Thomas,
I ran gstat and here is the result there is no USAGE% column:
Kind Regards,
Robert.
Database "op.fdb"
Database header page information:
Flags 0
Checksum 12345
Generation 28661
Page size 8192
ODS version 11.2
Oldest transaction 25549
Oldest active 28643
Hi,
this is an output from ibexpert, no usage% column here either:
Kind Regards,
Robert.
Database "OP.FDB"
Database header page information:
Flags 0
Checksum12345
Generation 28674
Page size
Hi,
Please have a look at SymmetricDS (http://www.symmetricds.org/). I have
been using it for the past 4 years with Firebird.
Thanks and regards.
Sudheer Palaparambil
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:05 PM, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support]
Hi Robert, you need to click on the second tab of the results - Tables.
The first tab - Text - does only show what you have here.
TableName SizeUsage%
CUSTOMER11,960,3200.295
PARAMFIL16,3840.000
POSTCODES3,903,012,86496.335
rgilland1...@gmail.com [firebird-support] schrieb am 27.11.2015 00:24:
> Hi,
>
>
> this is an output from ibexpert, no usage% column here either:
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
> Robert.
>
>
> Database "OP.FDB"
> Database header page information:
> Flags 0
>
Hi Slavek, there are a number of issues you need to resolve before
making a decision. If network performance is an issue then replication
is not the answer - unless you can send the changes back to head office
'out of hours'. This means the different databases will be out of sync
for some
> Hi Robert, you can do this easily with a tool such as IBExpert. Just run
> Services / Database Statistics and this is the result:
>
> TableName SizeUsage%
> CUSTOMER 11,960,320 0.295
> PARAMFIL 16,384 1 0.000
>
Hi,
Try IBReplicator.
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon
Hi all,
we are preparing new project with bidirectional replication.
Customer idea is to have master database in head quoter
and slave databases on production plant (to solve network performance
and availability issues).
Witch
hi,
modification datetime is not enaugh to replication. think about
1. transaction started and modify data2. synchronization started and fetch data
from last modifird datetime3. synchronization end4. transaction commit data
from point 1 and store datetime before synch started5.
I know,
what is better?
It is same in normal client server.
Two client start editing same record. Who will win?
In paranoia system, you will use dummy update before edit starts.
But in real, mainly web, system?
Slavek
Ing. Slavomir Skopalik
Executive Head
Elekt Labs s.r.o.
Collection and
Thank you, Szilveszter.
Mirco
11 matches
Mail list logo
