[filmscanners] RE: ADMIN: was RE: Density vs Dynamic rangeAUSTIN (2a) - To the MODERATOR

2002-06-24 Thread Alex Zabrovsky
, June 23, 2002 9:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: ADMIN: was RE: Density vs Dynamic rangeAUSTIN (2a) - To the MODERATOR Now it is down to people's self-consciousness to realize that this List isn't the very appropriate place for such long and annoying threads going off

[filmscanners] RE: ADMIN: was RE: Density vs Dynamic rangeAUSTIN (2a) - To the MODERATOR

2002-06-23 Thread Alex Zabrovsky
threads going off-topic more and more. Regards, Alex Z -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] ADMIN: was RE: Density vs Dynamic rangeAUSTIN (2a

[filmscanners] Re: ADMIN: was RE: Density vs Dynamic rangeAUSTIN (2a) - ...

2002-06-23 Thread
I have to say, I have been following this 'debate' from afar. Very afar, because after the first few posts I, frankly, lost interest. However, I also wholehearedly agree with Austin's post here. I do not see how anyone could say that the discussion was off topic for a filmscanner list. Not my

[filmscanners] Re: ADMIN: was RE: Density vs Dynamic rangeAUSTIN(2a) - ...

2002-06-23 Thread Don Marcotte
Oh no! Let's not start a long debate about whether it was On or Off topic! Can we not let this item rest in peace? Don At 06:58 PM 23/06/2002 -0400, you wrote: I have to say, I have been following this 'debate' from afar. Very afar, because after the first few posts I, frankly, lost interest.