I took a look at your scanned image (a nice image, BTW). The fact that
the flare only becomes visible on boosting levels, might mean you are
experiencing blooming, which is why I asked in my earlier posting if the
the exposure seemed correct. However, there seems to be excessive
blooming
Art
Thanks for your comments. I am rescanning the slide today to see whether the
problem is the same or has changed with time. It is possible that it is
blooming from slightly higher than average exposure. However, the slides do
not look underexposed - just a little dense and saturated. I
I have posted an image which shows the bleed onto a page on our website - it
can be seen at http://www.imagequest3d.com/flaring/
I have experienced the streaking that Harry describes as well - but not since
I switched from the Coolscan III to the LS 2000.
I will try rescanning the images when I
I have posted an image which shows the bleed onto a page on our website -
it
can be seen at http://www.imagequest3d.com/flaring/
I have experienced the streaking that Harry describes as well - but not
since
I switched from the Coolscan III to the LS 2000.
I will try rescanning the
At 5:06 am -0400 6/6/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
using the LS2000 for some time now and have been very pleased
with the results. Just recently however we have put through a batch of slides
with subjects against black backgrounds. The scans have all got a hazy halo
round all the bright areas
I
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, David Hoffman wrote:
At 5:06 am -0400 6/6/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the results. Just recently however we have put through a batch of slides
with subjects against black backgrounds. The scans have all got a hazy halo
round all the bright areas
I doubt that it's
That makes a lot of sense, and seems to equate to what I saw in the stars
test (viz pinholes in black leader). Different scanners appear to show
different results, but *some* haloing seems to be universal, in all the
tests I've seen.
I'd like to be proven wrong on this one, if anyone has
At 1:40 pm +0300 12/6/01, Harry Lehto wrote:
The black backgound
close to a bright spot is very unforgiving for such things. If your halos
move to the outer side of your bright image then I believe that it is
a reflection or a comalike distortion. If they stay only as halos
centered on your
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 05:06:21 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The scans have all got a hazy halo
round all the bright areas such that on an A4 print there is about 15 -
20mm around the bright area which is less than total black.
Sounds like flare, from dust/oil/water on the lens.
Regards
Hi All
We have been using the LS2000 for some time now and have been very pleased
with the results. Just recently however we have put through a batch of slides
with subjects against black backgrounds. The scans have all got a hazy halo
round all the bright areas such that on an A4 print there
1st question:
How many people smoke near where the scanner is located? Or cook fried
foods? Or was the unit moved that day from a cold to warm place?
The most common cause of halos in a scanner which seemed fine in the
past, is an accumulation of residue on the lenses optics of ccd surface.
11 matches
Mail list logo
