Very good work! What camera and scanner do you use?
I'm still with film and scanner as well, though I did pick up a Pentax Optio
555 for carry-around convenience.
Maris V. Lidaka Sr.
Henk de Jong wrote:
I am still using slide film and my scanner.
I am not yet ready for a digital camera
I think any Epson flatbed would be fine - I have the old Epson Perfection
1200, which scans at 1200ppi maximum, and IMHO it provides excellent
results. I've scanned BW and color photos, magazine and book images, and
just the other day a notebook computer RAM chip.
I did spring for SilverFast SE
I second that emotion - I don't consider myself old at 55, nor a fogie, but
thank you - I just picked up a PS digital for current use, but for fine art
and long term, I'm still using film.
Maris
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
And thanks (again) for keeping
this list
going -- the dwindling crew of
It's not moire, is it? What is he scanning?
Have him try a different scanning program - free trial of Vuescan. He can
perhaps narrow it down to a hardware vs. a software problem.
http://www.hamrick.com/
Maris
Brad Davis wrote:
Hi,
My electrician discovered that I know a little about
I would suggest you try Vuescan out - the demo is free but will have a
watermark on it. Essentially, it's preview is not all that accurate, but it
will capture all of the detail in the highlights and shadows and you can
work on the image from there in your preferred image-adjusting software.
Try adjusting the black and white point settings on the Color tab - the
detail in the shadow should show up better and your image adjustment
software will do the rest.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Elvis Hoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002
For slides there is no real need to lock film base color. In fact, Ed
Hamrick suggests the image setting for scanning slides.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Vincent Cleij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:57 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Film
Vuescan will get all the data that might still be available - from there
you'll have to deal with your preferred graphics program.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Denise Kissinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: [filmscanners]
I am and have been entirely satisfied with mine, and I primarily use Vuescan
with it. I paid $500 for a refurb before the new batch came out, so Major
Andras's suggestion of $300 tops sounds about right.
I have not had problems with the film strip feeder, but then I've scanned no
more than
Many of my films are old and scratched through poor processing labs, so I
have found Digital Ice (and Vuescan's IR-channel dust scratch removal)
invaluable.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject:
IM HARD OF HEARING - COULD YOU SPEAK A LITTLE LOUDER?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for
Fri 27 Sep, 2002
HELLO ALL,
I AM ABOUT TO
I tried it. Leaving the Resample box checked does result in no change the
ppi Resolution.
Unchecking the Resample box does result in a change in Resolution.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 7:03 PM
Brian said the file size was reduced, so there was apparently resampliing
(downsampling). Your hypothetical of entering 11 inches in the new
dimension, with the resampling box checked or unchecked, would not result in
PS computing 11 inches x 4000 ppi. PS would reduce the ppi proportionately
in
Yes it will be downsampled.
To downsample by 2, one method would be to change the dimensions of the
image to what you want, but UNCHECK Resample Image Click OK. This will
change the resolution but will not be downsampled yet.
Then Image - Image Size - change the resolution to 1/2 of the
Ed has released Vuescan 7.5.31
What's new in version 7.5.31
Added support for right mouse click on neutral color (control-click on Mac)
Added support for right mouse double-click to reset to White balance
Added display of pixel rgb value when mouse over image
Modified Filter|Infrared defects to
Good point - you are correct.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:33 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: JPG sharpening [was: Color spaces for different
purposes]
Maris writes:
True enough, but if the
material, for example a magazine or a photographic book
- stock photography (image bank)
- inkjet
and Maris V. Lidaka Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested:
I also would suggest Adobe RGB. I would not sharpen the images yet -
sharpen when you are ready to print on inkjet or to send to the
publisher, as your
Initial sharpening is what Bruce Frasier recommends:
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/12189.html
As to the effectiveness of sharpening on the smaller image - you have fewer
pixels to work with, so the same sharpening radius will be much more
visible.
