Thank you all for your help and advice.
N
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Mark Rotteveel mark@... wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:00:38 +1300, Helen Borrie helebor@...
wrote:
At 07:56 AM 1/11/2011, you wrote:
On 31-10-2011 17:46, grip_2ls wrote:
Hi Mark
Thanks for the advise
the level 0 backup restores ok and gbak will then backup restore that,
could the corruption be somewhere that that doesn't matter?
how can I find and deal with it?
On 1 November 2011 09:47, Nick Upson nick.up...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry, didn't think to say, its version 2.1.4
On 31 October
Hello,
Unfortunately, I can't say more without thorough investigation.
It can be bug or corruption or misconfiguration.
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
the level 0 backup restores ok and gbak will then backup restore that,
could the corruption be somewhere that that doesn't matter?
how can I find
I have been looking into switching from gbak to nbackup. From what I have read
about nbackup I am left with some, possibly incorrect, impressions.
1) nbackup is a page level backup rather than a row-by-row backup like gbak.
2) nbackup does no integrity checking of the database as it is backed
Ann,
Thanks for the suggestion. If I can tie a deadlock to a process ID, that
will work out great. I was intimidated by the lock manager before but after
looking at its printout again, it doesn't seem that bad.
Thomas,
We do not have SysInternals ProcessExplorer on our server, but I see
Hello,
I have been looking into switching from gbak to nbackup. From what I
have read about nbackup I am left with some, possibly incorrect,
impressions.
1) nbackup is a page level backup rather than a row-by-row backup like
gbak.
2) nbackup does no integrity checking of the database as
On 26.10.2011 02:49, sir_wally_lewis wrote:
Thanks for the fixes to my C library Tomasz and for your help.
All my C Library is originally extracted from FreeUDFLibC and I added extra
functions.
There were errors in the C Code that I was unaware of.
Amazing that the same unaltered code
