Re: FOP compliance in XML?

2003-01-14 Thread Benoit Maisonny
Thanks, Victor. I'll cross-check with what I have (Chuck Paussa's schema) and with my experience with FOP. Is there a keyword or something else we can use to query bugzilla about these limitations? Or maybe they are not all listed? Benoit Maisonny Victor Mote wrote: A couple of caveats: 1)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16017] - Jpeg's and the PDF Serializer

2003-01-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16017] - Jpeg's and the PDF Serializer

2003-01-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: bidi wiki

2003-01-14 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Victor Mote wrote: I just added a comment on your bidi wiki, in the Reordering the text section, regarding the line-by-line nature of reordering Middle-Eastern language text. This is something you no doubt already know, but was not clear to me until recently, and it may be helpful. Well done,

Re: FOP logo

2003-01-14 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Why don't we announce a competition. +1 +1 Set out some basic rules, provide somewhere to put the images and for others to make comments. The image could be any format but the final result should be SVG. There are some basic sizes, logo image, powered by size,

RE: FOP compliance in XML?

2003-01-14 Thread Victor Mote
Benoit Maisonny wrote: Is there a keyword or something else we can use to query bugzilla about these limitations? Or maybe they are not all listed? I've never made a comprehensive review of what is in Bugzilla. I don't know of any way to derive the list you seek. My goal has been to review the

RE: bidi wiki

2003-01-14 Thread Victor Mote
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: elaborate it further in implementation section. My problem is that I still doesn't have clear bidi implementation design in my mind, moreover the processing model as described in the spec sounds too quirky to me, all that fo-tree manipulation and directionality

Re: FOP logo

2003-01-14 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Hello! I have prepared free web poll at http://vote.sparklit.com/web_poll.spark/714566. I'm not sure about background...Comments? Anybody interested in admin rights - mail me. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel

RE: FOP logo

2003-01-14 Thread Victor Mote
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Why don't we announce a competition. +1 +1 +1 - what else? It might be good to have a time window for submissions a separate time window for voting. If everybody went out and voted today, we would have a lot of extra votes for the moose that might not be there after

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFRoot.java PDFOutline.java

2003-01-14 Thread keiron
keiron 2003/01/14 11:55:20 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/pdf PDFRoot.java PDFOutline.java Log: setting for page mode, fixed some errors Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +45 -9 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/pdf/PDFRoot.java Index: PDFRoot.java

Distributing jimi.jar

2003-01-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Did you know that the Cocoon guys have jimi.jar in their CVS? I wonder if that's correct and if yes, I think we should do it, too. Reading the licence I get the impression that redistribution of the jar is possible but not without restrictions. IANAL so who can we ask if distributing this jar is

Licensing confusion (was Re: Distributing jimi.jar)

2003-01-14 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
- forwarding to incubator and licensing lists - - note: licensing is not open to all - Jeremias Maerki wrote: Did you know that the Cocoon guys have jimi.jar in their CVS? I wonder if that's correct and if yes, I think we should do it, too. Reading the licence I get the impression

Re: Distributing jimi.jar

2003-01-14 Thread m . schaeffler
I think this is overdue! Most developer, like me, do not know a lot about the different Licences out in the wild. There must be a reliable Homepage were the Apache Project can build up on his own definition, about what is allowed and what is not. This should include of course information for the