Re: [Firebird-docs] Review Firebird 4.0 Language Reference

2021-05-24 Thread Alexey Kovyazin
Hello, I think, the good idea will be to include link to it to the launch message for release of 4.0. Regards, Alexey On 24.05.2021 19:18, Mark Rotteveel wrote: I 'soft-launched' the language reference and put it online on https://firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-rdbms/ and

Re: [Firebird-docs] Review Firebird 4.0 Language Reference

2021-05-24 Thread Mark Rotteveel
I 'soft-launched' the language reference and put it online on https://firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-rdbms/ and https://firebirdsql.org/en/reference-manuals/ Mark On 22-05-2021 19:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote: I have a 'feature-complete' Firebird 4.0 Language Reference ready to go live, but it

Re: [Firebird-docs] Review Firebird 4.0 Language Reference

2021-05-23 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 22-05-2021 19:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote: I have a 'feature-complete' Firebird 4.0 Language Reference ready to go live, but it would be helpful if others take a second look. Maybe sample a few sections, check for weird stuff in rendering, or simply take a look at the content. I'll publish

Re: [Firebird-docs] Review Firebird 4.0 Language Reference

2021-05-23 Thread Simonov Denis via Firebird-docs
Mark Rotteveel wrote Sat, 22 May 2021 20:24:25 +0300: I have a 'feature-complete' Firebird 4.0 Language Reference ready to go live, but it would be helpful if others take a second look. Maybe sample a few sections, check for weird stuff in rendering, or simply take a look at the

Re: [Firebird-docs] Review Firebird 4.0 Language Reference

2021-05-23 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 23-05-2021 10:53, Simonov Denis wrote: Mark Rotteveel wrote Sat, 22 May 2021 20:24:25 +0300: I'll publish the links on the site on Monday; maybe the current version, maybe after some further revision. I still have some TODOs in the source that I need to follow or just remove, but I think

[Firebird-docs] Review Firebird 4.0 Language Reference

2021-05-22 Thread Mark Rotteveel
I have a 'feature-complete' Firebird 4.0 Language Reference ready to go live, but it would be helpful if others take a second look. Maybe sample a few sections, check for weird stuff in rendering, or simply take a look at the content. I'll publish the links on the site on Monday; maybe the