https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025711
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com ---
Tested on libreoffice-writer-4.4.3.2-4.fc22.x86_64
I see its working for valid input.
Whenever we enter some incorrect matras its not working.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135515
Marcus Moeller marcus.moel...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226831
Bug ID: 1226831
Summary: /etc/fonts/fonts.conf claims it references local.conf
but it does not
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: fontconfig
Assignee:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
You can pass those upstream, it does not necessarily use the same tools as
us. Fedora tests often catch things upstream is not aware of (mostly,
fontconfig coverage or you-only-need-two-more-glyphs to fulfill xx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226433
Marek Kašík mka...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226433
--- Comment #1 from Marek Kašík mka...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 1033398
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1033398action=edit
fontconfig patterns
This is probably not a bug. But I'm not sure so I'm reassigning this to
Le Lun 1 juin 2015 17:35, Alexander Ploumistos a écrit :
So that means two bug reports against repo-font-audit, one concerning
metadata files and the other one for ttfcoverage.
Sure, however I don't remember whom we stole ttfcoverage from :) Font
tooling was and still is a mess.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812207
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226522
Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