Maris
- Original Message -
It's not that unusual, though I don't recall why, and LZW compression will
not reduce file size nearly as much as JPG
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 4:32 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Archiving and when to sharpen
Probably the artifacts created in the compression process. It would
probably be better to convert to JPG first and then sharpen.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Color
Sorry - I hadn't read this post when I sent the previous message.
Perhaps you are over-sharpening? Also, are you sharpening just the
Lightness channel or also the color channels?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June
Yes - definitely TIFF for printing, but sharpen after you resize.
I'm not familiar with Vuescan's for print output setting, since I output
to PS anyway.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 11:55 AM
Subject:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka
Sr.
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Color spaces for different purposes
I would convert and sharpen before compressing. It may or
may not help -
I'm
True enough, but if the image requires sharpening? JPG is not a good
format, I know, but it is very useful and in fact necessary for the web. I
would think it better to convert to JPG and then sharpen rather than sharpen
in TIFF and then convert. I haven't tested but I think it would result in
Because it doesn't clip the highlights or the shadows. Using levels and
curves in PS will bring the image back to life, but there are times when you
want/need to keep the lightest highlight or the darkest shadow.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Petru Lauric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
This is how Vuescan is designed to work - to NOT clip any highlights or
shadows, but to leave that for postprocessing in PS or other program where
you can examine the image more closely and determine what if any endpoint
clipping to do, and set your black and white point with much more accuracy.
Double-click on the gray eyedropper and you can pick the values you want for
the gray value in your image, be it 128-128-128 or any other setting.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Lodriguss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:40 AM
Subject:
All or nothing deal.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tris Schuler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:06 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
I use it on an LS2000 it saves me 3-5 hours a week. That's worth
real money!
I don't know how your finances are, but IMHO it is not worth fixing - you can move up
to a 17 monitor, a cheapie for $200 U.S. or less or quality for $300-400 U.S.
You can always keep the old monitor for a dual-monitor system and live with the
jumping.
OTOH it could possibly be the video card
Art,
I didn't read your comment as pompous or even close to it. It was humorous when taken
with a grain of salt and I even enjoyed it.
Tony does give us a lot of leeway on this list, and I sincerely appreciate it.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mail-archive.com/filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Philip Elkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Archive
Just deleted all my messages in OE. What is the archive address please
To be a bit more specific, you can scan at 16-bit depth and Elements will open the
image but will convert it automatically to 8-bit depth.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Berry Ives [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject:
Version 7.5 is coming out in a few days according to Ed and it (if I recall his
message correctly) will put the raw scan back to what it was like before. If not, you
can certainly run 2 versions of Vuescan simultaneously (hopefully you've retained the
earlier versions on your hard drive).
First of all, on the Device Tab, first box, change Option types to Advanced.
Since your scanning prints your Media type would be Image For the faded colors, you
might experiment with the Restore Colors option on the Filter tab. For 16-bit
color, change the TIFF file type to 48 bit RGB, and
For the basics of Color Management, try these out:
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/13605.html
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/13036.html
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/2440.html
http://www.computer-darkroom.co.uk/
(see especially the Essay Configuring Photoshop 6
The most important is the scanner so that your input is of the best quality possible.
You can always visually compensate for a poor monitor. You can always work on the
image with whatever software you prefer. And if your printer is not good enough you
can send it out for printing.
Maris
Most major video cards will do fine.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Alex Zabrovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Video card for imaging
Well, to be on-topic one additional question which is related to PC
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Video card for imaging
Thanks.
So there is no point to spend more then minimum for today's video adapter,
right ? (80-150 $ are fine)
Regards,
Alex Z
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
Sr.
Sent
Web archives for this list may be found at :-
http://www.mail-archive.com/filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/
Regards
Tony Sleep
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Dawn Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002
Be sure that Disable device events is checked in the scanner Properties box.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:32 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Epson 2450 on a Mac + Vuescan
On Wed, 02 Jan 2002
You should clear your browser's cache and try again - 7.3.10 showed up fine for me.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Paul Chefurka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 3:13 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.3.10 Available
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001
It is very slow *period* - I have a 700MHz Pentium with 576MB RAM
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Mark T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Neat Image noise/grain removal prog, was'Anyone Have Exp
Consider Corel PhotoPaint also - it will do much more than Photoshop Elements and you
can get the CorelDRAW 9 suite for under $50. AFAIK PSP will do more than Photoshop
Elements as well, but Elements will have an easy learning curve.
