.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to listser...@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
) won't
work. But I would save the 'uncleaned' files in the archive collection,
and apply the cleaning filter only at the stage of processing an image
for a particular use.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail
Norman Carver wrote:
Peter,
Re your query on copying:
I used the holder that came with the Nikon 8000 --not perfect but workable
I set it vertically in a small aluminum channel, with emulsion (dull)
side towards camera.
Behind this is curved white paper lit by two electronic flash at
5d (Mark I), Canon FD Auto
Bellows, 50mm FD macro lens, and slide copier attachment. The results
looked hopeful, but I have not had time to refine the method.)
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to listser
of which concern film
scanning.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
subscriber since, oh, ever so long ago
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
Tony Sleep wrote:
The list should now be operating normally again.
Thanks Tony, let's see if this reply shows up on the list.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 3:16 PM Sam McCandless wrote:
I'm guessing Thunderbird is Windows-only.
I'm on a Mac and still use Eudora. It lets me quote selectively, and
I like its spam filter.
Thunderbird is available (free!) for Windows, OSX and Linux:
http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Dieder Bylsma wrote:
try using it without ICE and see what happens
Thanks for the suggestion, Dieder. I just did a test with and without ICE -- it
made no difference to the waves.
Any other ideas?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
.
In the meantime I am still interested to hear speculations about the cause, and
to hear of any other sightings of this phenomenon.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
have. Your suggestion of a mechanical
glitch is very plausible.
Thanks for thinking about it, Tony. And thanks (again) for keeping this list
going -- the dwindling crew of old fogies still doing this stuff relies on the
advice to be found here.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
(with, for example, a piece of credit card held on with adhesive
tape).
Does this apply to the current model, does anyone know?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
for illumination.
Something to consider...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
From: Peter Marquis-Kyle
You might consider using a Canon FD Auto Bellows with the slide
duplicator accessory and, say, a 50mm macro lens. This would make
the business of framing, magnification and focus straightforward.
(If you were in Australia I'd lend this gear
Berry Ives wrote:
Think about having someone shoot some T400 CN film at your wedding.
Then
you can have some fun scanning and printing BW
Nah, too easy. What about Kodachrome. LS-30s just love Kodachrome :)
Peter Marquis-Kyle
lists or forums, may support better-balanced debate.
If you do shut down the list I won't blame you. What you've done for
me -- through your scanner reviews and this list -- has been terrific.
Thanks for doing it!
Peter Marquis-Kyle
list member since February 1999
Brad Davis wrote:
Further, if you find that Laurie's response was
anything other than responsible, you have
demonstrated a complete lack of understanding
of what she so gently said. She didn't agree with
him, she suggested only that those who disagree
provide evidence to support their case.
device profile by scanning and analysing an IT8
or Q60 target. Of course this is only good for that
particular scanner and type of positive transparency
film, and can't adjust for the vagaries of lighting,
subject or camera.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
I just checked my copy of VueScan
...It does not present a visual histogram
of the scanned image...
I guess you are using a pretty old version of Vuescan, Laurie?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
haven't tried scanning cross-processed negs, but I suggest you try
the Lock image color setting (it's on the Device tab -- you'll need
to display all the options).
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail
Shunith Dutt wrote:
Out of town for a few days...
Thanks for telling us, Shunith, but you really need to send your
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enjoy yourself!
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail
doesn't find your SCSI scanner, you
may need to download and install ASPI (you don't need this for USB scanners).
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
as the Strip Film Holder (FH-2) which I usually
prefer.
I generally use the Nikon software (Nikonscan) which is very convenient, but
sometimes resort to Vuescan when I want to get the most out of a difficult
original.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
anyone from stealing the image.
Just viewing the HTML source will reveal the location and filename of the real
image, which can then be downloaded.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Art
Thanks for the correction. I'm sorry I attributed the question to you -- an
innocent mistake.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: OT - Informed
Watch out, I think Tony's caught it...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 1:45 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] ADMIN: List charter alterations
Naturally I have received a complaint about my summary blockage of the Hard
Jan
Looks like you have version 1.05. If I were you I would update to version 1.1.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Peter,
Mine says Nikon Coolscan IV ED 1.05 @ USB
Is this the Firmware version?
Jan
Unsubscribe
version).
What does yours say?
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or
body
.
The listserver will bounce emails which contain large attachments.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Dave wrote:
I love making 24x36 prints on an Epson 7000 from 800 speed color negs
shot with a $90 point and shoot. Why? Because they look great.
What are you scanning the 800 speed film with, Dave?
Ah Rob, I expect you'll be reassured when you read the answer to that
be
prohibitive
No need to do that Rob. Even in the wilds of south east Queensland there are
competent people with drum scanners at the ready.
Or I can introduce you to a bloke in Brisbane with a couple of Imacons who knows
what he's doing
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
not. I used the test method
developed by Julian Robinson (
http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~julian/ls2000-focus.htm ) which I commend to
anyone with a Nikon film scanner.
