail.root@web595-ec, Lynn Allen wrote:
It seems to me that George Eastman circumvented Talbot's and other patents
very successfully vis-a-vis sensitized-paper and celuloid negatives--and
then proceded to take over or eliminate almost every other film and
In a message dated 6/3/2001 10:55:46 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unlike Nikons, doesn't this scanner insist the IR channel scan
separately from the RGB scan ... ie, a 2nd pass. I thought the
original post was stating, if he wanted 16x RGB passes, it also
scanned the IR 16x. There
Walter Nowotny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scanning unit. The turn round is made by some plastics parts which
probably
cause the scratches when the negatives are bent too much. I was satisfied
with that explanation and tried to smooth down the negatives before
scanning. However, processing the
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Dave King wrote:
You appear to have deduced the cause of the scratches that appear
using the feeder. The film strip holder is much better in every
aspect except convenience:)) The feeder also doesn't get the film
flat enough! In other words, it's 'one-hour' quality,
James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think that will work, as many SCSI devices have to be seen by the
SCSI BIOS on boot up.
It works with my LS30 and the Scanjet IIIc. Scanners shouldn't be a
problem. The most likely devices that would need to be seen at SCSI BIOS
load would be hard
I dont think that will work, as many SCSI devices have to be seen by the
SCSI BIOS on boot up.
Have you tried it? I've been using that method for years. It works about 95%
of the time.
I haven't noticed such scratches myself, but the solution of course is to
use the 6-frame negative strip holder rather than the automatic film feeder.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Walter Nowotny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:48 AM
Subject:
--- You wrote:
Argus had almost ruled the roost for reasonably-priced 35mm with its
C-Series bricks (Kodak did have the very good Retina, which was smaller,
lighter...and German-made; and the Ektra-- these were in very short supply
and cost $300 in the 1940's--the eauivalent of $3000 or more in
Well it works without any problem for now one year on my W2k machine with
sp2 installed...
Jean-Pierre
- Original Message -
From: B.Rumary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ? ( SCSI vs USB )
Art wrote:
Ah, some more make the list. OK, I obviously was too severe in my comment
;-)
Yes, Art sometimes does that, but never without a bit of wit. :)
Let's just say that most mid priced SLR cameras, are not likely to come
with 100% viewfinders, and that more likely, cameras which do
For sake of interest, Popular Photo rated their F3 test camera at 98.8%
horizontally by 99.2% vertically. I guess that's about as close to 100%
as one can expect.
One thing that no one seems to take into consideration is the focal length
of the lens used. Take some photos on the same roll of
Given the propensity of scanners to make large files, eg, 35mm at 2700
with VueScan at 64 bits 50 meg *each*. OTOH I've seen pre orders being
taken for 24x writers. thought this might be of interest here.
at
http://www.us.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=70002669
TDK VeloCD 12x/10x/32x CD-RW
This is strange, because mine works just fine without the BIOS/ Boot or
fiddling around. What year-model machines are you guys usning? It shouldn't
make any difference, given Win98, but it would look like it does. Mine's a
'99 Dell with a very few updates, and spots any device as soon as the
I tried this today and it worked for me - I'm running Windows 98SE
Maris
- Original Message -
From: B.Rumary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ? ( SCSI vs USB )
| In
It has always worked for me. I believe that the device manager refresh I
suggested accomplishes what you suggest just as if the SCSI device was on at
Windows Boot up. This is a proceedure that I nearly always use with my SS
4000. It has never failed. Try it. Regards, Ron
- Original Message
It works on my wife's Win 98 SE machine and her SCSI flat bed. Regards, Ron
- Original Message -
From: B.Rumary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: which scanner for slides ? ( SCSI vs USB )
In
Richard wrote:
What was that monster Kodak 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 rangefinder (220 film) that they
sold during the war and possibly before? Beautifully built in the US,
uncoatedoptics that were quite good, it looked like a kid's toy on steriods.
Oooh, that's a toughie. The Medalist was a 620, but it
Uhm, I think that's that word that Rob and I were trying to think of and
couldn't. :-) With a wide-angle lens, your image will tend to spread out a
little behind the shutter, rather than being cut off by it. I wouldn't have
thought it was a particularly measurable distance, but on 4-square it
Is it that big a difference? We're speaking of the light angle
differences which can allow for an exposed area due to the gap between
the internal frame mask within the camera and the film plane... so,
that's based upon how far the guide tracks stand out from the frame
surface. On the Nikon
I don't mean to question your authority on this, since I don't own a
2740 and you probably have worked with one, however, I am trying to
understand the mechanism of this situation.
I understand that dICE works by doing a comparison of the infrared image
and the visible image and does some
36 matches
Mail list logo
