Hello.
FB 2.5.3 works (for me) on Win Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64 bits, and
others version of Win Server 2008 too.
Dell R620 32GB RAM Intel Xeon E-2609.
Hugo
On 02/01/2015 22:08, André Knappstein knappst...@beta-eigenheim.de
[firebird-support] wrote:
Fascinating...
I created a test table
Hi Andre,
- get some sleep
This is the key to find a solution, never optimize anything in a bad mood :)
WinSrv2008R2 is a perfect Windows Server, when properly configured.
Regards,
Alexey
Hey! Happy new year to all!
For me, it should have started with something great, new...
FINALLY! The migration from FB 1.5 to 2.5 (trust me, I had reasons not
to do it earlier). But now the old appications are all gone, and I can
migrate.
Seems there will be a delay. I migrated the
Thank you for the prompt answer, Sean.
But, no, I have read about this specific one.
And though I am sure I did not fully understand about it yet, since my
biggest database is only 1 GByte I *thought* this would not be a
problem for me.
Seems there will be a delay. I migrated the database from old hardware
running 1.5.4 to new hardware running 2.5.3. Backup/Restore is about 4
times faster. Wow!
But normal working is - at least - 50% slower sometimes worse.
[Old]
Server 2003 x86 no service packs
Xeon with 4 GB RAM
Thank you for the prompt answer, Sean.
But, no, I have read about this specific one.
And though I am sure I did not fully understand about it yet, since my
biggest database is only 1 GByte I *thought* this would not be a
problem for me.
Do you still have access to old
Fascinating...
I created a test table on both old and new server to play with updates
and inserts (~ 150.000 records)
Performance with 2.5.3 x64 on Win2008 is constantly
changing, but at best its some 8 seconds and worst even 2 minutes!
Performance with 1.5.4 x86 on Win2003 is always about
Yes, the old system is running.
It *is* the current production system of our company and it looks like
I'll be glad if it holds on a bit longer :-)
Don't know the Crystal Disk Mark.
Will check this out for sure!
Was trying to get some clue from Process Explorer (the former
SysInternals
On 3-1-2015 00:14, 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
[new]
Server 2008 R2 x64 SP1
Xeon with 8 GB RAM (I will shortly add +8) Classic 2.5.3 x64 Raid 0 on 3 *
600
GB SAS
Let me guess, you database is larger than 8GB (or 16GB in size)?
The problem is not
LSSBcfs Your problem is the infamous Windows 64bit File Cache causes excessive
Page File usage.
Btw, afaik, 2.5.3 should not have this problem with the Windows cache.
[]s
Carlos
Firebird Performance in Detail - http://videos.firebirddevelopersday.com
www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br
10 matches
Mail list logo
