[filmscanners] Re: Density vs Dynamic range

2002-06-11 Thread Stan McQueen
offends you, just add his name to your kill file. I'm sure that, sooner or later, he will be removed from the list and then in a few days or weeks he'll be back again by a different name. Stan Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com

[filmscanners] Re: Real-World Scene Brightness Range

2002-05-13 Thread Stan McQueen
At 09:56 AM 5/13/2002 +0100, David Hoffman wrote: At 15:50 -0600 10/5/02, Stan McQueen wrote: I don't recall ever seeing more than 6-7 stops, so I'm curious what type of scenes you have in mind I've not measured this but bright sun on a white shirt must be pretty close to 10 stops from dark

[filmscanners] RE: Real-World Scene Brightness Range

2002-05-12 Thread Stan McQueen
such a large range without compression? Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners

[filmscanners] Re: Real-World Scene Brightness Range

2002-05-11 Thread Stan McQueen
that they are quite common in your experience? If so, what are your common subjects? Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan Raw Files

2002-03-12 Thread Stan McQueen
Ah, quite right! That did it. Thanks, Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com At 08:23 AM 3/12/2002 +, Bob wrote: Stan, select 'Device option type advanced' or 'Device option type intermediate'. You should then see a checkbox on the Files tab

[filmscanners] VueScan Raw Files

2002-03-11 Thread Stan McQueen
I must not have been paying attention. What happened to raw files in VueScan? The version I got the other day, 7.5.5, doesn't show a Save Raw Files option on the files tab? Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan clipping

2002-01-07 Thread Stan McQueen
has long recommended that the Image setting be used for slides. Hmm. This, of course begs the question, why have the slide option? Tom Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Photography by Stan McQueen http://www.smcqueen.com

filmscanners: Multiple Pass Scanning on the SS4000

2001-12-02 Thread Stan McQueen
=== Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: PSP and 48-bit color question

2001-10-29 Thread Stan McQueen
At 10:18 AM 10/29/2001 -0800, Ken Durling wrote: I DL'd the eval version of PSP and I'm finding out why you like it so much. I just tried loading a .tiff file that was scanned in Vuescan at 48-bits, and I get the following message: A predictor of 2 is only supported for LZW compression on 8 and

Re: filmscanners: Question about Vuescan

2001-10-28 Thread Stan McQueen
and do something else while the scanning takes place. Very convenient. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Gizmo to make flatbed scan large format film?

2001-10-26 Thread Stan McQueen
, it does an excellent job for me. Your mileage may vary. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: ss 4000 eCost

2001-09-20 Thread Stan McQueen
for the rebate form. I've never ordered from them before, but I would definitely would do so again. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Mac users

2001-09-20 Thread Stan McQueen
At 03:39 PM 9/20/2001 -0400, Martin Greene wrote: With the idea of saving money and possibly getting a better scan, I gave up a Nikon LS4000 that I recently bought. I received the SS4000 from Ecost yesterday. So far, I am terribly disappointed. The documentation is terrible. Polacolor I find

Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?

2001-09-17 Thread Stan McQueen
and stored in archival plastic sheets or whatever you use now. Then, of course, you can delete the computer images of the slides not kept or you can archive them or whatever. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging

2001-09-07 Thread Stan McQueen
by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

RE: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging

2001-09-07 Thread Stan McQueen
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stan McQueen Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging At 12:04 PM 9/7/2001 +1000, Rob Gerahty wrote: The problem I experienced

RE: filmscanners: Selecting a scanner

2001-09-07 Thread Stan McQueen
think it is Polaroid's strategy because of their financial situation. Is there a new model coming out? -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

OT: Motorola 70GHz CPU (was RE: filmscanners: That's some overclocking)

2001-09-05 Thread Stan McQueen
of the future, and it always will be.) http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/04/business/04CHIP.html Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: FW: Mac World scanner review

2001-08-31 Thread Stan McQueen
know whether this review will eventually show up on their website? Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

RE: filmscanners: Vuescan and Kodak Infrared HIE BW colormask ?

2001-08-15 Thread Stan McQueen
by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan and Kodak Infrared HIE BW colormask ?

2001-08-14 Thread Stan McQueen
fine. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows

2001-07-28 Thread Stan McQueen
with version 7.1.7. Of course, it hasn't happened again since I turned on the log file, so maybe that's the answer. It doesn't want to get caught by Ed while misbehaving. :-) Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Bug?

