Hi!
I think that both Vuescan and Digital ICE don't work very well with
Kodachrome slides, which has also been stated many times. As far as I know
Digital ICE softens the image, while Vuescan does not. So I'd suggest that
applying som additional filter (dust and scratches) in Photoshop may help.
I tried to update my LS40 and it said: this machine doesn´t need the
update
cheers bernhard
- Original Message -
From: Jan Copier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone knows if I need the update of Firmware Nikon Coolscan IV version
1.1, available on this site?
Thanks Ed, valuable info indeed.
It's really worthwhile info to know that it will work with your software as
previous versions did.
Now, what about the quality ? Did you hear any opinions about his scanning
capabilities ?
Regards,
Alex Z
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 12/29/2001 10:36:13 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's really worthwhile info to know that it will work with your software as
previous versions did.
Now, what about the quality ? Did you hear any opinions about his scanning
capabilities ?
It's not yet working with
If you are on a budget, and willing to experiment, and suffer the quality
consequenses, you can photograph your screen.
I have recently seen a slide show where scanned slides were digitally
manipulated, then photographed from screen. I don't know what the screen
resolution was.
When only
** Reply to note from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 28 Dec 2001
15:45:32 -0500
Will the Sprintscan 4000 plus offer any significant features over and
above the current Sprintscan 4000? Will it replace the current 4000?
I am also trying to buy a Sprintscan 4000 here in the UK. The Polaroid rep
here
That key, E068, yields nothing as of yesterday. The people at that number
were very nice, but couldn't help.
But I did get on to Polaroid Tech Support at the phone number listed on their
web site. They connected me to an order-taker, who accepted my order for a
film strip holder for the
Ed Hamrick wrote:
It's basically the same scanner as the Scan Dual II, except
it adds an infrared channel and a Firewire interface (it also
has a USB interface like the Scan Dual II).
and subsequently wrote (about its capabilities):
It's not yet working with VueScan and I don't have one
Ed Hamrick wrote:
It's basically the same scanner as the Scan Dual II, except
it adds an infrared channel and a Firewire interface (it also
has a USB interface like the Scan Dual II).
and subsequently wrote (about its capabilities):
It's not yet working with VueScan and I don't have one
On 12/27/01 3:28 PM, William Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Grain Surgery for a couple of months now. There is a
noticeable and pleasing effect on image quality. I now use it on all images.
Found this software on the web the other day and gave it a try.
Tried the demo
Hi All:
Just thought I'd put in my recommendation of the Nikon Coolscan IV,
after using one at a client's home. I found the image data excellent
and just by setting highlight and shadow points in the curves
section(after entering RGB15 shad and RGB245 highlight in the
options/advanced color
Is the USB on the SS4000+ USB 2.0 or 1.1?
Have you compared any scans from the Plus with the SS120? Do you know the
rated Dynamic Range of the Plus? I'm hoping it's 3.9 like the SS120, since
both are 14-bit systems. That would mean an extra 1-2/3 stops of range over
the 4000, which is
There is a big difference between screen resolution of 1200x 800 and having a
4000x2700
pixel slide from a 4k film printer (or 8200x5500 pixels off an 8k one). The earlier
Film
printers were not much with there small tubes (The current Polaroids have 7 tubes)
Compared to the screen the film
Ed
Is there a reason that Vuescan is not twain driven so it can be used out of Photoshop
etc.?
Rob
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or
body
The Sprintscan plus is not yet on the market, but will be the
replacement for the SS4000. It will probably cost nearly twice as much
as current pricing on the SS4000. It has somewhat higher bit depth, and
a firewire or USB connection versus SCSI.
Art
Thomas B. Maugham wrote:
I've seen
Thomas B. Maugham wrote:
Will the Sprintscan 4000 plus offer any significant features over and
above
the current Sprintscan 4000? Will it replace the current 4000?
Tom
No, Yes.
Art
If you can find a SS4000 at a good price you might wish to buy it.
David Hemingway has stated that the main differences are bit depth
increase from 12 to 14. Interface changed from SCSI II to USB and Firewire.
Art
Charles Stirling wrote:
** Reply to note from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 28 Dec
17 matches
Mail list logo