You can download Elements to try it out. I believe you can
I am trying out the demo and I have not been impressed either. I am more impressed
with NEAT.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Mark T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 5:01 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Anyone Have Experience
Neat Image is a digital filter designed to reduce visible noise in digital
photographic images.
http://absoft.nm.ru/
It presently supports only JPG and BMP files so you will have to convert from TIFF to
BMP first, but I wrote them and they responded that they are working on TIFF support
I'm not sure about removing the program itself from the hard drive, but to prevent it
from loading just remove its icon from the Startup folder in the Start-Programs menu.
You can also do this by Run-msconfig-Startup - uncheck the box for Adobe Gamma.
Either way the next time you boot up Adobe
So, does 3.1.2 run on Win98SE as well?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT
|
I have only downloaded the demo but I would certainly get the plug-in:
with the stand-alone you would have two procedures to do separately. With the plug-in
you can make any adjustments you want first (levels, contrast or whatever) if you
wish, run iCorrect as a filter, and then finish up
Try scanning it sideways and then rotate in Photoshop.
Why it opens almost black in PS6 I don't know - try scanning it with Vuescan, using
the Image setting rather than Slide
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Herb Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December
You cover it all!
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Histogram
| In a message dated 12/16/2001 9:46:17 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| writes:
|
| What scale do other
I would go the Advanced Workflow Suggestions route and lock in the film color, using
White Balance.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: P Elkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:44 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan - film types
| I rely on
Whether it is worth your time or not is up to you - probably not, I would say, because
you may well move up to a 4000spi scanner some day and then you will want to rescan
again. Rescan only as needed IMHO.
For optimal archival longevity the Kodak Ultima would be better, but to save money and
Thanks, Ed - I've made this mistake, too (thankfully not often) so this will help very
much.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan file overwrite warning
| In a message
Possible Qimage at http://www.ddisoftware.com/qimage
It is a printing program and will batch-rotate for printing, but I don't know whether
you can batch-rotate and then save as rotated. Mike Chaney is the developer and is as
responsive as Ed Hamrick is - go the site and send him an e-mail
On the Files tab be sure the TIFF file name is .0001+.tif
On the Prefs tab check Add extensions
Maris
P.S. Please send messages in plain text.
- Original Message -
From: HEREDIA, ARMANDO J
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:07 PM
Subject: RE:
If the descreening you are thinking of is in the scanner TWAIN software the answer is
no. Vuescan bypasses the TWAIN software.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: P Elkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:57 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan
Yes, but that would require a preview rescan anyway, which could be made automatic,
absent a MAJOR modification of the program.
But I'm not a programmer so I'll leave any further comments to Ed.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Hersch Nitikman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check Dell Computer for monitors, too - last I heard (and what I have) they carry a
Dell-branded 19 Sony Trinitron as well as others. Mine went bad and Dell did the
same - shipped a new one overnight, and had me return the old in the same box at their
expense.
Maris
- Original Message
I have the Nikon LS-30 with Nikonscan. I used Nikonscan for about a week - had to
fiddle around with numerous level and curve controls etc., got a good result but I
still had to re-adjust it all in (at that time) Corel PhotoPaint. The image as seen
on the NikonScan panels was not of good
I don't know what causes it but I don't think it is anything you did in the cleaning
process - maybe different film types, maybe some difference in processing.
Once you get them sleeved I think they will flatten out after a while.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tomasz Zakrzewski
I have to weigh in on the interface - it may not be top-notch graphics design with
buttons and shortcuts, but it is IMHO extremely functional and easy to use. I don't
need the buttons when I have useful tabs and boxes on the tabs.
