Re: [Fis] Revisiting the Fluctuon Model

2010-09-25 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
Dear Joe, Please let me start by repeating my idea that fluctuons are its, that is, energy in some form. If (mathematical) idealism is anti-realist, this is certainly not what I would consider Conrad's theory to be. Stan comes to the same conclusion, that fluctuons are its, but this suggests

Re: [Fis] Revisiting the Fluctuon Model

2010-09-25 Thread Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
Dear all, Regarding the very interesting discussion of it from bit and vice versa. Usually each level of information processing (semantic, algorithmic, implementational) presupposes some it in which bit is implemented. In computing, recursions must have a bottom. Could it be the case that on

Re: [Fis] Revisiting the Fluctuon Model

2010-09-25 Thread Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
Dear Rafael, Ø Otherwise bits turns into digital metaphysics Not necessarily if we take that dual nature seriously. They are both waves and particles. I have also written in that sense several times, among others in http://mdh.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:120541/FULLTEXT01 Dear Loet,

Re: [Fis] The Nature of Microphysical Information: Revisiting the Fluctuon Model

2010-09-25 Thread Kevin Clark
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://webmail.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20100925/7b25285d/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 2 Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:28:09 +0200 From: Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic gordana.dodig-crnko...@mdh.se Subject: Re: [Fis