DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Deperated volunteers? I can do without, I was just taking responsibility
because nobody wanted to take the first step. :-)
I really don't know. If you look here:http://xml.apache.org/management.html.
The PMC elects new members. So in theory all we can do is provide
candidates, but obviously not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias,
Without going back to the original posting, I suspect that the PMC does
not want to have to sort out candidates. It is our job to decide on two
nominations to the PMC, which the PMC intend, IIUC, to simply accept. I
haven't followed the discussion beyond that, and I nominated only
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Peter
On 22.01.2003 12:48:54 Peter B. West wrote:
Without going back to the original posting, I suspect that the PMC does
not want to have to sort out candidates. It is our job to decide on two
nominations to the PMC, which the PMC intend, IIUC, to simply accept. I
haven't followed
Hi all.
The external-destination attribute of the fo:basic-link-Element must be an
uri-specification. Uri specifications are defined in the spec as follows:
A sequence of characters that is url(, followed by optional white
space, followed by an optional single quote (') or double quote ()
Peter B. West wrote:
[..]
In any case, it's up to us to work out who we want our representatives
on the PMC to be, and forward one or two names. That's my take on the
matter.
That's how I understand it too.
And to simplify the nomination I'm stepping back.
+1 for Jeremias and Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Common guys! I'd like to have some participation on this matter from all
the committers since this an important thing.
Sorry. I guess it is not a big deal to me. I'm sure it is important, I just
don't understand what is required well enough to determine why A would be
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Common guys! I'd like to have some participation on this matter from all
the committers since this an important thing.
Sorry a bit sidetracked.
Personally I would like to see some sort of rotation (assuming that there will
always be 1 or 2). For example every 6 months.
Title: RE: Release
Hi,
Firstly apologies for the HTML attached to the end of this message, I think it's something to do with the mail server which I don't have access to. I have asked about it, but I'm going on holiday tomorrow, and haven't got a reply yet.
Some thoughts on the problems
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Personally I would like to see some sort of rotation (assuming that there will
always be 1 or 2). For example every 6 months.
Why? So the PMC becomes something that is better known and diverse than the
mystery that it currently seems to be.
Is it appropriate for PMC? If
Christian Geisert wrote:
+1 for Jeremias and Peter
me too +1
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello there,
after some research I found and fixed a bug in the PS renderer
that can be a real nuisance.
The problem is as follows: The ascii (and Unicode) minus
character is mapped to the hyphen character by the PDF
renderer. The PostScript renderer instead maps it tho the
minus character. This
14 matches
Mail list logo