I was up and running with it within an hour as I recall, and
Insight vs. Silverfast AI vs. Vuescan
| 2001-12-04-17:54:39 Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.:
| I was up and running with it within an hour as I recall, and the
| results have (almost) always been excellent (exceptions are
| exceptional frames - my fault, or old film, etc.)
|
| I am happy with the interface
Check the handbook and/or the Help files - there is a method, short of reinstalling,
involving deleting (after saving of course) a Preferences file and then re-opening
Photoshop.
Also, if I am not mistaken Photoshop puts some files on the C: drive in Windows 98SE,
directory
C:\Windows\
Bernhard,
Do you mean beautiful the way the program looks onscreen, or beautiful in the results
it provides? :-)
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Bernhard Ess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid Insight
What scanner to you use? Do you usually (always) scan slides or film? And what
specifically wrong with the scan results? Then we could make suggestions.
One of the common complaints about Vuescan is that the image is bland or washed-out,
but this is what Vuescan is designed to do. Most
Tris,
Try it. It is the easiest-to-learn program I use for graphics except for viewers.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tris Schuler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid Insight vs. Silverfast AI vs.
There is an excellent discussion of this at
http://www.pctechguide.com/06crtmon.htm
I have a Sony Trinitron 19 myself and am very pleased with it.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Jim Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:13 PM
Subject: Re:
Not to beat a dead horse, but Vuescan will do a RAW scan as well, and if you were to
take a 1/2-hour break from learning Silverfast I guarantee even you would know enough
to use Vuescan well.
I have also tried working with RAW scans - the primary problem with negative film is
the orange mask
Try out Vuescan and compare the 3 for yourself. Personally I prefer Vuescan, but many
others prefer Insight or Silversoft.
The download is free and will leave a watermark on the scan but other than that is
fully functional.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
No difference in performance or scan quality.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:03 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan IV - positioning
|
| Hi all,
|
| Quick, and possibly dumb, question: all
In Levels select a point that you think should be gray and check the RGB numbers of
the point. Then double-click the gray (middle) eyedropper and type in identical
numbers for the gray value you want there, e.g. R-128 G-128 B-128.
Close the box and then click on that spot with the gray
Read the Advanced Workflow Suggestions section of the help file and lock in a test
exposure. It worked for me on Superia 800..
Working in sRGB is fine, but you might look into profiling your monitor with
Colorvision's Spyder with Photocal, and into printer profiles using either software
such
To answer what Roger didn't:
2. Preview means it will focus at the time of preview but will not refocus at scan,
Scan means it will not focus for the preview (can save time) but will focus for the
scan, and Always means it focuses both times.
3. No with the Canon 2710 to my knowledge.
Try the Generic setting, and the Advanced Workflow Suggestions to lock in exposure for
the roll.
Then if you feel experimental try different individual brightness settings on the
Color panel, esp. Red - try different combinations, maybe higher red and lower blue.
You can change it, then
Have you tried converting to LAB and then adjusting the curve in the L channel only?
See the last section of http://www.ledet.com/margulis/LABCorrection.pdf
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Jawed Ashraf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 4:00 AM
-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
| Sr.
| Sent: 22 November 2001 17:50
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan
|
|
| Have you tried converting to LAB and then adjusting the curve in
| the L channel
I find the Kodak Supra 400 is too grainy for my 2700spi Nikon LS-30.
I like Kodak's Royal Gold 100 and 200, the Fujicolor NPS 160, and especially the
Konica Impressa 50.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Herb Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21,
First question - how large do you like to print? If larger than 8 1/2 x 11 then you
probably should get a 4000spi scanner instead of the Acer. If not then the Acer
should be fine.
The grain that prints out - do you see it onscreen as well or only in the print? If
only in the print then it
The best place to start is at http://www.scantips.com/
Wayne Fulton's information is succinct and accurate and will give you much good
information. He also sells a book including more information, though I have not
bought it.
Optimal resolution to be sent to an hp printer is 300dpi, and to an
I only see 3.1 there.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:50 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update
| There is a new Nikonscan 3.1.1 out today
| go to nikon homepage
| Mikael Risedal
|
|
/download/download_11.htm
|
| Mikael Risedal
|
| From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update
| Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:16:24 -0600
|
| I only see 3.1 there.
|
| Maris
|
| - Original
Try out Vuescan and see if you like it - trial download is free.
