keiron 2002/12/19 00:12:04
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo PropertyList.java
Log:
compare to correct string
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/PropertyList.java
Index: PropertyList.java
keiron 2002/12/19 00:13:18
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/image ImageFactory.java
Log:
add method to remove context
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +10 -1 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/image/ImageFactory.java
Index: ImageFactory.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ended up using a XSL parameter instead of baseDir. Can you tell me if
driver.render is thread safe. Can I have more than one conversion running at
the same time?
I think so (fop.0.20.5rc). I have it in a production web server and it works
well under resonably big
Hello there!
I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in
the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement.
It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course
it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15541.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15541.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
All cool, but how exactly is that better than having a PDF template that
is stitched behind or in front of the FOP result using iText or PJ?
Works well. Ok, PDF reading with our own library is a bonus as is better
XML output for debugging. But I don't see any immediate need for this at
the moment
:-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the
trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong
message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi support in action in
the trunk.
On 19.12.2002 18:11:02 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
I know, shame
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
:-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the
trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong
message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi support in action in
the trunk.
Jeremias,
I would encourage Oleg to bring this
