DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 17.02.2003 17:36:13 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Todos, as I see them:
- Remove all incompatible hyphenation files from CVS which are not clear
to be ok.
- Find Apache-compatible hyphenation files.
I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red Hat (the
jeremias2003/02/19 01:30:52
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs fonts.xml
Log:
Added note for applicability to PDF and PS renderers only.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +9 -0 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/fonts.xml
Index: fonts.xml
I've got positive responses from the XML PMC on Keiron's idea of a
rotating scheme for project representatives. There will be discussions
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the near future to adjust the XML charter
to today's requirements. What needs to be addressed is the oversight
factor: Too high a
FOP version 0.20.5rc2 contains the following hyphenation files:
- en_GB.xml: British English
- es.xml: Spanish
- fi.xml: Finnish
- hu.xml: Hungarian
- it.xml: Italian
- pl.xml: Polish
Christian, I'm most uneasy about hu.xml. It's the only one that IMO
doesn't have an explicit statement that the
Hello All,
I am very new to FOP and I am using FOP in my Project.
I want to create tables with border in my application, I am able to create
tables but without borders can any one suugest me a solution to get the
borders for table.
Thanks in Advance,
Venkata Suresh.
Use in the fo:table tag the following things:
border-left-color
border-left-style
border-left-width
border-top-color
border-top-style
border-top-width
border-right-color
border-right-style
border-right-width
border-bottom-color
border-bottom-style
border-bottom-width
greetings,
Jochen
Jochen
Venkata,
Just have an example as an extra:
fo:table border-top-style=solid border-top-width=1pt border-left-style
=solid border-left-width=1pt border-bottom-style=solid
border-bottom-width=1pt border-right-style=solid border-right-width=
1pt space-before.optimum=15pt padding=6pt
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've got positive responses from the XML PMC on Keiron's idea of a
rotating scheme for project representatives. There will be discussions
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the near future to adjust the XML charter
to today's requirements. What needs to be
On 18.02.2003 18:38:43 Victor Mote wrote:
OK, I am ready to jump in do some work. Sorry for being out of action for
so long.
Hey, no apology required.
The threads that I would like to complete, or at least resolve,
first, are:
1. Documentation. The main problem here is the web site
Thanks for the quick response. Can this information be added to the
release notes and/or readme?
I see that en_GB.xml exists but what's the story on what I would assume
would be called en_US.xml (US English hyphenation patterns file)? Does
it exist? Is it missing due to licensing issues?
J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for being unclear and short-spoken, I didn't meant to offend you.
Jeez, I was not. I think _I_ was not clear when posting the files.
However, did you really start with an empty file in an editor and typed
in all the pattern strings?
There are Original
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red Hat
(the relevant
files are installed into /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen). I /think/
these are standard generic TeX files, which would be subject
to Knuth's
license, which IMO is Apache-compatible. It
On 18.02.2003 22:07:13 J.Pietschmann wrote:
snip/
The LPPL'd hyphenation have to be checked thouroughly because
of LPPL 1. Condition 2 does not apply. Condition 7 is fulfilled
by keeping the file under LPPL. 3 is probably trivially ok as
mentioned above. 4, 5 and 6 can be easily checked and
On 19.02.2003 17:56:27 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red Hat
(the relevant
files are installed into /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen). I /think/
these are standard generic TeX files, which would be subject
to
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Currently, the project's a one-man show, so I think it doesn't qualify
as a candiate for an Apache (sub-)project. But who knows. That's why I
ask around first. Being a FOP committer I could also add it to FOP but I
think the project isn't exclusively useful in that
On 19.02.2003 16:47:30 Clay Leeds wrote:
Thanks for the quick response. Can this information be added to the
release notes and/or readme?
I'll put it on my todo list if nobody does it before I do.
I see that en_GB.xml exists but what's the story on what I would assume
would be called
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.02.2003 22:07:13 J.Pietschmann wrote:
snip/
The LPPL'd hyphenation have to be checked thouroughly because
of LPPL 1. Condition 2 does not apply. Condition 7 is fulfilled
by keeping the file under LPPL. 3 is probably trivially ok as
mentioned above. 4, 5 and
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
don't want another lengthy discussion started with my comments above. It
may even be best if you did it your way for now (we need to get the ball
rolling) and we adjusted the code to the Avalon environment as soon as I
have set it up. I'm still trying to get my mind
Hi there
Before I open a SourceForge project I wanted to ask if there might be
interest in a barcode library/framework here at Apache. I started to
develop the library two years ago and it has already seen real-life use
in two projects with my last employer. I'm in the process of doing a
major
keiron 2003/02/19 18:47:45
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/area AreaTree.java AreaTreeModel.java
PageViewport.java
src/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr PageLayoutManager.java
RetrieveMarkerLayoutManager.java
That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long
licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can
do it.
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
That's it. The board has finally spoken. We need to change to long
licences in our codebase. Anyone out there with free time? If not, I can
do it.
I can help you. Should we change both codebases?
--
Oleg Tkachenko
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
24 matches
Mail list logo
