job on that image that you showed. I now have hope.
Thanks,
Jerry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 00:00:02 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Sat 18 Oct, 2003
www.halftone.co.uk/10d
.
Jerry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:03 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Tue 14 Oct, 2003
o o o
The BW CN films, why use them? If you want BW images, shoot with color
neg. That way you
.
Tony you are the best and I support you whatever you do.
Jerry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
on the honor system. I know
this is not for most the posters to this group. But maybe you know someone
who wants to get started.
Please reply directly if you are interested or know someone who is as I get
the digest and sometimes miss things.
Jerry
Which version of Nikonscan? The CM was very broken in earlier versions...
Hi Tony,
It is version 3.1.2 of NikonScan.
Jerry
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
Didier,
I usually shoot both Portra NC 160 and VC 160, and have great results with
wet darkroom printing.
Does Portra VC 160 also scan well?
---
Jerry M. Pine
San Jose, CA
Photographs are made, not taken.
- Original Message -
From: DRP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25
negatives I still get 3 to 30 dustspots on every scan. Perhaps our
living-room is too dust for filmscanning and the scanwit has acquired a fair
amount of dust internally.
BTW. Its not 2 and 2 and 4 pixels, but a lot more with my scanner.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Entlich
, especially the spots, so you will have work to do.
Jerry
BTW. The 2740S may have a completely different type of CCD with much better
quality. My suggestion however is to test whatever scanner you buy with a
high-contrast negative film with a shot of large highlights and with a high
contrast slide
programs. Paint Shop Pro looks good, but doesn't handle 16-bit data. What
about Ulead PhotoImpact, Corel Photo-Paint, Micrographix Picture
Publisher,
etc. ?
[Oostrom, Jerry] I use Picture Window Pro which has windows color
management support (so you need Windows 98SE or 'higher'), does
-Original Message-
From: David Gordon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:21 PM
To: Filmscanners
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Good neg stck on Scanwit
Oostrom, Jerry [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Mon, 13 Aug
2001 15:48:10 +0200
Kodak Supra negative
tranny films lately and they mentioned which films were contrasty and which
were less contrasty. This will ensure that the Scanwit will be able to scan
the shadows. Also tranny film will scan very smoothly compared to the grainy
appearance of negative film.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From
Paintshop Pro
7.02
Picture Window Pro is another cheap photo editing program which you might
consider in addition to PSP because it *does* support 16 bit editing.
http://www.dl-c.com/
[Oostrom, Jerry] PWP uses the windows color management system,
which is probably not as good
Fiction
[Oostrom, Jerry] Why? ... Who, you or he?
Jerry Oostrom
Acer Scanwit user.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Canoscan
Thanks for your extensive research Frank!
BTW. I received your mail twice.
Could I ask you to try your photoshop correcting example with the BMW image
if it is not too much trouble?
Thanks Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Frank Nichols [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06
-Original Message-
From: Alan Tyson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Stains and Grains (was Yellow Stain)
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
So if it's only occasionally a problem, don't worry. You
Sorry, I thought I had replied to him directly.
8-7
-Original Message-
From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Stains and Grains (was Yellow Stain)
Thanks for your extensive
Sorry Nikon, it was the the LS with the IV that had normal contrast and the
one with the 4000 that had high contrast. It was my memory that had no
contrast.
-Original Message-
From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:53 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED
,
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Henk de Jong [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: ScanWit Yellow stain
Jerry, I'd suggest you find another photographer with another scanner
(this
List might help
if it contains articles I am especially interested in.
Not that PP UK contains better tests, jut better photos printed on more
expensive paper, more tips and articles that don't spread over 20 pages
(continued here... continued there...).
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Robert Meier
/toWebFlatbedquart.jpg 132k
(also PWP'd and saved at 100% jpg quality)
So is it user error, is it scanner error (bad lamp / bad CCD) or is it me
pushing the envelopes of what a decent scanner can do?
Thank you all for your interest, I've used you comments to make my point at
Acer NL,
Jerry
BTW. All good
or rather 2,3?
