[filmscanners] Re: PC memory type for filmscanning (OT - slightly)

2001-12-31 Thread Tom Scales
It is more expensive, but not that much more. I bought 512mb of RDRAM for $160. Tom - Is RDRAM a better choice for systems used for scanning and processing large 2d image files? The PC mags report recently (maybe Nov-Dec) that RDRAM is only a few percent faster than DDR. It's no

[filmscanners] RE: SS4000

2001-12-31 Thread Alex Zabrovsky
Well, I don't have an old stuff to scan, I actually started to shoot slides intensively about two years ago and wouldn't mind too much for the IR GEM and restoration abilities (however dust/scratches cleaning might be appealing, would the SS4000 be such great deal). Regards, Alex Z

[filmscanners] Re: New Firmware version for Nikon LS40

2001-12-31 Thread Jan Copier
Peter, Mine says Nikon Coolscan IV ED 1.05 @ USB Is this the Firmware version? Jan - Original Message - From: Peter Marquis-Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 4:41 AM Subject: [filmscanners] Re: New Firmware version for Nikon LS40 Jan

[filmscanners] Re: Minolta vs Nikon MF Question

2001-12-31 Thread David Harris
I too am used to older Nikon scanners and combining multiple scans at different exposures. I have been using the Minolta for about a month, and have not as yet found an image which is beyond the usable dynamic range of the scanner in a single scan. My images are mostly Velvia, Astia and Pan-F so

[filmscanners] Re: Editing application

2001-12-31 Thread Arthur Entlich
Hi Alex, Do you have any darkroom experience? The reason I ask is that Photoshop is designed around photo-darkroom jargon, with masks and filters and the like, and it might therefore be more comfortable for that reason. Since I don't use the other packages I can't comment how they are designed

[filmscanners] Re: New Firmware version for Nikon LS40

2001-12-31 Thread Peter Marquis-Kyle
Jan Looks like you have version 1.05. If I were you I would update to version 1.1. Peter Marquis-Kyle Peter, Mine says Nikon Coolscan IV ED 1.05 @ USB Is this the Firmware version? Jan Unsubscribe

[filmscanners] Re: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000

2001-12-31 Thread Lloyd O'Daniel
I know. I've had my SS4000 for 2 years and am happy. But (significant) dynamic range improvement is probably the only reason I would upgrade short of a scanner meltdown. I'm hoping/assuming that Polaroid is using the same conservative methodology in rating the 120 and the Plus, ergo a real

[filmscanners] Warning and huge disappointment: Minolta Scan Elite II shadow banding

2001-12-31 Thread Ralf Schmode
Hi everybody, after a week of relaxation in Denmark I was looking forward to receiving my brand new Minolta Scan Elite II today. It installed with no problem, and the scans looked good - at first sight. Unfortunately, one of the pics had what I thought was a huge horizontzal scratch. Okay, this

[filmscanners] SS4000 on XP

2001-12-31 Thread Paul Chefurka
I've got my SS4000 installed and running under XP. The problem I'm having is that on startup the New Hardware Wizard keeps detecting it as new hardware and asking me to install drivers for it. If I just cancel the Wizard everything works fine, but it's a PITA to have to do that every time I

[filmscanners] Re: Warning and huge disappointment: Minolta Scan Elite II sha...

2001-12-31 Thread
In a message dated 12/31/2001 9:24:52 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It installed with no problem, and the scans looked good - at first sight. Unfortunately, one of the pics had what I thought was a huge horizontzal scratch. It looks like this is either dust in the calibration light

[filmscanners] RE: Warning and huge disappointment: Minolta Scan Elite II shadow banding

2001-12-31 Thread Alex Zabrovsky
Thanks Ralf, very valuable contribution. I was considering one as an option to SS4000, however I see there is still no alternative to excellent SS4000. Regards, Alex Z -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ralf Schmode Sent: Monday, December

[filmscanners] Re: Warning and huge disappointment: Minolta Scan Elite II shadowbanding

2001-12-31 Thread Ralf Schmode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: [Minolta Scan Elite II} It looks like this is either dust in the calibration light path, or more likely is a bit of dirt on the glass over the CCD. It could also be a small flaw in the CCD. Hi, Ed, I'd be happy if that was true. But, if you look closely, there

[filmscanners] RE: OTish : thumbnail CD cover creators?

