Dave Suurballe wrote:
Good idea; certainly worth considering...
I'm scanning now with a Kodak RFS 3600, and it doesn't scan outside the
standard frame dimensions.
Dave
Speaking of the RFS-3600, Kodak is again lowering prices on it. They
are now offering 3600 frames of film (100
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:53:14 +1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: The whole frame
Peter wrote:
I am annoyed that my Nikon LS-30 can't scan a whole 35mm frame.
Peter, is the amount lost
on 6/5/01 1:33 PM, Dave Suurballe wrote:
I would love to see a scanner that can scan from film edge to film edge, not
just the exposed frame in the middle.
That's because I'm scanning negatives which have a serial number exposed on
the film outside the sprocket holes and it would be great
: filmscanners: The whole frame
on 6/5/01 1:33 PM, Dave Suurballe wrote:
I would love to see a scanner that can scan from film edge to film edge, not
just the exposed frame in the middle.
That's because I'm scanning negatives which have a serial number exposed on
the film outside the sprocket holes
Peter wrote:
Fair question Rob -- the amount lost is small of course.
But I like to assemble the elements of the picture within
the whole frame before the exposure, and I like the
evidence of that to show in the print.
Fair enough. I confess I've never done a test to find out exactly what
I am annoyed that my Nikon LS-30 can't scan a whole 35mm frame.
With my old Leitz enlarger I could project the whole 24x36mm frame, plus about
1mm of clear film all round. I used to print the whole frame, including the
black border as evidence that the image was complete and uncropped. (Ah, the
Peter wrote:
I am annoyed that my Nikon LS-30 can't scan a whole 35mm frame.
Peter, is the amount lost significant? I mean it must be to you since you're
annoyed about it, but in my experience I can generally scan more of the
image on the frame than has ever appeared on a photographic print.
Rob Geraghty replied to me
Peter wrote:
I am annoyed that my Nikon LS-30 can't scan a whole 35mm frame.
Peter, is the amount lost significant? I mean it must be to you since you're
annoyed about it, but in my experience I can generally scan more of the
image on the frame than has ever
