Hello:
I can not start the service Firebird 2.5 on Centos 7. Please if someone
can tell me how.
thank you
--
Carlos Mazariegos
/Dirección de Desarrollo/
Universidad Mariano Gálvez
3a. Av. 9-00 Zona 2 · Int. Finca El Zapote
Tel: *24111800 Ext. 1166 y 1290* · Fax: *Ext. 1166*
Hello Mark.
I changed the firebird.conf by another one and restarted the server.
Now my string connection 192.168.0.158:C:\DIR1\BASEDIR\MYDATABASE.FDB is
working.
I compared both firebird.conf and found two differences:
1) In the line near
# Remove protection against opening databases on
Hello Mark.
I changed the firebird.conf by another one and restarted the server.
Now my string connection 192.168.0.158:C:\DIR1\BASEDIR\MYDATABASE.FDB is
working.
I compared both firebird.conf and found two differences:
1) In the line near
# Remove protection against opening databases on
Hi,
i have few questions releated to your problem
1. What is your sweep settings?
2. When you run backup and do you use gbak or nbackup?
3. what is your transactions settings? Do you use readonly readcommited or
prefered shapshot?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
>>Hey,
>>not sure how you can survive with superserver :)
>>I can't see that working with our kind of load (realtime-data-processing,
>>reports, mostly write IOPS)
>>It's a long time ago (Fb 1.5) since we used superserver but we didn't have
>>the best time with it back then.
I do not know what
Hello Olaf,
'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support] schrieb am 13.04.2016 14:38:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I've a problem with our database, firebird 3.0 RC2, some Clients (C++,
> Microsoft Access over Firebird ODBC). There are 7 open transactions. But
> in the monitoring Table, I
Hello,
I've a problem with our database, firebird 3.0 RC2, some Clients (C++,
Microsoft Access over Firebird ODBC). There are 7 open transactions. But
in the monitoring Table, I cannot see the one who is the oldest was shown.
Why?
INSERT INTO MON$TRANSACTIONS (MON$TRANSACTION_ID,
Patrick,
Definetely you need to compare real life loads.
--
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon среда, 13 апреля 2016г., 04:47 +03:00 от " thetr...@yahoo.com
[firebird-support]" < firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> :
>
>
>Hey Alexey,
>thanks you for our input. I think what you say is correct,
Hi,
You wrote:
>The thing is, sure this numbers look really low. But >the system never uses
>it. The monitoring of the >SAN show's that this load's are never used
You are confusing the reason and the result.
Monitoring shows low numbers because spinning drives cannot provide fast enough
random