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
But I've just read a review od the 4000ED in German magazine digit
ftp://ftp.lasersoft.com.pl/SFPrasa2001/Digit_3-2001.pdf which says, that
the
true Dmax of this scanner is 2,3! It was even worse than with Coolscan
LS-2000 which had 2,6. What't
: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan + flat colors (that disappear with
Mika
Jerry,
I think that the majority of any perceived acrimony that occurred in
these recent exchanges of ideas, is due to linguistic differences, as it
can
and on dark colored parts of a positive. Its ruining the wedding shots we
have taken from our family.
Thank you for your interest,
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
I'll try your solution with the blank frame.
I once tried to insert a piece of blank frame into the calibration hole and
it made the whole scan stripy!
Thanks,
Jerry.
BTW. I Bcc'd Mr. Honda Lo, so that's why I included all of your mail.
-Original Message-
From: Mark T. [SMTP
acts or more importantly
intentions etc. in public, even if they are true. (this is how I try to make
my mail less of a personal accusation is it working? 8-)
Saint Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Risedal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 5:34 PM
.
Photography is my hobby and I have slides going back many years.
I also take slides when I travel.
What are your suggestions for a scanner to meet my needs?
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, May 29, 2001 3:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans
Oostrom, Jerry wrote:
BTW. Lately I had sent in my scanner for service, and when I received it
back (problem not solved, at best only marginal improvements!) I
received
to start at $800.
Recently, I have seen messages about the Canon FS2710 and the
Acer is also in this price range.
Photography is my hobby and I have slides going back many years.
I also take slides when I travel.
What are your suggestions for a scanner to meet my needs?
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yesterday!
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
Jerry, is the 675 ppi scan on the Acer Scanwit 2740S REALLY done in under
10
seconds?
[Oostrom, Jerry] I don't know, I don't have one (I have a 2720S). If you
have the dust-removal enabled it will perhaps take somewhat more(!) than
double the time of a normal scan
Mike,
The 2000P Color Cartridge is also 5 color, but uses a pigment based ink,
while the 1270 uses a dye based ink.
---
Jerry M. Pine
Photographs are made, not taken.
- Original Message -
From: Mystic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:19 PM
I already asked this question to Ed and later to this list, all some time
ago. Ed replied that his algorithms were of course already doing such a
thing. Then I asked, where can you set the threshold on black (slides) or
white (negs) for what is considered to be dust and waited... (no answer to
doesn't meet functionality after
minimal usage?
To their everlasting credit, Acer *does* in fact replace, rather than
repair, defective Scanwits with new ones. At least in the US, as I know
firsthand.
[Oostrom, Jerry] I have my Acer scanner sent in for service, but
here in Holland
Beautiful reply with masterful selection of original text serves to prove
your and my point!
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Noise correction
to have them
here.
Jerry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canoscan 4000
The one thing to be cautious of is that it looks like it makes
two passes over
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s20
Hi Jerry,
If these spots are in an area that can be isolated, and they are
different enough from the rest of the area, you can do a few different
to damage the negs (very slight scratches), regardless of how
careful I am.
Jerry
BTW
Recently I have come up with a problem in several dias that if it would be
cured by ICE would certainly put the 2740s high on my list: black spots all
over the dia like filth-cristals. It was a Fuji Provia 100F film
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer Scanwit 2720s vs 2740s vs HP s20
Oostrom, Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ICE would remove these spots, which
does it take to change a light bulb???
Answer: 578.
1 to change the light bulb and post to the list that the light bulb has
been changed.
[Oostrom, Jerry] []
27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different light bulbs.
44 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly
. This may be especially useful after aging of the scanner.
Thank you in advance for your thoughts and time,
Jerry Oostrom
For the interested ones a part of the mail discussion with Ed and an example
(if the list lets me send it) of a negative scan out of many scans in which
the error is shown: yellow
) preview.
I hope I made myself clear, it is hard to tell what I mean without showing
it.
Of course: I do not have the newest Vuescan version, but I know it is in the
6.7.x range.
Jerry.
-Original Message-
From: Ezio [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 1:36 AM
=547,356,672 bits is 25,356,672 too
many. Luckily I was pointed to my error very soon.
