duplicated sax classes

2003-01-19 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Hello! We've got SAX classes both in xml-apis.jar and batik.jar. I don't care about superfluous 10-20 Kb, but unfortunately it causes problems in some environments, for instance in eclipse. One fellow has developed FOP plugin for eclipse and he's got Duplicate class definition problem because

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16237] New: - superscripts and subscipts are placed too high / too low

2003-01-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16237. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16237] - superscripts and subscipts are placed too high / too low

2003-01-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16237. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: duplicated sax classes

2003-01-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I think we could just remove the SAX classes from batik.jar. batik.jar was compiled by us manually and Keiron (for trunk) and I (for branch) both haven't realized that the SAX classes slipped in, I guess. I'll check the way we generate that jar again tomorrow. It might simply be a matter of

Re: duplicated sax classes

2003-01-19 Thread Keiron Liddle
Current cvs batik has been fixed so that it uses the xml-apis.jar instead of having its own version. So if this is what is causing the problem you can make a build from current cvs. On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 06:41 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I think we could just remove the SAX classes