I have an FB 2.1.5 Classic server running on a Windows 2003 server,
with a single hard drive for the operating system, and a 3 disk raid
5
array for the database. We have one database on this machine, which
is a dialect 1 database that was started on IB6.0 many years ago,
currently at 90GB.
-Original Message-
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Murdoch
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 10:27 AM
I have an FB 2.1.5 Classic server running on a Windows 2003 server,
with a single hard drive for the operating system,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Bob Murdoch mailgro...@murdochfl.comwrote:
That has been a problem for a very long time. Right now, a full
backup/restore cycle is taking more than 24 hours, and at best we only
have a 12 hour window at best on a Sunday. Hence the May 2009
creation date of
Hello Bob,
1): The most obvious thing according to the header page is a very
large
gap between the oldest active transaction and the next transaction.
This
means, you have a long-running/stuck transaction. If you are lucky,
you
can go into the MON$TRANSACTIONS table and check out if you
Hello Bob,
Is there any way to tell if the sweep was successful other than all of
the markers matching? Is there any way to tell why a sweep would have
failed?
No. You should manually check transactions' markers difference, or use
tool like FBDataGuard which can check it in desired time
Alexey
From: Alexey Kovyazin [mailto:a...@ib-aid.com]
Is there any way to tell if the sweep was successful other than
all of the markers
matching? Is there any way to tell why a sweep would have failed?
No. You should manually check transactions' markers difference, or
Hello Bob,
Is there any way to tell if the sweep was successful other than
all of the markers
matching? Is there any way to tell why a sweep would have failed?
No. You should manually check transactions' markers difference, or use
tool like FBDataGuard which can check it in desired
Here's a related question for you - as I looked at our script for
doing nightly backups, I see a note that says:
do not use garbage collection (gbak -g) since we run a manual sweep
every night
Do you know if that's true - we don't need to do garbage collection
via gbak if we are running gfix
Here's a related question for you - as I looked at our script for
doing nightly backups, I see a note that says:
do not use garbage collection (gbak -g) since we run a manual sweep
every night
Do you know if that's true - we don't need to do garbage collection
via gbak if we are running
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas
Steinmaurer
Here's a related question for you - as I looked at our script for
v doing nightly backups, I see a note that says:
do not use garbage collection (gbak -g) since we run a manual
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas
Steinmaurer
Here's a related question for you - as I looked at our script for
v doing nightly backups, I see a note that says:
do not use garbage collection (gbak -g) since we run a
I have an FB 2.1.5 Classic server running on a Windows 2003 server,
with a single hard drive for the operating system, and a 3 disk raid 5
array for the database. We have one database on this machine, which
is a dialect 1 database that was started on IB6.0 many years ago,
currently at 90GB. We
Hi Bob,
I have an FB 2.1.5 Classic server running on a Windows 2003 server,
with a single hard drive for the operating system, and a 3 disk raid 5
array for the database. We have one database on this machine, which
is a dialect 1 database that was started on IB6.0 many years ago,
currently
Hello Bob,
currently at 90GB. We have sweep disabled, and each night run gbak,
gfix --sweep, as well as reindex all tables via a script.
Seems like you do correct things, but do you check that sweep is really
successful?
Look at the transactions' markers log in IBTM (IBSurgeon Transaction
Alexey -
Alexey Kovyazin [mailto:a...@ib-aid.com]
Seems like you do correct things, but do you check that sweep is
really successful?
Look at the transactions' markers log in IBTM (IBSurgeon
Transaction Monitor), gathered from Profitmed
database (120Gb, 400 clients, 2mln transactions
Thomas -
-Original Message-
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas
Steinmaurer
1): The most obvious thing according to the header page is a very
large
gap between the oldest active transaction and the next transaction.
16 matches
Mail list logo
