The original post asked about a comparison between the Olympus P-400 and
the Epson 1280. Possibly, the subject line became truncated from the
original, or maybe the original poster just tied out while writing the
subject and didn't finish it ;-)
Art
John C. Jernigan wrote:
Will someone
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:37:55 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
But over time things have become completely ridiculous;
The 740, 750, 760 are 4 color (1440 dpi)
The 750 is in the photo class (a 6 color)
Still ridiculous anyway... :-)
--
Have a good day!
Raymond Carles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Geraghty) wrote:
Nick Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my order for the Epson 1280.
Does anyone know whether the 1280 in north america is the same as the
1290
elsewhere?
I believe it is.
Heaven knows why Epson chose to do this considering the 890 is the same
Will someone please tell me what this thread has to do with the Olympus
P-400 printer ???
Derek Clarke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Geraghty) wrote:
Nick Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my order for the Epson 1280.
Does anyone know whether the 1280 in north america is the same as
At 06:37 PM 6/8/01, you wrote:
I give up!
Art, before completely giving up...using the Occam's Razor principle of
communication, if you did not have a printer today, and you were buying
one, knowing all that you know and feel, which printer would you buy?
Marvin
Yes, exactly the same specs, just different power supply and software.
--James Hill
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ???
Nick Taylor [EMAIL
Thanks to all for your input. After looking at the print quality in
a local (an hours drive away) I decided that the P-400's quality
didn't justify the large price increase ... so I'm going to place
my order for the Epson 1280.
Regards,
-Nick T.
Nick Taylor wrote:
Sorry about the off
Nick Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my order for the Epson 1280.
Does anyone know whether the 1280 in north america is the same as the 1290
elsewhere?
Rob
Raymond Carles wrote:
You're comparing two VERY different beasts here!
While the Epson is an inkjet printer, the Olympus is a fast dye
sublimation (not inkjet) printer, one can use to print directly from a
digital camera, no computer needed...
This is a good point, although the
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Nick Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my order for the Epson 1280.
Does anyone know whether the 1280 in north america is the same as the 1290
elsewhere?
Rob
Oh gawd, Epson and their numbering system! I think I made an error in
my previous comments about the
Nick Taylor wrote:
Sorry about the off topic post, but I think that most everyone
that uses a film scanner also has some printer experience.
I'm considering a replacement for my Epson Stylus Color 800
inkjet printer. Two printers have been highly recommended to
me, the Epson Photo
You're comparing two VERY different beasts here!
While the Epson is an inkjet printer, the Olympus is a fast dye
sublimation (not inkjet) printer, one can use to print directly from a
digital camera, no computer needed...
--
Have a good day!
Raymond Carles
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:12:21 -0700,
I would strongly recommend the 1280, or the 1270 for even cheaper
results if the 1280's edge to edge printing isn't a concern. The
Epson photo printers are capable of much better results than even
darkroom prints when fed the right image file. The 1270 is a 1440 dpi
printer with excellent
on 6/6/01 5:55 PM, Nick Taylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering a replacement for my Epson Stylus Color 800
inkjet printer. Two printers have been highly recommended to
me, the Epson Photo Stylus 1280 and the Olympus P-400. Does
anyone here have experience with either or both of
Sorry about the off topic post, but I think that most everyone
that uses a film scanner also has some printer experience.
I'm considering a replacement for my Epson Stylus Color 800
inkjet printer. Two printers have been highly recommended to
me, the Epson Photo Stylus 1280 and the Olympus
This is specious experience to say the least, but I
looked at the output (in the form of the sample book,
and what Olympus likely feels is flattering to the
product) from the Olympus at the store the other day
and I was seriously underwhelmed by the quality of
it's output. Images were uniformly
16 matches
Mail list logo