2001-07-26 Thread Stan McQueen
via: USB Vuescan Version: 7.1.6 Forgot to mention I was saving to a 1-bit B/W Tiff file. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

filmscanners: Epson 1640SU

2001-07-25 Thread Stan McQueen
Oops, I meant to say 1640SU, not 1640U (it's just sitting right here beside me--you'd think I could read the label correctly). Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright (off-topic)

2001-07-23 Thread Stan McQueen
the date noted: 1. Registration Form 2. Fee of $30.00 3. Photography by Stan McQueen, 2001 Volume 3 (CD containing scanned images) They stamp it with their official stamp and return it to me. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright

2001-07-22 Thread Stan McQueen
will be to convince people that it is not worthwhile to go to the effort of registering their images. That would not be a Good Thing would it? Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright

2001-07-21 Thread Stan McQueen
pay your triple licensing fee in accordance with ASMP and EP practice rather than chance a suit over a registered image. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

RE: filmscanners: Digital Copyright

2001-07-21 Thread Stan McQueen
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stan McQueen Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 11:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Digital Copyright At 12:07 AM 7/22/2001 +1000, Rob Geraghty wrote: I note there's been some discussion of copyright lately. I just uploaded a stack of new

filmscanners: Need Filmstrip Holder

2001-07-20 Thread Stan McQueen
Last night my filmstrip holder for my old Microtek Scanmaker 35+ broke. It's still (barely) useable, but I really need a new one. Does anyone have any idea where parts for old Microtek scanners might be found? Thanks, Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen

Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150

2001-07-18 Thread Stan McQueen
MF = Medium Format (120 roll film sizes, typically) Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150

2001-07-17 Thread Stan McQueen
that this was a misprint. The 1640SU is being sold without the transparency adaptor for 149.77 after rebate. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150

2001-07-17 Thread Stan McQueen
There are several 1640SU Photo Scanners (with Transparency Unit) on sale at eBay with Buy It Now prices of $329. Search for 1640SU to find them. How good is the 1640SU? This price is approaching my threshold for an MF scanner. Stan === Photography by Stan

RE: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150

2001-07-17 Thread Stan McQueen
. That would make the final cost of the 1640SU with TPU $254. Seems like a winner for MF scanning. Now for some questions: 1. Has anybody tested this? How good is it? and 2. Does VueScan support it? Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http

RE: filmscanners: 1640SU @CompUSA $150

2001-07-17 Thread Stan McQueen
took a look at your comparisons. I'm sure it's better than my old Microtek ScanMaker X6 which is all I currently have for scanning MF. I'll let you know more after I get it. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

RE: filmscanners: Getting started question

2001-07-16 Thread Stan McQueen
offered on eBay is not Provia 100F, but the older Provia RDP II. 100F is also called RDP III. This is why it is available so cheaply. RDP II was a good film, but not as good as RDP III. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: When if Provia 100F a poor film to scan...underwater :-7

2001-07-12 Thread Stan McQueen
by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners

2001-06-21 Thread Stan McQueen
of the coating determines what wavelengths (I would normally use frequency but I don't want to confuse it with AC line frequency) will be emitted by the tube. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners

2001-06-21 Thread Stan McQueen
At 05:39 PM 6/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Stan McQueen wrote: Fluorescents flicker at the AC line frequency--60 Hz in the US. This is because, as you say, the fluorescent light is a plasma device. The discharge turns on and off at the line frequency

Re: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners

2001-06-21 Thread Stan McQueen
At 05:39 PM 6/21/2001 -0400, rafe b wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Stan McQueen wrote: Fluorescents flicker at the AC line frequency--60 Hz in the US. This is because, as you say, the fluorescent light is a plasma device. The discharge turns on and off at the line frequency

Re: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners

2001-06-21 Thread Stan McQueen
as the voltage crosses the zero point. There just isn't enough time before the voltage climbs back up on the other side. (As you said.) Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)

2001-06-15 Thread Stan McQueen
of tripod mounted), 60 lp/mm is about the best you'll ever get from an SLR. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)

2001-06-15 Thread Stan McQueen
. Of course, the difference may be too small to see with the naked eye if the difference in theoretical resolution is too small. That's because the eyeball also has a theoretical resolution. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans

2001-06-06 Thread Stan McQueen
Mac compatible SCSI card. Ouch! I don't think that I, for one, realized that Phil's G4 wouldn't use a standard SCISI card. Aparently, Acer didn't, either. I didn't even know that the G4 had a PCI bus. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks

2001-03-22 Thread Stan McQueen
so you can decide whether you need the upgrade before you even download. Stan === Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.6.1 Available

2001-02-02 Thread Stan McQueen
=== Photography by Stan McQueen: http://www.smcqueen.com