DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18058] New: - Error fetching Image from URL

2003-03-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18058. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Embedding fonts!

2003-03-17 Thread Uwe Klosa
Hi, I'm using embedded fonts in fop. That is working fine. But if I want to edit the resulting pdf files with Acrobat, the font names aren't correct in the file. I'm getting 1Eec24TimesNewRoman or 2Ef1d7TimesNewRoman where it should be TimesNewRoman. Why creates fop theses font names? Has anyone

Re: logo contest

2003-03-17 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Peter B. West wrote: Let's do some elimination rounds. Everyone pick a small number of favourites, say 3. Eliminate anything that doesn't get 2 votes. Do the same, specifying 2 favourites. Eliminate. Then vote for 1 logo. Most votes wins. In the event of a tie, there's a run-off for the

Stylesheet Attribute Required.

2003-03-17 Thread Jochen . Maes
Hi all, I had to check this error out, and a while ago Oleg has helped me for trying to find it. But it didn't work back then... Now the error you get when using xalan transformer : stylesheet requires version, even when it set is solved very simple: just set

Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Before we start here's a little background on the hyphenation stuff: Our hyphenation file are XML files that are derived from TeX hyphenation Under what license where the original TeX files ? 2. If the former (of [1]) is true, we need a grant from the copyright holder of the original

Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Folks, See below the Latex License. http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.html It seems to me that clause '8.B makes this license more restrictive than the ASF license - and we thus should not allow code(fragements) which are under this license in downloads from ASF infrastructure. Or am

AW: Embedding fonts!

2003-03-17 Thread Müller, Markus
Hi, How did you create the font metrics files? Did you use the option -enc ansi ? Markus $ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- $ Von: Uwe Klosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Gesendet: Montag, 17. März 2003 11:33 $ An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ Betreff: Embedding fonts! $ $ $ Hi, $

Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks, Steven and Dirk for responding! On 17.03.2003 14:28:44 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: Before we start here's a little background on the hyphenation stuff: Our hyphenation file are XML files that are derived from TeX hyphenation Under what license where the original TeX files ?

SV: Embedding fonts!

2003-03-17 Thread Uwe Klosa
No, I didn't. Should I have done that? /Uwe -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Müller, Markus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 17 mars 2003 11:40 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: AW: Embedding fonts! Hi, How did you create the font metrics files? Did you use the option -enc ansi ?

Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
There's another IMO: Clause 7 expects a restriction that the ASL can't provide. On 17.03.2003 14:32:16 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: See below the Latex License. http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.html It seems to me that clause '8.B makes this license more restrictive than the ASF

Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I've just received that email. The original author is willing to fax in a grant. Question now: Where can I find the form? I've only found the one for committers. Thanks a lot! On 17.03.2003 15:23:55 Jeremias Maerki wrote: I've received an email a few minutes ago from a FOP contributor telling

RE: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: And then there's the files from the original TeX distribution by Donald Knuth which are assumed to be in the public domain but with certain restrictions (modified file shall not contain the same filename as the original). Problem there is that there is not really

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs resources.xml

2003-03-17 Thread vmote
vmote 2003/03/17 09:10:39 Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs resources.xml Log: Add reference to Mogwai project (Oki dot-matrix renderer), based on discussion today on the user mailing list. Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +5 -0

RE: Encryption

2003-03-17 Thread Victor Mote
Keiron Liddle wrote: Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a cron job every few hours? Currently it only updates the site here: http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to be down at the moment) From this site you can update the main site by entering the correct

Re: Encryption

2003-03-17 Thread Peter B. West
Victor, There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with a slightly elderly version (and I understand the current CVS is going to be a

Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files

2003-03-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks, Greg and Nicola, for your answers. I've already sent the form to the person I mentioned. Now that most of my questions have been resolved I'm off to distribute quite a bunch of these forms to all the various copyright holders. After it has been suggested that every single file submitted