The essential differences are that Vuescan is designed to (and does) capture *all*
information from the slide or film, and then you adjust color, tone and contrast in
Photoshop.
Silverfast is designed to do color, tone and
Is a digital camera an option for you? It would be the quickest and easiest for
on-the-spot display - just download to the laptop.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:12 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Quick / Quality
The dandruff could be noise but it is more likely film grain - it is generally most
noticeable in areas of similar color such as skies. If it is grain, upgrading will
not help, but Vuescan's grain reduction filter should - try it and see.
To upgrade to some kind of ICE, would cost $500 and up
You have hit on the key difference between display resolution of ppi and print
resolution, but there is an additional point as well:
Yes, the number of dots used by the printer to print the display pixel is set by the
print resolution.
But further, each printer dot is produced by a number of
Thank you Preston!
Ken, that is the Chapter I was thinking of - Dan talks about dots, spots, and every
other kind of resolution.
Download the article and read it - meanwhile buy his book.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Preston Earle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
In addition to Simon's suggestion, I sometimes have to invert the film strip, and
sometimes - when the film is cut poorly - even have cut some of the between-frame
blank space at the end of the strip.
I like Simon's suggestion better, though.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Marc S.
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to run this test and to post the results.
To me it's clear that VueScan's 7.2.3+ grain-reduction filter is a substantial
improvement over 7.1.23 and 7.1.25
Thanks, Ed, for the improvement.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shomler [EMAIL
If you're using PS, click on each the points in the image that you want to set, check
the read numbers, then click, in the separate channels, on the curve at or about that
point, they type in the read number in the input box and your desired output number in
the output box. Do this for each
On the files tab, be sure to use a number (it can be a name and number or just a
number), and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, be sure you have a plus sign after the number and just
before the .tif or .jpg
It's the plus sign after the number that saves the scans sequentially and prevents
accidental
As long as the plus sign is present, yes it does.
If the plus sign is not present it will overwrite. Don't ask me why - it's Ed's way
of doing it. :-)
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 11:46 AM
The colors are consistent - you can get a goodly full listing in Vuescan's Help files
under Film Types.
What the RGB values are - I haven't the foggiest. Scan one on a flatbed as an image
and check it.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Dana Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: filmscanners
Thank you for the report, Bill. Frankly, I very much questioned what you had said but
had no solid information with which to dispute it.
I use PhotoCal myself (I'm an amateur) and I'm very satisfied with my Sony Trinitron
(Dell-branded) monitor.
I have a Solux desklamp and I find it provides
-0600 8-11-01, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
| Thank you for the report, Bill. Frankly, I very much questioned
| what you had said but had no solid information with which to dispute
| it.
|
| I use PhotoCal myself (I'm an amateur) and I'm very satisfied with
| my Sony Trinitron (Dell-branded) monitor
It sounds like a fantastic solution to many problems - too bad it's so expensive.
Thanks for the info, though!
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Jack Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners:
David,
There is a goldmine of information there! Thanks again.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Photshop resource
| Julieanne Kost works
Re Pentax lenses, check out PUG Pentax Lens Gallery:
http://gemma.geo.uaic.ro/~vdonisa/lensgal.html
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT: Places to ask about lenses?
Geraghty wrote:
|
| Is it possible to set the input directory and the output directory to
| different
| values? If so, can't you use identical filenames?
|
| I am doing exactly that at the moment, but am still limited to consecutive
| file names.
|
| Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
|
| The work
You are correct, Rob - different directories, can be identical filenames.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Bulk scanning with Vuescan
| Maris
You can do that.
From the Help files, Advanced Workflow Suggestions:
You can later batch-process these raw files by changing the Device|Scan from option
to Disk, and set the Device|Frame numbers option to 1-N. For instance, if you
produce raw files named scan0001.tif, scan0002.tif, ...,
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