-Original Message-
From: Oostrom, Jerry
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:57 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan 6.7.5 Available
To hopelessly continue that story:
1kb
-Original Message-
From: John D. Horton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000VuescanGrafics Program
- Original Message -
From: "Oostrom, Jerry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the perpendicular dimension? I've also been puzzled by
a similar claim on Epson's website. It gives a maximum print resolution
for the Epson 1270 photo quality printer of 1440x720 dpi
-Paul Patton
[Oostrom, Jerry] With all such measures I always assume that the
smaller number is the real
t accounts for charge bleeding
and a number of other issues. The result has none of the gross errors
that
Vuescan currently shows and works far better.
[Oostrom, Jerry] phasers locked, fire
Byron,
"smart programmers" used in comparison to Ed, "gross errors", "far better&q
ng the data. Do you know how PW works??
[Oostrom, Jerry] With the Pro version that facilitates CM:
* You can specify a scanner profile for TWAIN input,
* you can specify an assumed profile for input of a file without
profile,
* you can specify your working space,
*
athan Sachs" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Save Address - Block Sender
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
"Jerry Fiona Oostrom" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Save Address
Subject:
RE: A new problem with Picture Window 3.0
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:31:
Just a question:
how do you remove an embedded color space from your large tiff file?
I have a color profiling capable software package, but it didn't allow me to
profile convert to color profile 'none'. It seemed it just didn't do any
conversion if you selected none. Without the conversion I
, I want to shoot them
myself, but you have inspired me (and my wife if I
show her you pictures). Your 'less is really more')
Jerry Oostrom
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Julie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:54 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE
Duh!
-Original Message-
From: shAf [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 6:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Fw: Color Profiles for Scanners
[Oostrom, Jerry] [znibh..]
Not much of a point really. I'm sure many readers
in ProPhotoRGB but in a smaller gamut color
space or
* should have archived the 16-bit files instead (I am reluctant to do
this, I have a little crowded home)
Does anyone care to say something about the pros and cons of the three
approaches?
Thank you in advance,
even for reading this far,
Jerry
Ed Hamrick
[Oostrom, Jerry] A ha, so Vuescan cleaning still uses the infrared
channel. Perhaps you remember from the thousands of mails received this year
that some person (I) once sent you a request for a cleaning algorithm that
probably does not exist yet. I thought this up myself, but perhaps a lot of
of the pixels in the previous larger
image for each pixel in the new image?
It more or less explains why I have some grainy images that retain a lot of
their graininess when downsampled. But why is downsampling often called
better than downsizing?
Thank you all in advance,
Jerry
-Original
, the following generally
hold true;
[Oostrom, Jerry] [snip: look into archives to find this long mail]
to dark
parts in the other scans).
http://home.wish.net/~jerfi/prisonandme.jpg
Thanks in advance for your time and insight.
Jerry Oostrom
http://home.wanadoo.nl/joostrom
-Original Message-
From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 7:54 AM
bandwidth by sending this
reply to the filmscanner list i.s.o. you. I do this because I also like to
signal, just like many others have done, that I don't like to have so many
off-topic threads.
Have a nice weekend,
Jerry
BTW.
All my filmscanner mail is redirected to one folder. I think one
, while possible registering as an
overall purple cast when scanned with a color setting.
[Oostrom, Jerry] This is why I wondered whether the outcome of the
b/w scan with color setting should be color casted or not. I.e. why did I
get darkbrown and white scans, that after monitor profiling
Sorry, the scans will have to come later (begin of next week), something
came in between...
-Original Message-
From: Oostrom, Jerry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 8:19 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Profiling, Ilford XP2
some 2700 dpi scans (2550x3720) on a CD into
Boots the Chemists and had prints made. Their system feeds the
image files straight into the mini-lab.
The results from negs or slides are superb,
That's great to hear.
Someone with some positive feedback for a change!
[Oostrom, Jerry] I am
grain # softer grain
If the scans should look black and white the generic color negative setting
is i.m.o. preferable to the black and white Ilford XP2 setting of vuescan.
Now I just need to test Miraphoto for my scanwit with these settings.
Thanks in advance.
Jerry Oostrom
are in BruceRGB even though the profile is not embedded.
Have a nice weekend,
Jerry
http://home.wanadoo.nl/joostrom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Vuescanwit tip
Mine
60 matches
Mail list logo