2001-12-31 Thread Cliff Ober
Compupic from Photodex ( http://www.photodex.com/products/compupic/index.html ) can do what you'd like with it's index function - but only for 8bit/color TIFF's (and other formats). It's a GREAT program, but it can't handle 16bit TIFF files. The Photodex folks have yet to be convinced that people

[filmscanners] Interesting result of RGB separation (was: Warning and hugedisappointment...)

2001-12-31 Thread Ralf Schmode
Hi again, looks as if my brand new Scan Elite II has got at least three problems rather than one: Please look at http://schmode.net/banding_channels.jpg which shows that there are at least two faulty areas on the CCD (middle and bottom) *plus* a periodic banding pattern contributed by the red

[filmscanners] VueScan update wish - my last idea for the year 2001

2001-12-31 Thread Bernie Ess
What I´d like to see is a place on the GUI where I can permanently see *and correct* the name of the file, or the one being created on the next scan. Could be in the title blue bar next to the Version number, or somewhere else - I never know what file I am at... A happy new year to everyone...

[filmscanners] VueScan 7.3.10 Available

2001-12-31 Thread
I just released VueScan 7.3.10 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux. It can be downloaded from: http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html What's new in version 7.3.10 * Improved color balance algorithm * Fixed problem with some HP scanners on Windows * Fixed problem with some UMAX scanners and

[filmscanners] OT: Polaroid Bonuses

2001-12-31 Thread Jack Jansen
Executives' Bonuses Stir Anger as Polaroid Sinks By JUSTIN POPE ASSOCIATED PRESS December 31, 2001 BOSTON -- In 1996, when Gary DiCamillo joined Polaroid Corp. as chief executive, the company had 10,000 employees and its stock was trading at more than $40 a share. Five years later, Polaroid is

[filmscanners] Re: OTish : thumbnail CD cover creators?

2001-12-31 Thread
Ned Nurk wrote: Hi Guys, hope you had a good xmas and are going to have a few beers tonight! I am about to archive a lot of large raw scans to CD and I was just wondering if there is any CD cover creation program that can put thumbnails filenames up there automatically. (at the moment it

[filmscanners] RE: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas B. Maugham
The rebate has been extended to January 31, 2002. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jack Jansen Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 David, The rebate offer was

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.3.10 Available

2001-12-31 Thread Paul Chefurka
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:01:15 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just released VueScan 7.3.10 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux. It can be downloaded from: http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html Th version I downloaded comes up identified as 7.3.9 on the top bar, even though the link on the Web

[filmscanners] SS4000 dust streaks

2001-12-31 Thread Pat Cullinan, jr.
Dear folks, My scans have recently been having linear streaks in the direction of the scan. The problem is more or less intermittent, with the preponderance of the behavior being in favor of the streaks. There is no evidence of streaking on the original materials, and in any event, the

[filmscanners] Re: SS4000 on XP

2001-12-31 Thread Op's
Have you tried reinstallation when the wizard comes up? This may place the files in there correct place and hence cancel the wizard next boot. Rob Paul Chefurka wrote: I've got my SS4000 installed and running under XP. The problem I'm having is that on startup the New Hardware Wizard

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.3.10 Available

2001-12-31 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
You should clear your browser's cache and try again - 7.3.10 showed up fine for me. Maris - Original Message - From: Paul Chefurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:13 PM Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.3.10 Available On Mon, 31 Dec 2001

[filmscanners] Neat Image noise/grain removal prog, was'Anyone Have Exp WithGrainSurgery..'

2001-12-31 Thread Mark T.
Maris - thanks very much for the link. This software is a well kept secret (I hadn't stumbled over it despite frequent searches on this topic), but it looks very promising indeed. Even after a little experimentation it gives much better results than any other method I've tried, and it is less

[filmscanners] Re: Neat Image noise/grain removal prog, was'Anyone Have Exp WithGrainSurgery..'

2001-12-31 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
It is very slow *period* - I have a 700MHz Pentium with 576MB RAM Maris - Original Message - From: Mark T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 4:15 PM Subject: [filmscanners] Neat Image noise/grain removal prog, was'Anyone Have Exp

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.3.10 Available

2001-12-31 Thread Paul Chefurka
I did clear the cache. The browser shows 7.3.10 on Ed's page, just as it should. However, when the program itself executes, its self-identification on the top border of the Vuescan window is 7.3.9. Paul On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 15:51:10 -0600, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You