An hour of testing was enough to show me what works well (and what doesn't) with
my scanner.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
an anti newton's rings
treatment -- put that side in contact with the film.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
with the instructions again:
http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~julian/ls2000-focus.htm
Peter Marquis-Kyle
the LS-4000? The capacity for
unattended scanning of whole rolls of film is a fine idea, but not useful if the
scans are out of focus over part of the image.
Since doing these tests I have avoided using the Strip Film Adapter for anything
but quick-and-dirty scans.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Rob
I don't remember having to do that, but perhaps I did. If it's relevant, my SCSI
card is a Tekram DC-315U.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter wrote:
Your presumption is correct. I have had Nikonscan (various versions
, Win 98SE, Win
2000.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Winsor Crosby asked
Could you not combine the scanned black and white separations as
layers in PhotoShop?
Yep. See this interesting example: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/
Peter Marquis-Kyle
-- Instamatic 126 cartridge film -- mostly cheap snapshot
cameras (see http://user.itl.net/~kypfer/126film.htm )
24mm x 24mm -- 35mm film exposed in early Robot cameras (see
http://www.cameraquest.com/robot1.htm )
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Silverfast software, SCSI card, cables, etc. See
http://www.scannerplace.com.au/p4000.htm
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Brisbane
- Original Message -
From: Tim Lumsdaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In all of the correspondence I've followed on this site, I've hardly
encountered anything relating to Microtek's
Starflash?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have never had to scan Kodachrome slides before (and never thought I'
have to!) but, as luck would have it, I have just been handed a huge
pile of them to scan.
I am using VueScan 7.1.7 on a PC
you how to do it.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
work, you should find the
answer.
Then (unlike me) you can contribute a really useful post to this list.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Frank Nichols asked
Can anyone point me to a good/active mailing list for discussions of ink jet
printers (specifically Epson) used to print my scans?
Sign up for the epson-inkjet list at http://www.leben.com/lists/
It is both good and ACTIVE!
Peter Marquis-Kyle
being in a postilion to do the same thing for the 35mm scanners - LS4000,
...don't you just love it when the spell checker does that? It just reminds me
how difficult it is to get good postilions these days.
. Here's what I found...
Thanks for that report Rob.
Like you, I use both Vuescan and NikonScan with my LS-30 (VS for careful work,
NS for quick-and-dirty jobs). Your report gives me the confidence to replace NS
2.5 with NS 3.1.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
://www.nikon.cz/ls4000.htm ). It looks like it does exactly the same job as
the FH-2.
If it does have full-frame openings, perhaps I should buy one. Or just take a
file to my FH-2.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Thanks for that, Vlad
Peter Marquis-Kyle
24.1 x 36.0 mm as I measured it. Extra 0,5 mm will be useful - it is rather
difficult to position the film precisely
a pixel more than the frame
width. In the other direction there is not the same problem -- the
scanner can capture beyond 36mm.
Do other makes or models of 35mm scanners score any better?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
-plumb columns, and add sham black borders, even fake sprocket holes
and frame numbers. I have already learned more about Photoshop than I ever knew
about darkroom printing
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
, I'll do just that...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
tangible improvements,
before I install 3.0.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Edwin Eleazer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:41 AM
Subject: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.0 with LS-30 Ls-2000
Anyone else using 3.0 with
Tony Sleep wrote
Personally I prefer enlargers with AN glass on the base side, open
frame on the
emulsion side, the best of both worlds. There has to be an
aftermarket
opportunity here for popular scanners, I'd happily pay 80-100GBP for
a really
good metal, half-glass adjustable strip holder
rints.
Anybody want to buy an EL-Nikkor and a nice Leitz Valoy enlarger?)
What sort of stuff are you scanning to blow up to 24x36? That's really
big!
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Brisbane Australia
/htdig/
But don't be shy about asking any on-topic question on the
list; people are helpful around here, and (mostly) not too
snobbish.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Hi Tom
If you haven't already seen it, take a look at this site:
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Review.htm
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Christiansen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: fi
resolution for inkjet printers.
Good luck, and keep asking questions...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: filmscanners: LS 2000 newbie question
I have recently purchased a LS 2000 scan
Is it normal for the LS-30 to automatically eject the film
from the scanner
after a certain amount of time of inactivity?
Yes (well, mine does anyway)
Peter Marquis-Kyle
system.
Details of the Piezography mailing list, and much else, are
at http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/piezographyBW.html
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 1/10/01 4:40:35 PM US Eastern Standard
Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The page is not indexed, nor is it likely to be until it and a lot of
other pages are
finished, as it's really part of Mk2 website.
Tony, I'm pleased the Mk2 website is still bubbling on the back burner. Your
aliasing page is very clear and useful. It bodes well for Mk2...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
by letter,
instead of reading them as ordinary words. But I don't
mind - in Tony's messages they are part of his accent, his
tone of voice, even a reminder of usenet, bulletin boards,
telex, telegraphic code books...
:-)
Peter Marquis-Kyle
| I fear this ancient language may have become extinct li
60 matches
Mail list logo
