Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Runway distance remainingsigns+placementscript done.

2004-09-09 Thread Gunnstein Lye
://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d -- best regards, Gunnstein

[Flightgear-devel] New type of ultralight aircraft

2004-09-06 Thread Gunnstein Lye
When will flightgear have a model of this?;-) http://www.yves-rossy.com/en/ (see the jet man link at the top right) -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bo105 + patch

2004-08-10 Thread Gunnstein Lye
On Monday 09 August 2004 17:12, Martin Spott wrote: Gunnstein Lye wrote: How? If pulling the collective up makes the heli go up, then I would expect the keyboard to behave in the same way: press up/pageup to go up. (If he meant mouse up, then I might agree) When you control the collective

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Newbee

2004-08-10 Thread Gunnstein Lye
recommend suse (my favourite), mandrake or fedora/redhat. AFAIK, they have the best hardware support and the easiest installation. (Debian is great for gurus, not so great for beginners.) -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo104 - patch

2004-08-10 Thread Gunnstein Lye
On Monday 09 August 2004 17:13, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Gunnstein Lye -- Monday 09 August 2004 16:35: Seriously though, it seems the problem here is that most, but not all, find it logical to map the up/down behaviour of a collective to the backward/forward motion of a joystick (or joystick

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bo105 + patch

2004-08-09 Thread Gunnstein Lye
of attack. I after updating from CVS I realized that the collective controls via the keyboard interface have changed and I must admit that I'm pretty much disappointed, Martin. -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: bo104 - patch

2004-08-09 Thread Gunnstein Lye
movement to the Z-axis. Solution: make the default whatever most people agree on, but make it easy to invert, as in X-Plane where you have an invert button next to each joystick axis. -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Anyone read polish?

2004-06-11 Thread Gunnstein Lye
of the medium and postage). I could sell flightgear CDs for $1.000.000 if I wanted to. Doubt I would sell much, though. =) -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear news letter

2004-05-04 Thread Gunnstein Lye
Air Time(s) Air Mail Ad NOTAM FlightMail -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenAL - http://www.openal.org

2004-04-23 Thread Gunnstein Lye
, of course, I assume you could survive an engine loss at one feet (foot?)) -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 0.9.4 - Aircraft Data - P51d

2004-04-02 Thread Gunnstein Lye
regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Trademark violations could be a problem

2004-03-26 Thread Gunnstein Lye
will qualify as fair use in _all_ civilized countries. I worry more about the US, [...] 3.. 2.. 1.. Flamewar!!! ;-) -- best regards, Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Paraglider model

2004-03-01 Thread Gunnstein Lye
On Saturday 28 February 2004 22:00, Gunnstein Lye wrote: On Saturday 28 February 2004 21:49, Gunnstein Lye wrote: On Saturday 28 February 2004 00:16, David Culp wrote: --aircraft=paraglider-jsbsim Just remember to change the paths of course. I have no experience in paragliders, so

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Paraglider model

2004-03-01 Thread Gunnstein Lye
me it's possible. Is this list the right forum for further discussion of the project, or should I go to the flightmodel or users list? best regards, -- Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Paraglider model

2004-03-01 Thread Gunnstein Lye
of the collapsed wing tips would be difficult, of course. best regards, -- Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Paraglider model

2004-02-28 Thread Gunnstein Lye
then how. best regards, -- Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

[Flightgear-devel] Paraglider model

2004-02-27 Thread Gunnstein Lye
FDM should I use? I'm thinking YASim but I'm not sure. Is the 3D-model mini-howto from 2002 still up to date? http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/fgfs-model-howto.html best regards, -- Gunnstein Lye Systems engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no