Re: [Fwd: xml.apache.org refactoring #1]

2003-01-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Christian Geisert wrote: From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to be a part of the XML PMC. From my experience, I think that it will be better to have 2 people rather than one in order to share workload, etc. So, they want 2

Re: Fop able to run without Batik?

2003-01-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Batik is only necessary to generate SVG output, right? Nope, you forgot about svg images. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Technologies, Israel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Named Destinations

2003-01-20 Thread Stefan . Wachter
Hi all. Reading the mailing list archives (developer and user) I found that the topic of named destinations was raised several times and it seems that many people would like / need this feature. Studiying the changes list I even found the entry # Linking to a specific page and a named

Re: duplicated sax classes

2003-01-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I think we could just remove the SAX classes from batik.jar. batik.jar was compiled by us manually and Keiron (for trunk) and I (for branch) both haven't realized that the SAX classes slipped in, I guess. I'll check the way we generate that jar again tomorrow. It might

Re: duplicated sax classes

2003-01-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Keiron Liddle wrote: Current cvs batik has been fixed so that it uses the xml-apis.jar instead of having its own version. So if this is what is causing the problem you can make a build from current cvs. Fine. I would be nice to have such batik.jar in 0.20.5 release. -- Oleg Tkachenko

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16257] New: - Problems with adding true type fonts to FOP

2003-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16257] - Problems with adding true type fonts to FOP

2003-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16257. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Fop able to run without Batik?

2003-01-20 Thread Keiron Liddle
Batik is only necessary to generate SVG output, right? I guess, a lot of people are using Fop to generate PDF only, but Fop needs batik.jar in any case because the driver initializes an SVG element mapping: org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings() :

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties PropertyConsts.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:42:40 Modified:src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties PropertyConsts.html Log: Trivial change Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +0 -0

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties AbstractPropertyValue.html PropertyValue.html PropertyValueList.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:45:18 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties AbstractPropertyValue.html PropertyValue.html PropertyValueList.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties FOAttributes.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:46:51 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties FOAttributes.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties PropertyConsts-class.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:51:12 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties PropertyConsts-class.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties introduction.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:52:06 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties introduction.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties classes-overview.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:52:44 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties classes-overview.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties enumerated-values.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:54:22 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties enumerated-values.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties getInitialValue.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:55:02 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties getInitialValue.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties propertyExpressions.html simple-properties.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:56:34 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design/properties propertyExpressions.html simple-properties.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/design/alt.design alt-design-frameset.html codeframe.html logo.html

2003-01-20 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2003/01/20 06:59:18 Added: src/documentation/content/design/alt.design alt-design-frameset.html codeframe.html logo.html Log: Code documentation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

Re: Named Destinations

2003-01-20 Thread Christian Geisert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. Reading the mailing list archives (developer and user) I found that the topic of named destinations was raised several times and it seems that many people would like / need this feature. Studiying the changes list I even found the entry # Linking to a specific

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16237] - superscripts and subscipts are placed too high / too low

2003-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16237. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Release

2003-01-20 Thread Christian Geisert
Ok, we should finally finish 0.20.5 Open issues: Remove xml-apis from Batik (Jeremias?) Joerg has mentioned bug #15936 as showstopper to me. (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15936) Should we try to fix this? If yes any volunteer? Anything else? Christian

cvs commit: xml-fop/lib batik.jar

2003-01-20 Thread jeremias
jeremias2003/01/20 08:11:13 Modified:lib Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain batik.jar Log: Removed the classes also found in xml-apis.jar to fix problems in Eclipse, for example. The batik.jar is still 1.5beta4. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

Re: Release

2003-01-20 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 20.01.2003 16:33:28 Christian Geisert wrote: Ok, we should finally finish 0.20.5 Open issues: Remove xml-apis from Batik (Jeremias?) done (in branch). Joerg has mentioned bug #15936 as showstopper to me. (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15936) Should we try to

Re: [Fwd: xml.apache.org refactoring #1]

2003-01-20 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'd volunteer if nobody else wants the job. On 20.01.2003 11:48:31 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Christian Geisert wrote: From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to be a part of the XML PMC. From my experience, I think that it

Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-20 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Can't we do it in a way that the history gets copied? That way, people downloading an old revision will have both src/org and src/java/org locally, so it uses a bit more storage capacity but still build. Is that doable? On 15.01.2003 19:41:51 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'll

Re: Release

2003-01-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Christian Geisert wrote: Joerg has mentioned bug #15936 as showstopper to me. (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15936) Actually, I can't reproduce it right now. I'll give it another try tomorrow. J.Pietschmann

Re: [Fwd: xml.apache.org refactoring #1]

2003-01-20 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'd volunteer if nobody else wants the job. On 20.01.2003 11:48:31 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Christian Geisert wrote: From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to be a part of the XML PMC. From my

Re: Ready for 0.20.5 from my side

2003-01-20 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Can't we do it in a way that the history gets copied? That way, people downloading an old revision will have both src/org and src/java/org locally, so it uses a bit more storage capacity but still build. Is that doable? On 15.01.2003 19:41:51 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: