RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update

Does anybody succeded installing it? I have downloaded it twice and something like "bad CRC" message occured when installing it on my machine. Vlad -Pvodn zprva- Od: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]za uivatele Mikael Risedal Odeslno: 20. listopadu 2001 14:50 Komu: [EMAIL

RE: filmscanners: URL: Nikonscan 3.1.1 update

- Go to thr LS4000 scanner and next to Nikonscan 3.1.1 Little bit faster, better memory handling. etc Mikael Risedal - Mikael, I have downloaded it twice, both versions were corrupted and could not be installed (PC). Because both were identical (compared byte by byte) I

RE: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000

I agree with you Bill absolutely. LS IVED behaves in the same way. I agree with units you mentioned - which applied to real word mean to measure via the software uneveness of film position in the holder which must not be more than 12 units and to put focus in the middle. If the number is higher

RE: filmscanners: Canon 4000 ppi film scanner

I would say the truth is somewhere in the middle. Scanning freshly developed film without ICE and using e.g. tablet (even the cheapest) wil typically take me just few minutes - frequently less than one. Using appropriate software (e.g. Pentools/pen duster -bonus software for Graphire) will

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE

With clean film, ICE shouldn't have anything to do. Regards Tony Sleep Tony there IS a difference - less apparent grain and slightly less contrast at highest picture frequencies (app. 60 lp/mm). Whole picture is affected. Vlad --- Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolováno antivirovým

RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

- Original Message - From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4 Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than my Minolta was! You can here the motors

RE: filmscanners: LS-4000 - Nikon Scan 3.0 crashes under Win98 SE

The problem is that the Nikon scanner software (Nikon Scan 3.0) constantly crashes, especially when I try to use ICE or other advanced features. I'm running Windows 98 Second Edition. Any ideas what might be wrong? Yes I think these are known problems. Though I do not have LS 4000 but Coolscan

RE: filmscanners: LS4000 slide removed from mount

I just measured the FH-2 holder with a vernier calliper. Each frame opening is 23.5mm wide, 35.5mm long -- that means it's masking .25mm of each edge of the image. What size openings does the FH-3 holder have? 24.1 x 36.0 mm as I measured it. Extra 0,5 mm will be useful - it is rather

RE: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners

Maris wrote: I have now tried Kodak Supra 400 and, on the LS-30 at 2700spi it scans better than average but I would not consider it exceptional. I still have grain in blue skies and, My experience with Supra 400 is very good. Very little grain-alliasing no matter in which channel (skin,

RE: filmscanners: USB and data transfer as a constraint on time needed to scan

I work both with Elite/SCSI and Dual II/USB and I see very little difference (if any) in scan speed. Each will take app. 3 minutes for full res scan (With ICE in case of Elite). My machine is Celeron 450 with 320MB memory, scan time was measured with freshly restarted WIN98SE and no app. running