Rodrigo Amestica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. after getting a preview, why does the GREEN histogram change when I
modify the RED gain (after pressing redraw)?
Is it possible to adjust the gain of the colours separately? I seem to
recall Ed talking about different integration times for the
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Rodrigo Amestica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. after getting a preview, why does the GREEN histogram change when I
modify the RED gain (after pressing redraw)?
Is it possible to adjust the gain of the colours separately? I seem to
recall Ed talking about different
Hi, related with the analog gains I would appreciate any enlightenment
about the following:
(my system is an LS2000+NikonScan 3.1)
1. after getting a preview, why does the GREEN histogram change when I
modify the RED gain (after pressing redraw)? Before even buying an
scanner I always thought
I prefer to
fine-tune color, contrast and everything else in post-scan processing in
Photopaint or Photoshop or PSP or whatever your favorite program is.
Thanks Maris - is their any benefit to be had by doing things this way as
opposed to doing it up-front? Other than , I suppose , when
At 12:51 24-07-01 +1000, Julian Robinson wrote:
I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report with
Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly and with great
control.
In general I agree with that and especially appreciate the control that NS
gives me.
Message -
From: Steve Woolfenden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan question
| I prefer to
| fine-tune color, contrast and everything else in post-scan processing in
| Photopaint or Photoshop or PSP or whatever your
Thanks Marc , didnt know you were here too! I'll
check this out.
Steve
Steve,
You
may want to check out http://www.scantips.com
Marc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan question
I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report
with
Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly and with
great
control. I bought Vuescan
At 12:51 PM 7/24/01 +1000, Julian wrote:
Last time I tried Vuescan's IR dust removal I found it didn't work as well
for me as ICE, but this may have improved since then, or at least I should
say it definitely has improved going by what I have read here.
The bottom line for me is that I have
Julian Robinson wrote:
I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report with
Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly and with great
control.
Hi, Julian, Hi all,
same here :-)
I bought Vuescan after reading how much better it was, but have
not found
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Woolfenden
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:27 PM
To: FILMSCANNERS
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan question
I'm a little apprehensive asking this question considering the present
debate , but , I'm a total
]]On Behalf Of Steve
WoolfendenSent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:27 PMTo:
FILMSCANNERSSubject: filmscanners: Vuescan
question
I'm a little apprehensive asking this question
considering the present debate , but , I'm a total novice to scanning and
you've got to start somewhere
I've just
of
scanner features for a long time!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Woolfenden
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 5:27 PM
To: FILMSCANNERS
Subject: filmscanners: Vuescan question
I'm a little apprehensive asking this question considering the present
In a message dated 6/5/2001 5:28:40 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you perhaps post an example of what the infrared scan looks like of
a typical image?
You can do this yourself by setting Files|TIFF file type to 16 bit
Infrared.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
Well, I could if I had a scanner which did IR scans, but I don't ;-)
Could someone please send me an IR scan of an image (slide or neg, just
tell me which it is) to look at? I'd like to see what IR sees
Perhaps that might help me to better understand this whole process.
Art
[EMAIL
In a message dated 6/5/2001 11:11:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I noticed a deep scratch in one of my negs, so I turned on Light Clean
in the Filter tab and scanned from Disk again.
The scratch disappeared.
Yes, this is what should happen.
So I suppose my question is: if Clean
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:29:20 EDT, you wrote:
This is controlled by the Device|Bits per pixel setting. If you can
with it set to 64 bit RGBI (the default), there will be an infrared
channel in the raw scan file.
Great, thanks: that answered my question perfectly.
In a message dated 6/4/2001 10:38:06 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm guessing, but I would be surprised that the infrared light
scan would have very much noise artifacting in it.
The exact same CCD and A/D converter is used to scan the
image in infrared and visible light. The only
Hi Ed,
Again, not to be argumentative, but, I do understand it is the same CCD.
That isn't the issue. We know that, for instance, typically the blue
scan is noisier than the green or red, right?
I have no idea what type of response the infrared sensitivity of the CCD
is, but I'm (guessing)
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 05:11:56 EDT, you wrote:
The exact same CCD and A/D converter is used to scan the
image in infrared and visible light. The only difference between
the two scan passes is which lamp is turned on.
I've just purchased an LS-2000 and am clambering up the learning
curve. My
In a message dated 6/3/2001 10:55:46 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unlike Nikons, doesn't this scanner insist the IR channel scan
separately from the RGB scan ... ie, a 2nd pass. I thought the
original post was stating, if he wanted 16x RGB passes, it also
scanned the IR 16x. There
I don't mean to question your authority on this, since I don't own a
2740 and you probably have worked with one, however, I am trying to
understand the mechanism of this situation.
I understand that dICE works by doing a comparison of the infrared image
and the visible image and does some
Walter Bushell wrote:
Dear Mr. Hamrick:
Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when doing
multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do an IR scan every
time?
With my ScanWit 2740 scanner it takes about 35 minutes to do a 16 pass
scan (including the 16 IR
Rob writes ...
Walter Bushell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when
doing
multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do an IR scan
every
time?
If you want to have the cleaning features in Vuescan work, you need
the IR channel.
Dear Mr. Hamrick:
Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when doing
multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do an IR scan every
time?
With my ScanWit 2740 scanner it takes about 35 minutes to do a 16 pass
scan (including the 16 IR scans), with a 666* Pentium III and
Walter Bushell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when doing
multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do an IR scan every
time?
If you want to have the cleaning features in Vuescan work, you need
the IR channel. Bu there's no need to
Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Question
| Walter Bushell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when doing
| multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do
27 matches
Mail list logo
