RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-16 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 20:01, Victor Mote wrote: Peter S. Housel wrote: Looks like they want to donate it to Gnome, not Apache. AFAIR, the BSD license is pretty incompatible with the Apache license. One of the reasons that the xmlroff announcement doesn't change my commitment to FOP is

FOP and AreaTree serialization

2002-12-16 Thread Salonen, Aki
Hi! I've been using FOP for Inventory reporting in PDF format. It works great with documents less that 200 pages when we have enough memory in server. We need to produce reports with pages up to 1000 pages and within one pagesequence. I would like to serialize AreaTree to filesystem to prevent

Re: FOP and AreaTree serialization

2002-12-16 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 14:32, Salonen, Aki wrote: Hi! I've been using FOP for Inventory reporting in PDF format. It works great with documents less that 200 pages when we have enough memory in server. We need to produce reports with pages up to 1000 pages and within one pagesequence. I

RE: FOP and AreaTree serialization

2002-12-16 Thread Salonen, Aki
I am not using any forward references. I've debugged memory allocation and noticed that FOP allocates about 700Kb of memory for each page processed. This remains allocated to the end of pagesequence. If I've understood right, it's AreaTree that grows bigger and bigger. Is there any way or is

RE: FOP and AreaTree serialization

2002-12-16 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 15:52, Salonen, Aki wrote: I am not using any forward references. I've debugged memory allocation and noticed that FOP allocates about 700Kb of memory for each page processed. This remains allocated to the end of pagesequence. If I've understood right, it's

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

2002-12-16 Thread Tony Graham
Arved Sandstrom wrote at 14 Dec 2002 15:05:05 -0400: No bitterness at all, actually, Peter. It takes a bit of wind out of my sails, sure, since xmlroff is so similar to the project that Eric Bischoff and myself were working on. Tony has certainly been aware of that for quite a long time -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15409] New: - bitmap images appear with vertical displacement in PS renderer

2002-12-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15409. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Comment on Bug#15409 regarding 0.20.5 ship

2002-12-16 Thread Arnd Beißner
Hi folks, I just sent a bugreport including a fix for the PostScript renderer. The reason for commenting it here is that I think the fix should go into the 0.20.5 release (the fix is for 0.20.5RC download, not CVS). I was using the PDF renderer so far but am now using the PS renderer in

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/apps InputHandler.java

2002-12-16 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/16 14:01:43 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps InputHandler.java Log: Modified to use SAXParserFactory instead of loading class by name. Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +17 -26xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/apps/InputHandler.java Index:

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo FOTreeBuilder.java

2002-12-16 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/16 15:27:15 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo FOTreeBuilder.java Log: Removed unused imports, cleaned up style, logging and javadoc. Removed redundant unknown fo collection. Revision ChangesPath 1.41 +26 -39